2016 Postmortem

murielm99

(32,972 posts)

121. Oh, really?

Mon Apr 4, 2016, 04:20 PM

Apr 2016

I recall the brick post. I have seen Hillary called a whore, referred to as Shillary, called a liar. The posts were allowed to stand. No one pointed out anything.

There was no anti-semitism here. You are trying to start an argument where there is none, and you are being hypocritical in your comments.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

188 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We'll Never Know: 20 Legitimate Questions the American Media Refuses to Ask Bernie Sanders [View all] bravenak Apr 2016 OP

We'll never know what was in the transcripts... nt revbones Apr 2016 #1

Either that's a parody site, or it's performing research on people with Obsessive Fixation Disorder. TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #93

the hill camp is on a roll passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #186

His religion ? Smarmie Doofus Apr 2016 #2

Not one of the questions. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #7

You KNOW what my point is. Smarmie Doofus Apr 2016 #14

I don't KNOW what your point is ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #38

It would seem to be the only thing that matters to some people. Fozzledick Apr 2016 #39

Nonsense. murielm99 Apr 2016 #119

Funny, I wasn't addressing you, I don't even know who you are, Fozzledick Apr 2016 #124

That's funny. murielm99 Apr 2016 #164

Of course you're free to post meaningless non-sequitors. Fozzledick Apr 2016 #180

A whif of propaganda in the morning nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #3

It will be interesting when the primaries are over to see what questions are asked ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #4

I think they will tear him apart like a pack of rabid dogs bravenak Apr 2016 #6

There is already petitions and some real action to unseat him in the Senate ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #9

I think he needs to be primaried bravenak Apr 2016 #13

He should join the Democratic Socialist party ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #17

Hell yeah. If they will have him at this point bravenak Apr 2016 #22

LOL! TSIAS Apr 2016 #97

Petitions and serious attempts to unseat him. Or so they claim. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #126

Don't worry about that, he's going to be President soon Politicalboi Apr 2016 #102

So funny angrychair Apr 2016 #134

Wow I didn't know that. Can you point me to where I can find out more? cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #125

Bravenak, calm down. You are like leading the pack of rabid dogs. 7wo7rees Apr 2016 #156

When a person is on record as saying they hate Jews, it's hard to take their Marr Apr 2016 #5

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #10

Right? ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #15

I find antisemitism, and those who excuse it, a lot more disturbing than Marr Apr 2016 #18

Have a gif it's soothing ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #24

There is no mention of religion in the 20 questions in the article. R B Garr Apr 2016 #69

They don't care, they only wanted to derail the discussion. nt stevenleser Apr 2016 #187

Don't let them fool you Rob H. Apr 2016 #136

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #20

Yeah I get that ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #23

No lives. bravenak Apr 2016 #25

Speaking of 'feelings of grandeur'. Marr Apr 2016 #37

How disingenuous ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #40

Look, I realize you're some kind of fan of this person, but believe me-- Marr Apr 2016 #47

I'm so very glad you care enough to take the time to post a gif to tell me you don't care. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #49

"there is considerable more to "know" about Bravenek " jack_krass Apr 2016 #122

There is no mention of religion in this posted article. R B Garr Apr 2016 #81

Because bravenak has previously professed her hatred of Jews, and constantly posts Marr Apr 2016 #82

That's not how I've read bravenak's posts. So there must be another reason for attacking her R B Garr Apr 2016 #85

Her comments were unambiguously antisemitic. Marr Apr 2016 #94

Actually, this looks like an excuse to get posts hidden. This is just the latest angle. R B Garr Apr 2016 #104

"So there must be another reason for attacking her" Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #174

Haha, you really outed yourself with this one. I've already said what R B Garr Apr 2016 #175

"Previously" So you're dragging religion into a discussion that never mentioned religion before.... George II Apr 2016 #90

Not if they had previously professed hatred for women, no. Of course not. Marr Apr 2016 #100

Oh, really? murielm99 Apr 2016 #121

I got a hide for mentioning the brick post, murielm. sheshe2 Apr 2016 #155

Thank you, sheshe2. murielm99 Apr 2016 #165

But you can't substantiate your charge, clearly rendering it false. George II Apr 2016 #133

Here you go George riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #139

You're asking me to post bravenak's antisemitic comments? /nt Marr Apr 2016 #141

I know you won't be able to, so yes. George II Apr 2016 #142

Sorry, not taking your hide bait. Bravenak has acknowledged it herself, so I really Marr Apr 2016 #143

I must be on George's ignore list. Ah well everyone else can see it riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #145

This message was self-deleted by its author Marr Apr 2016 #146

Brick posts stand. sheshe2 Apr 2016 #166

So you want people to post the link to what she said Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #111

I believe that's considered contacting and attacking her family. Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #115

Crazy what it's come to Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #127

I've mentioned this for months, going back to last summer when the bogus charge.... George II Apr 2016 #132

It looks like what you've posted about Bravnek is mistaken uponit7771 Apr 2016 #153

Save your breath. Bravenak has admitted it herself. Marr Apr 2016 #157

On DU?! They weren't hidden?! You were already getting the side eye... this is bananas uponit7771 Apr 2016 #158

Go on making excuses for bigotry. Marr Apr 2016 #159

Asking a rational question isn't making excuses for anything, but not answering logical and uponit7771 Apr 2016 #160

Jury's in Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #71

Looks like someone is methodically alerting on every one of this posters posts in this thread...nt SidDithers Apr 2016 #74

Well. Looks like all the hides are pretty reasonable hides. Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #78

I've been beginning to wonder if 12 hides was the new de facto limit. Fozzledick Apr 2016 #109

Somebody has to hit 20. Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #112

Since she's a Hillary supporter Rob H. Apr 2016 #138

None of these hides are close. They're all 5-2 or 6-1 riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #79

Of course it's your well considered and honest opinion whatchamacallit Apr 2016 #89

. Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #113

Yup, that's what it looks like, exactly. Abuse of the system. R B Garr Apr 2016 #114

She's the victim here Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #117

Or when they post really horrible things. Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #130

So you can answer where religion is mentioned in the article she posted? nt R B Garr Apr 2016 #131

Yeap, and its pathetic uponit7771 Apr 2016 #154

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #80

Yes, but it's being promoted by *you*. Marr Apr 2016 #16

. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #19

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #21

So? /nt Marr Apr 2016 #26

Exactly. bravenak Apr 2016 #27

So? ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #28

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #31

I know that's right ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #36

You can't attack the message, so you atack the messenger lunamagica Apr 2016 #41

Will Pitt was hounded for years after his POSUC statement riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #48

This from so called "progressives". Shame on them lunamagica Apr 2016 #55

And that was an expression used for decades in media reportiong nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #56

No one has to forget and pretend her motives are not know as she continues with her bias motivated Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #50

What? Are you saying that she can't support Hillary anymore, and must not be critical of Sanders to lunamagica Apr 2016 #54

You know what really bothers me--to the point I actually do care? ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #60

Who are "her people"? Jew haters? Smarmie Doofus Apr 2016 #75

Are you sure she was talking about Jews? Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #98

I thought everyone loved Smurfs tkmorris Apr 2016 #105

Oh yes, poor bravenak-- VICTIM of antisemitism. Marr Apr 2016 #83

I think technically she'd be a victim of "anti-anti-semitism." Smarmie Doofus Apr 2016 #106

Calling someone out on racism is not racism. Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #84

I'm saying her continued smearing of a minority candidate after proclaiming hatered of that minority Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #144

Bigotry? Show me the bigotry in the OP? lunamagica Apr 2016 #147

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #171

Hey Aloha, girl~ Cha Apr 2016 #182

Cha! lunamagica Apr 2016 #185

Oh, please. Marr Apr 2016 #59

+10000 nt riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #65

She is not an anti-Semite. She started out as a Sander's supporter lunamagica Apr 2016 #66

Uh-huh. Marr Apr 2016 #68

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #137

To be fair, she posted an apology in GD:P, iirc Rob H. Apr 2016 #140

Thank you for the correction. Marr Apr 2016 #162

Funny thing is melman Apr 2016 #163

+1 treestar Apr 2016 #99

Come now. bvf Apr 2016 #151

i will SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #35

. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #12

No kidding. Months of attacking a minority candidate then admiting to bigotry against that minority. Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #43

Not only that, but she has admitted she doesn't even like Clinton. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2016 #123

Well she certainly spoke strongly against Hillary and Bill in 2014 Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #173

+1 Go Vols Apr 2016 #64

21. Will he remain a 'Democrat' after he loses the nomination? nt onehandle Apr 2016 #8

Answer: HELL NO bravenak Apr 2016 #11

Will you go back to being an open anti-semite after the election? HERVEPA Apr 2016 #44

Interesting transparency page you have there. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #46

Look real hard at any post of mine. You will not find anything the slightest bit racist or bigoted. HERVEPA Apr 2016 #52

Naw. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #63

Wonderful non-responsive answer HERVEPA Apr 2016 #73

#whichHillary... HumanityExperiment Apr 2016 #29

Have a gif it's soothing ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #30

hahaha rbrnmw Apr 2016 #33

Excellent article, Bravenak! lunamagica Apr 2016 #32

Hey!! bravenak Apr 2016 #34

I can't believe the hide lunamagica Apr 2016 #42

I can believe it ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #45

They are livid that she posted the artcle with 20 valid questions, which will become issues lunamagica Apr 2016 #51

The OP linked to the People's View, a blog by a troll banned from DU. No one will even read the Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #57

I'm sorry, but regardless of who wrote that, all those questions will come up if he he gets the lunamagica Apr 2016 #61

"No one will even read the wall of bullshit at the link." SMC22307 Apr 2016 #91

Who was the troll that was banned by DU? Unwanted Democrat Apr 2016 #108

Notice the very different use of words by those hidden and those not. Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #86

I believe posting jury scores constitutes posting her personal information Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #120

Is there any question there I need the answer to? immoderate Apr 2016 #53

I have one question for Clinton that they won't ask unapatriciated Apr 2016 #58

Stop with the deflection. Start your own thread if you want lunamagica Apr 2016 #67

My question is just as legitimate unapatriciated Apr 2016 #76

But you are deflecting from thr OP. Sorry you can't handle the 20 questions lunamagica Apr 2016 #92

Stop embarrassing yourself. Jester Messiah Apr 2016 #62

OP is Flagged For Review Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #70

She'll be back before tomorrow morning. Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #87

Maybe a new letter will come into play Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #95

I give it eight hours. He'll be harangued by a couple of protected groups... SMC22307 Apr 2016 #88

The rancor is totally understandable Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #96

Indeed it is. Wonder if the United States Postmaster General... SMC22307 Apr 2016 #101

It's coming from inside the house! Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #103

Sgt. Sacker to the rescue! (n/t) SMC22307 Apr 2016 #107

People's view...trash thread, lol. morningfog Apr 2016 #72

These questions are rather absurd. CRITICAL LITERACY PLEASE dr60omg Apr 2016 #77

I like question no 12 Gothmog Apr 2016 #110

Yes!! Actually, all these questions are just brilliant. The whole thing is done very well --- R B Garr Apr 2016 #118

There are good reasons why Sanders is not appealing to African American and other voters Gothmog Apr 2016 #176

Question azureblue Apr 2016 #116

Limbaugh would love this clown ... GeorgeGist Apr 2016 #128

Pathetic smear attempt. UNREC (NT) jack_krass Apr 2016 #129

20 Questions? You're joking right? The article had 147 question marks! cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #135

Lol, geez that article is dumb. Vattel Apr 2016 #183

They forgot "What was your involvement in whistler162 Apr 2016 #148

K&R sheshe2 Apr 2016 #149

Posts hidden by Jury: 12 SixString Apr 2016 #150

K&R Jamaal510 Apr 2016 #152

Thank you, bravenak! Excellent questions~ Cha Apr 2016 #161

Well, lucky for all of us that I'm one of those DUers who do listen to you, Bravenak... Violet_Crumble Apr 2016 #167

As always... it's good to see you, Violet! kdmorris Apr 2016 #168

It's good to see you too, kdmorris... Violet_Crumble Apr 2016 #169

Well, my twins got bigger and more mobile kdmorris Apr 2016 #172

DU Rec Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #170

The flag remains. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #177

It will be interesting to see for how long. Fozzledick Apr 2016 #179

Remember the Pledge Queen? SMC22307 Apr 2016 #181

I forgot about that one. m-lekktor Apr 2016 #184

Maybe Frontpage Mag Fozzledick Apr 2016 #178

Since you are too lazy to include a four paragraph excerpt, I am too lazy to click on your link. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #188