Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GreatGazoo

(4,619 posts)
56. It is as if they believe they can run anyone as long as they put enough money and media behind them
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 03:40 PM
Apr 2016

The oligarchs likely want a weak or weakened POTUS who will continue to need their money and media after the election. On that criteria she does well.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

With hundreds of millions in corp media propaganda, the establishment, and big money backers it Skwmom Apr 2016 #1
Well said madam! Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #43
^^^^^this^^^^^^ nt restorefreedom Apr 2016 #45
Kudos to you, Skwmom. You're exactly right. dchill Apr 2016 #52
Worst. Candidate. Ever. frylock Apr 2016 #54
It is as if they believe they can run anyone as long as they put enough money and media behind them GreatGazoo Apr 2016 #56
They want a woman so they can cry sexism anytime she is criticized for selling out the public. Skwmom Apr 2016 #57
where is the fourth? virtualobserver Apr 2016 #2
Thank you for catching my error. It was in Idaho. Edited. morningfog Apr 2016 #3
the last refuge for Hillary supporters holed up in Idaho virtualobserver Apr 2016 #6
Counties?.....might as well tally zip codes , they just as relevant Nt pkdu Apr 2016 #4
It is relevant to delegate allocation. morningfog Apr 2016 #5
Delegate count says otherwise. Feel the Math. Nt pkdu Apr 2016 #10
Ignore her recent pitiful performance. That's fine. morningfog Apr 2016 #11
She is getting battered against the rocks. nt artislife Apr 2016 #22
More states, more votes and more delegates. Firebrand Gary Apr 2016 #7
Look at the trend, though. I am not an idiot so I don't deny where we are morningfog Apr 2016 #9
It says that she is held to a different standard and always has been. Firebrand Gary Apr 2016 #12
No need for you to editorialize my thoughts. morningfog Apr 2016 #13
She won three states by over 60%: Arkansas, Kentucky, and West Virginia XemaSab Apr 2016 #15
What are you talking about? pdsimdars Apr 2016 #46
Imagine that. A candidate who has been groomed for 20+ years to be President.. frylock Apr 2016 #55
Someone said 2 counties will go for Bernie after clerical errors are corrected GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #8
. Buddyblazon Apr 2016 #16
Acres do not vote. People do. baldguy Apr 2016 #14
You guys have been using that number... Buddyblazon Apr 2016 #17
Because, like it or not, people keep voting for Clinton. baldguy Apr 2016 #20
Because they don't include caucuses where in many states popular vote is not recorded. DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #26
We don't nominate by popular vote either. morningfog Apr 2016 #18
Delegates are allocated by popular vote. More votes = more delegates. baldguy Apr 2016 #21
If she is our nominee in, you will find out how hard math really will be. artislife Apr 2016 #23
Delegate count per state is not based solely on population. And allocation is by state. morningfog Apr 2016 #24
And if you look at a real analysis of the votes. . that numbers is more of a propaganda than reality pdsimdars Apr 2016 #47
Huh. Orsino Apr 2016 #19
This is fascinating. Thanks. oldandhappy Apr 2016 #25
I guess we should install President McCain dsc Apr 2016 #27
And there goes the point right over your head! morningfog Apr 2016 #30
again Obama lost counties dsc Apr 2016 #41
You just helped make my point. Although he lost the states, he at least appeared viable. morningfog Apr 2016 #42
It's down to 3 according to NYTimes... DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #28
Hillary won just ONE county in Wisconsin. mhatrw Apr 2016 #29
Interesting, I will keep an eye on it. morningfog Apr 2016 #32
And yet, Hillary is far ahead. n/t Lil Missy Apr 2016 #31
No shit! As I said in the OP. She is less far ahead than she was though. Down from 335 to 215. morningfog Apr 2016 #33
She's not floundering, she's winning. n/t Lil Missy Apr 2016 #34
She is "leading" because of her padded delegate count from early on. morningfog Apr 2016 #35
She looks like a damaged candidate because she IS one. She will probably Still In Wisconsin Apr 2016 #36
How many counties does a candidate need to win to clinch the nomination? Freddie Stubbs Apr 2016 #37
Apparently reading comprehension is harder than MATH! morningfog Apr 2016 #38
And yet rock Apr 2016 #39
And now it's only 2... DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #40
Nothing to see here. Move along. The Midway Rebel Apr 2016 #44
As we say in the g.e., when the Repubs post those big mostly-red maps Tarc Apr 2016 #48
I would agree if that were the point. The point is not that she won few counties, she's won none morningfog Apr 2016 #49
I'll give you a baseball analogy Tarc Apr 2016 #50
A "few grand slams" would give you at least 12 runs, not 10. morningfog Apr 2016 #51
You have no chance Tarc Apr 2016 #58
Within in 10 points in NY and 6 in PA. Things are looking good. morningfog Apr 2016 #59
Things always look good when you cherry-pick the polls you like Tarc Apr 2016 #60
RCP has NY at 11 and PA at 17. Not cherries. And still good! morningfog Apr 2016 #61
You'll never hear that fact coming from any of the news stations. liberal_at_heart Apr 2016 #53
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»In Bernie's last 6 wins, ...»Reply #56