Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LonePirate

(14,367 posts)
2. Is it a trial by judge or jury?
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 03:46 PM
Apr 2016

A judge may make the case a difficult one to win; but all bets are off if a jury is involved and the case deals with an incident like Sandy Hook.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Its a case of chasing deep pockets and hoping emotional arguments Press Virginia Apr 2016 #1
Is it a trial by judge or jury? LonePirate Apr 2016 #2
Judge deciding (supposedly this month) if suit should continue.. jmg257 Apr 2016 #4
The guns were compliant with all existing laws madville Apr 2016 #7
Agreed. They are shooting for negligent entrustment, I THINK... jmg257 Apr 2016 #10
Then shouldn't the state of CT also be named, since they approved the sale? Press Virginia Apr 2016 #26
Yep - not very easy to sue legislators, I guess. nt jmg257 Apr 2016 #31
waste of taxpayer money lakeguy Apr 2016 #3
I'm assuming when they lose, they will be forced to pay court cost Travis_0004 Apr 2016 #55
Only if I can sue the knife Manufacturer Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #5
You should be able to scscholar Apr 2016 #38
No he shouldn't cannabis_flower Apr 2016 #103
So if someone hits me with a hammer - I should be able to sue Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #112
They have illegally big engines... scscholar Apr 2016 #113
Dude............ Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #115
You can. athena Apr 2016 #116
Bullshit. What an insane litigious nightmare you propose Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #117
You can't sue gun manufacturers. athena Apr 2016 #118
Wow did you miss the boat Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #123
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #128
Not trying to be contentious, so correct me if I'm wrong. Maedhros Apr 2016 #129
It's just that... CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #130
When people say "assault rifle" they mean "military rifle." Maedhros Apr 2016 #135
"I don't see a problem with... CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #138
I understand. Maedhros Apr 2016 #139
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #145
I'll watch for it. Thanks! Maedhros Apr 2016 #146
You' will doubtless remain confused regardless Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #131
Thank you... CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #132
That's not a well formed question jberryhill Apr 2016 #6
Well then, how about we sue you. For damages you are giving us. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2016 #9
You do realize you are speaking to a highly competent attorney who is a Bernie supporter? msanthrope Apr 2016 #12
It's a joke. Take a pill. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2016 #13
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #14
Go to YouTube and search for Jerky Boys punitive damages. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2016 #16
Jury results to go with all the legal talk. Autumn Apr 2016 #94
Aha!!! My good name is cleared!!!! Thank you jury! Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2016 #95
I understand there is a very good lawyer up thread, Autumn Apr 2016 #96
Who are you supposed to be again? I've never been a moderator. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2016 #18
"Dial it back" melman Apr 2016 #93
Duh, of course you need to have the relevant facts to know how the case should be resolved. Vattel Apr 2016 #25
That's not the point jberryhill Apr 2016 #44
I understand all of that. I wasn't talking about whether the motion to dismiss should be granted. Vattel Apr 2016 #84
Thank you! EffieBlack Apr 2016 #90
Exactly. kcr Apr 2016 #101
I don't support PLCAA. I think it is bad law and Bernie made a mistake in supporting it. Vattel Apr 2016 #121
But, as you seem to realize, that's different EffieBlack Apr 2016 #133
I have no idea dsc Apr 2016 #8
Yes. The AR-15 is a battlefield weapon, marketed to civilians. msanthrope Apr 2016 #11
There are no AR-15's on the battlefield. N/t actslikeacarrot Apr 2016 #17
They're everywhere!!! Behind trees, in dark alleys Press Virginia Apr 2016 #41
What about the state of CT which approved the sale of this "battlefield" weapon Press Virginia Apr 2016 #28
NO it is not the M-16 is a battlefield weapon that is fully automatic as are most battlefield guns azurnoir Apr 2016 #79
Incorrect HassleCat Apr 2016 #81
Numerous posters TeddyR Apr 2016 #111
It seems to me if you allow guns to be manufacturered then it's pushing it to say Nanjeanne Apr 2016 #15
Would you make the same argument for financial products? DanTex Apr 2016 #21
Exactly! Well stated. LAS14 Apr 2016 #27
The merits of their case will be heard in court. LAS14 Apr 2016 #29
What are the actual Merits? Remington made a gun and sold it to a dealer Press Virginia Apr 2016 #33
The part where they refuse to install biometric locks or other safety mechanisms. mythology Apr 2016 #34
Refused? Where are these locks and other safety mechanisms being used? Press Virginia Apr 2016 #36
I assume the court case would be... LAS14 Apr 2016 #35
what nuance. Remington didn't put the gun in Lanza's hand any more than the state of CT did Press Virginia Apr 2016 #39
Let the suit come to trial and find out the details then! nt LAS14 Apr 2016 #45
You mean let the parents parade their dead kids before a jury Press Virginia Apr 2016 #48
As I understand it, there was a concerted lawsuit blitz against gun manufacturers riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #51
That's incorrect. The reason the NRA wanted this law so badly is because there DanTex Apr 2016 #71
Are you a lawyer? nt riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #76
No, but I'm someone who knows about gun policy, and knew about this law DanTex Apr 2016 #83
Because nobody sues GM after getting hit by stolen Malibus Press Virginia Apr 2016 #92
are they selling guns to these criminals? Press Virginia Apr 2016 #30
Jack Daniels can be sued for that. They don't have the same legal immunity. DanTex Apr 2016 #50
Jack Daniels is liable for a kid stealing a bottle of Jack from their parents liquor Press Virginia Apr 2016 #52
They can be sued for that, because they don't have a special exemption. DanTex Apr 2016 #54
What about a kid murdering his mother and stealing her gun? Same thing? Press Virginia Apr 2016 #59
The gun industry should play by the same rules as everyone else, period. DanTex Apr 2016 #60
you mean we have to pretend any suit against the gun industry Press Virginia Apr 2016 #64
Of course not. Suits without merit get thrown out of courts all the time. DanTex Apr 2016 #66
They do. Press Virginia Apr 2016 #68
No they don't. PLCAA protects on the gun industry, nobody else. DanTex Apr 2016 #69
Protects them from what? Press Virginia Apr 2016 #70
From certain kinds of lawsuits that no other industry is immune from. DanTex Apr 2016 #75
You mean like liability in the criminal actions of murderer with a stolen gun? Press Virginia Apr 2016 #77
That's one example. Other industries don't have that protection. DanTex Apr 2016 #78
Because no one would try to sue GM after a car jacker ran them over in a 74 Camaro Press Virginia Apr 2016 #82
People file frivolous lawsuits all the time. The reason the NRA wanted this is for the DanTex Apr 2016 #85
They were succeeding in bankrupting an industry engaged in lawful commerce Press Virginia Apr 2016 #87
Well, no. Just holding them responsible for all the damage that they were inflicting. DanTex Apr 2016 #88
How were they inflicting anything through legal sales to their distributors? Press Virginia Apr 2016 #91
Your problem, is that its those pulling triggers inflicting the damage. N/T beevul Apr 2016 #141
^^^ this ^^^ eom Karma13612 Apr 2016 #24
are you a lawyer? nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #19
I am going to sue Gwhittey Apr 2016 #20
You might have a cause of action. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2016 #22
Wow, "old ass ugly chic", I bet you are a sexist jerk. But just basing that on your use of that term Logical Apr 2016 #23
Be sure to whine the next time you BernieBros get labled as sexist assholes. JTFrog Apr 2016 #57
Someone will show up with cute computer pictures and animation to show that there is no such thing. kcr Apr 2016 #102
There would probably be one very narrow way... CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #32
I think the parents should have their day... LAS14 Apr 2016 #37
If the parents were honest about liability, they'd sue the state and the dealer Press Virginia Apr 2016 #43
They can challenge the law, why not? Jefferson23 Apr 2016 #40
Remington sells to licensed dealers. The Bushmaster is not used in any Military in the world Press Virginia Apr 2016 #42
Negligence is not a factor in product liability suits jberryhill Apr 2016 #46
I should have said Negligent in their Entrustment Press Virginia Apr 2016 #49
Negligent entrustment is something else entirely jberryhill Apr 2016 #53
You read the complaint PDF; reads like that's their grounds and isa qualification made in the PLCAA. jmg257 Apr 2016 #62
But the person to whom it was supplied was murdered. Press Virginia Apr 2016 #80
Not specifically. The complaint is more concerned with showing the frequent misuse jmg257 Apr 2016 #86
Frequent misuse of the Bushmaster, right? Press Virginia Apr 2016 #89
The reasoning I stated for you is part of the argument being made within Jefferson23 Apr 2016 #47
Is it a military weapon or one that just looks like one. Press Virginia Apr 2016 #56
I guess that will be part of Remington's position in defense. n/t Jefferson23 Apr 2016 #58
The previous post is statement from the Plaintiff's attorney in their filing Press Virginia Apr 2016 #61
Not really, they are speaking to the rifles origins, don't you think? n/t Jefferson23 Apr 2016 #63
no. They claim Remington is liable for selling a military weapon to civilians Press Virginia Apr 2016 #65
No, I think you misunderstood. See post #67 Jefferson23 Apr 2016 #72
Summarized as "a civilian weapon designed for combat". That's their argument = jmg257 Apr 2016 #67
Civilian weapons aren't military weapons and military weapons aren't available to the general public Press Virginia Apr 2016 #73
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #97
I can guarantee there is no unit in the US Army or Marines Press Virginia Apr 2016 #98
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #99
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #100
Damn it - I want my Lend-lease M1 back. nt jmg257 Apr 2016 #104
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #105
H&R and SA still in the safe. Must of gone through jmg257 Apr 2016 #107
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #108
That's a very good reason. jmg257 Apr 2016 #109
Yep agreed - especially concerning ARs vs M16s. jmg257 Apr 2016 #106
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #110
Thank you very much, I appreciate it. Jefferson23 Apr 2016 #74
Wild guess. moondust Apr 2016 #114
I do not understand why the Brady Center is not footing the bill...they really jmg257 Apr 2016 #124
Thats the whole point. beevul Apr 2016 #142
Wow...interesting notion. jmg257 Apr 2016 #144
Couple thoughts TeddyR Apr 2016 #119
Are you a member of the NRA? athena Apr 2016 #120
So once again TeddyR Apr 2016 #136
Thats an opinion. beevul Apr 2016 #143
Hillary is not "exploiting" them anymore that Obama when he pleaded make gun control a issue in Jitter65 Apr 2016 #122
Smith and Wesson CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #125
If my kid was shot down like they were MFM008 Apr 2016 #126
Your lawyer CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #127
And you would end up paying the attorney's fees TeddyR Apr 2016 #137
it is like suing Ford for a drunk driver. the case would never stand up. if a serial killer used a Vote2016 Apr 2016 #134
So I was thinking.... WiffenPoof Apr 2016 #140
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Does anyone with any comp...»Reply #2