2016 Postmortem

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)

53. No. The thread is about HONESTY.

Fri Apr 8, 2016, 11:21 AM

Apr 2016

I have given you a fact based example with links to sources of Hillary LYING bold faced to the public about stuff that is easily proven to be lied. (Never got a subpoena/here's a copy.) She also lied about endangering National Security with her bad judgment - she says she didn't, but the Inspector General says she did. Now we will wait to find out if she is lying about having committed a crime or not, because the FBI is going to give us an answer on that soon.

If Hillary *didn't* commit a crime, Dems will be expected to drop it. (We all know the Republicans won't, but that is a different issue.) Bernie has nothing to do with this mess and neither do I. This is between Hillary and Obama - she was working for him when she made what she now admits were some "bad choices".

BUT the issue of Hillary's veracity is fair game, and that is what I gave you links about.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders uses padded data to back up his claim [View all] liberal N proud Apr 2016 OP

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #1

And if a Hillary supporter knows something about anything, it's lying. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #3

Yup, at this point anything for a Hillary supporter is false until proven true jfern Apr 2016 #4

For those just awakening from a 30 year nap, here's an update ... salinsky Apr 2016 #7

Obama hasn't had any trouble with them. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #10

There's no doubt about it ... salinsky Apr 2016 #19

An obstructionist congress is not a vast right wing conspiracy. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #21

Not a RW conspircacy pinebox Apr 2016 #43

I'm pretty sure the government of Saudi Arabia is in the fossil fuels industry AgerolanAmerican Apr 2016 #2

Dang it - those weren't supposed to be in the fossil fuel category - IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #6

Yes this smear must stick because I've said it enough times that it has to be true Dem2 Apr 2016 #28

How dare we think for ourselves? How dare we not be stupid? IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #33

Greenpeace screwed up Dem2 Apr 2016 #34

I don't believe you. I believe the very clear numbers from Greenpeace. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #38

Hey believe whatever you want Dem2 Apr 2016 #42

I admit my partisan bias on many issues, including Hillary being a bold faced liar. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #45

No offense, but Dem2 Apr 2016 #46

Short version: IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #47

So you're hoping to "disqualify" Hillary by hook or by crook Dem2 Apr 2016 #50

No. The thread is about HONESTY. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #53

OK Dem2 Apr 2016 #57

Yes it must be true because because because Dem2 Apr 2016 #27

Wow - now we have to educate Hillary supporters on common knowledge? IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #37

This is so arrogant and full of crap Dem2 Apr 2016 #40

Wikipedia = arrogant? And full of crap? IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #41

Enjoy the bubble Dem2 Apr 2016 #44

The "he's different" veil is falling off of Sanders fast, he's losing more than just this primary uponit7771 Apr 2016 #5

Yup ... salinsky Apr 2016 #8

Sanders is just another lying politician Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #9

Yes, turns out he's just like Hillary... Human101948 Apr 2016 #11

Who gives a shit? We knew about Hillary going into the primary. All this promise of revolution... Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #18

Only because people like you are obstructiionists... Human101948 Apr 2016 #30

If you want a revolution, you damned well find a leader. Sanders isn't it. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #31

You're probably right, but Hillary is just more of the same... Human101948 Apr 2016 #35

Three Pinocchios lying again? itsrobert Apr 2016 #12

This is data Greenpeace did a lot of research to obtain. pdsimdars Apr 2016 #13

WOW liberal N proud Apr 2016 #14

Some people still try to say Hillary is truthful after the last few decades. Motown_Johnny Apr 2016 #15

Absolutely. The desperation is growing as the claims are getting crazier. Sanders rhett o rick Apr 2016 #16

Sanders nailed it on breaking up the banks... liberal N proud Apr 2016 #20

Cherry picking. His comment was about a specific case that he wasn't familiar with. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #23

So, we're gonna disqualify Sanders because he did not know about a certain case? PatrickforO Apr 2016 #58

The main theme of his campaign is beaking up bank liberal N proud Apr 2016 #59

He does have a plan in spite of this particular effort to say he does not PatrickforO Apr 2016 #60

If I am going to be an expert on something, I had better know everything about it liberal N proud Apr 2016 #61

Yes. Because everyone knows what she was inferring... IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #22

That is BS liberal N proud Apr 2016 #25

You have your opinion, and the other 75% of the country has theirs. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #29

^^THIS^^ n/t Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #54

What? How can it be? "His Pureness" is being less than truthful? Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #17

Hillary has the highest negatives in history...and you just can't ignore that... Human101948 Apr 2016 #32

Thanks for finding this. LAS14 Apr 2016 #24

It sounds like those three pinocchios were well-earned Dem2 Apr 2016 #26

K&R mcar Apr 2016 #36

It's a big bus...there goes Factcheck! WhiteTara Apr 2016 #39

Are you still stuck on trying to justify Hillary's ties to the fossil fuel industry? Avalux Apr 2016 #48

The truth is that Bernie is a liar? liberal N proud Apr 2016 #49

LOLOL nice try. Hillary is the liar, projection isn't working. n/t Avalux Apr 2016 #51

Three Pinnochios. Not one , not two ..but THREE. Nt pkdu Apr 2016 #52

Three Pinnochios says otherwise here! liberal N proud Apr 2016 #56

But you know what? HassleCat Apr 2016 #55

Great post, liberal N proud! greatlaurel Apr 2016 #62

Sanders can be as disingenous in his attacks as any Republican CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #63

Thank you liberal N proud! DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #64