Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(141,926 posts)
16. See CoffeeCat's #5:
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 01:14 PM
Apr 2016

'You had to apply to be invited to this important event. Bernie obviously applied. Many important world leaders and scholars applied. Bernie was personally invited.'

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If this pans out to be the case, this is the second major lie from Sanders this week. Wow. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #1
Where is the lie? morningfog Apr 2016 #11
You just read it: the subject line. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #17
Please. Now go join your 300 friends on IGNORE. nt Land of Enchantment Apr 2016 #31
You have 300 people on Ignore? That's one way to filter out little truisms you hate to hear. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #35
"Truisms" Amaril Apr 2016 #42
Cling to that thought. Forever. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #43
Sounds like internal Vatican sniping to me. CanadaexPat Apr 2016 #2
It's reported all over the place as being valid. We'll know for sure as the date approaches/passes. RKP5637 Apr 2016 #3
I don't give a crap who invited him ........ I'm just glad he's going. polly7 Apr 2016 #4
Here is the press release from the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #5
can you make this a separate post. Csainvestor Apr 2016 #6
YES! (nt) CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #25
Sorry, Sanders WAS NOT invited...n/t asuhornets Apr 2016 #12
Yes, Bernie Sanders was invited--it's the only way to participate in this conference CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #19
no he was not.... asuhornets Apr 2016 #21
Still didnt read your own fucking link eh? bunnies Apr 2016 #22
So not the Pope then? Ergo #Bernieliedagain nt pkdu Apr 2016 #53
Bernie never said the invite was from the Pope. riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #59
Been traveling. I assume you've seen it by now. Nt pkdu Apr 2016 #72
The poster I was speaking to said ""he wasn't invited" bunnies Apr 2016 #71
Thanks, elleng Apr 2016 #13
Thanks. That adds some clarification. MineralMan Apr 2016 #20
You absolutely must make this a separate post. SheilaT Apr 2016 #24
Sanders isn't crashing any party here Tom Rinaldo Apr 2016 #7
He invited himself...no one extended an invitation to Sanders....n/t asuhornets Apr 2016 #9
YOu can't invite yourself, genius. YOu can request and invitation and if they want you, morningfog Apr 2016 #14
Sanders is being asuhornets Apr 2016 #28
Well that is a completely different point than the one you wisely abandoned. morningfog Apr 2016 #33
Too late for Hillary to think of it "first"? Contrary1 Apr 2016 #46
Genius? Is that contemporary slang for a complete fucking moron? TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #36
Yes. morningfog Apr 2016 #67
See CoffeeCat's #5: elleng Apr 2016 #16
Read your own goddamn link bunnies Apr 2016 #18
Read your own asuhornets Apr 2016 #23
Cant admit youre wrong eh? bunnies Apr 2016 #27
INDEED....n/t asuhornets Apr 2016 #29
Of course not ... TheFarS1de Apr 2016 #69
Sanders invited himself for political reason, classy guy... asuhornets Apr 2016 #8
Classy smear Tom Rinaldo Apr 2016 #26
Speaking of classy, how's that crow taste?: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #66
Sanders managed to get himself invited, which is fine, but apparently geek tragedy Apr 2016 #10
The Vatican has said no such thing. morningfog Apr 2016 #15
part of the problem is that the Vatican is not a singularity. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #47
Yup, not a singularity indeed Tom Rinaldo Apr 2016 #56
this seems a great way to spread his message and raise his national profile geek tragedy Apr 2016 #61
"managed to get himself invited" Amaril Apr 2016 #45
The Chancellor of the Academy, Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, extended the invitation Nanjeanne Apr 2016 #30
Yes, I saw that. Thanks. MineralMan Apr 2016 #32
Correct, the Pope's office made it very clear that he did not invite him. seaglass Apr 2016 #40
this may help Jack Bone Apr 2016 #34
Yes I'm sure you are ibegurpard Apr 2016 #37
So what if he applied to attend? They are important issues, and have been to him for decades. Lars39 Apr 2016 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj Apr 2016 #39
Shh. Sky Masterson Apr 2016 #41
I read his people reached out marlakay Apr 2016 #44
HERE is the invite--but not from the pope... riversedge Apr 2016 #48
and that aint all SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #49
A case of is and is not. madamesilverspurs Apr 2016 #50
I would rather know what we are doing to prevent the GOP from itself preventing millions Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #51
Here you go, including an explanation of why you are confused. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #52
You are so good at this passive aggressive stuff. Armstead Apr 2016 #54
No not really ibegurpard Apr 2016 #55
Come now, he's Just Asking Questions. QC Apr 2016 #57
+1 Punkingal Apr 2016 #58
No. He's not. SixString Apr 2016 #62
Not really, we've been wise to his act for years. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #68
By now I assume you've read all the posts with the correct information about how Vinca Apr 2016 #60
Maybe this will un-confuse you. aquamarina Apr 2016 #63
his confusion seems very "useful" TheSarcastinator Apr 2016 #64
All this hair-splitting aquamarina Apr 2016 #65
If you had waited till 840high Apr 2016 #70
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I'm more than a little co...»Reply #16