Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: A clueless Vatican chancellor didn't mean to step into US politics and [View all]Hoyt
(54,770 posts)22. Maybe they felt Sanders should show a little more respect for South Americans who
need investment and jobs provided by things like NAFTA, TPP, etc. Lots of folks here miss this aspect of trade agreements.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A clueless Vatican chancellor didn't mean to step into US politics and [View all]
pnwmom
Apr 2016
OP
He's going to the Vatican. Lots of people lied about this. They're not going to the Vatican.
DisgustipatedinCA
Apr 2016
#2
Where did anyone say he wasn't going to the Vatican? The dispute was in how the invitation
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#3
He will be going to the Vatican. Many people lied about him. They will not be going to the Vatican.
DisgustipatedinCA
Apr 2016
#9
Climate change and the sixth global mass-extinction event is happening now
SoLeftIAmRight
Apr 2016
#51
This chancellor said "it is a little impossible to understand." He is recognizing his cluelessness.
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#10
OMG. Let it go. Of course there's a political component to it. It's what politicians do!
reformist2
Apr 2016
#8
She didn't lobby for an invitation, as the President of the Academy says Bernie did. n/t
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#14
I believe her because that is much more in keeping with the Church's general policy NEVER
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#21
There is no reason to think they've made a special exception in this case -- especially in view
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#33
They might interfere behind the scenes but not publicly. Their public position is always neutral. n/
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#35
Archer and Sorondo's comments are the very definition of a private spat gone public nt
riderinthestorm
Apr 2016
#43
You might remember that a reporter questioned him about Trump -- he didn't insert himself into
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#63
He asked for an invitation, according to the President of the Academy, and so they sent one. n/t
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#77
He is not listed on the website as a speaker or a participant. In an odd wording,
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#17
He want's to give all Hillary supporters a respite from his socialist presences in the country for
Autumn
Apr 2016
#67
Another Sanders' Nationalist. America First and all that junk. I hope this conference
Hoyt
Apr 2016
#46
I'd suggest you look at out history in Latin America...and Bernies positions over the years
Armstead
Apr 2016
#53
NAFTA has helped. Most telling is Mexico begged to be part of TPP because they know it's the only
Hoyt
Apr 2016
#61
I mean officials elected by the people. Anyone who doesn't agree with you is a neo-liberal.
Hoyt
Apr 2016
#71
"Clueless Vatican chancellor": Three words seldom seen in proximity to one another
Fumesucker
Apr 2016
#31
Jews, Mormons and atheists/agnostics are the most knowledgeable groups in America about religion
Fumesucker
Apr 2016
#48
We aren't worried at all. We are wonks...and people are curious about the choice.
Lucinda
Apr 2016
#74