Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
7. It was Number One on the list given by someone claiming to have been paid to troll Sanders
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:11 AM
Apr 2016
1) Sexism. This was the biggest one we were supposed to push. We had to smear Bernie as misogynistic and out-of-touch with modern sensibilities. He was to be characterized as “an old white male relic...”. Anyone who tried to object to this characterization would be repeatedly slammed as sexist until they went away or people lost interest.

2) Racism. We were instructed to hammer home how Bernie supporters were all privileged white students that had no idea how the world worked. We had to tout Hillary’s great record with “the blacks” (yes, that’s the actual way it was phrased), and generally use racial identity politics to attack Sanders and bolster Hillary as the only unifying figure.

3) Electability. All of those posts about how Sanders can never win and Hillary is inevitable? Some of those were us, done deliberately in an attempt to demoralize Bernie supporters and convince them to stop campaigning for him. The problem is that this was an outright fabrication and not an accurate assessment of the current political situation. But the truth didn’t matter – we were trying to create a new truth, not to spread the existing truth.

4) Dirty tactics. This is where things got really bad. We were instructed to create narratives of Clinton supporters as being victimized by Sanders supporters, even if they were entirely fabricated. There were different instructions about how to do it, but something like this (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/10/31/1443064/-Dis-heartened-Hillary-Supporter) is a perfect example. These kind of posts are manufactured to divide and demoralize Sanders supporters, and are entirely artificial in nature.


http://socialnewsdaily.com/59087/reddit-user-claims-he-was-paid-to-troll-bernie-sanders-supporters/
Has #8 actually been done? Vinca Apr 2016 #1
Oh my... Yes. On twitter they ripped Jane apart for her looks. Let me go get you quotes.... peacebird Apr 2016 #3
Have our Hillary-supporting friends screamed "sexism?" Didn't think so. Vinca Apr 2016 #6
The Hillary campaign did this Trenzalore Apr 2016 #10
Yes. nc4bo Apr 2016 #5
I like the way Jane looks. She looks like an honest woman, happy in her own skin. peacebird Apr 2016 #2
Well done, Bob! beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #4
It was Number One on the list given by someone claiming to have been paid to troll Sanders GreatGazoo Apr 2016 #7
Striking how well it matches up to what I've been seeing on DU ... ebayfool Apr 2016 #21
So true. I've never seen anything like their sexism, they CharlotteVale Apr 2016 #8
That's about the size of it Bob. You could add, when Bill Clinton kicks black B Calm Apr 2016 #9
. mmonk Apr 2016 #11
Did the Clinton CAMPAIGN really do that to Jane Sanders??? Democrats Ascendant Apr 2016 #12
You know, I'd never believe I'd see any anti-semitic views on DU but they exist nc4bo Apr 2016 #13
I'm not really surprised by anything on DU anymore.... Democrats Ascendant Apr 2016 #14
It's the supporters as far as I know. nc4bo Apr 2016 #16
They've existed since its inception, it's just more obvious since their hatred of Bernie outs them. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #15
Not the campaign but her supporters were very vicious towards Jane's looks. jillan Apr 2016 #19
It is the same old same old Clinton fun and games dr60omg Apr 2016 #17
ugh, like the "not Black enough" shit they were pulling when it was race they were instrumentalizing MisterP Apr 2016 #18
BillyBob brought out the sexism card otw. K&R for Monday.nt nc4bo Apr 2016 #20
Hillary needs to apologize for this bit non-manufactured nastiness. nt nc4bo Apr 2016 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I finally understand the ...»Reply #7