Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

But the pope pics!! bettyellen Apr 2016 #1
Put a fork in The 'Not Hillary' Party. They're done. nt onehandle Apr 2016 #2
But but but ..... Emails!!! CAG Apr 2016 #3
There aren't enough polls to draw any conclusions GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #4
There's enough to make a chart! DCBob Apr 2016 #5
Okay and show me how many pollsters GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #8
Send your complaints to Huffington Post/Pollster. DCBob Apr 2016 #12
You drew the conclusions... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #17
No conclusions, just my informed opinion based on available data. DCBob Apr 2016 #22
some of which is over a year old azurnoir Apr 2016 #27
I filtered to just show polls from this year. DCBob Apr 2016 #31
you cut and pasted Huff Po's graph azurnoir Apr 2016 #75
Its called a "custom" graph. I suspect even you could do it. DCBob Apr 2016 #76
you're right I can indeed cut and paste from a publication azurnoir Apr 2016 #77
There is no cut and pasting involved. DCBob Apr 2016 #79
your graph is labeled was being HuffPo's as in published by HuffPo azurnoir Apr 2016 #80
It is "published" by HuffPost. They offer options to custom build graphs. DCBob Apr 2016 #81
Chuckle riversedge Apr 2016 #101
Ha ha. OilemFirchen Apr 2016 #74
Hillary is SURGING! workinclasszero Apr 2016 #6
Yes, one could look at that way. DCBob Apr 2016 #24
If flat lining is surging RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #53
"Flatlining" at 55% is not bad. DCBob Apr 2016 #87
Yeah well it's not surging. RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #89
Sanders donors... fun n serious Apr 2016 #90
Looking good! livetohike Apr 2016 #7
April has not been a great month for Bernie! n/t Lucinda Apr 2016 #9
Thats a shame.... workinclasszero Apr 2016 #30
Thank you, Daily News Bin interview. Bernie Sadners couldn't have done it without you! IamMab Apr 2016 #10
Apparently you didn't read about the fact that the interviewer was the one who was confused and JudyM Apr 2016 #13
Ok, sure, yeah, it's never Bernie Sadners' fault, ever, I know. nt IamMab Apr 2016 #14
Brilliant, substantive response. I'd normally say welcome to DU but ... no, not so much. JudyM Apr 2016 #18
Then how did you get in? nt IamMab Apr 2016 #19
Oh look, another clever remark. JudyM Apr 2016 #20
How would you know? nt IamMab Apr 2016 #21
Hehe.. DCBob Apr 2016 #23
I listened to the interview, after avyear of running on breaking up the banks Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #36
Face it--Bernie is not ready for prime time and he BLEW IT! riversedge Apr 2016 #104
DU rec...nt SidDithers Apr 2016 #11
Sanders will only get 40-43% of the vote here. hrmjustin Apr 2016 #15
Yeah, I am predicting 60-40. DCBob Apr 2016 #26
K & R most enthusiastically. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #16
that's based on 4 polls from different organizations. iow, meaningless noise magical thyme Apr 2016 #25
Its actually 7 polls. What if it was the other way around? DCBob Apr 2016 #29
the OP talks about Bernie dropping. From his peak in that chart there are 4 polls magical thyme Apr 2016 #35
This is the model HuffPost/Pollster has been using ever since the primary process began last year. DCBob Apr 2016 #37
yes there is. it's noise. there aren't enough pollsters doing repeat polls to tell a story magical thyme Apr 2016 #42
Its data. No poll is perfect. I look for recent trends. DCBob Apr 2016 #73
again, a few polls all from different pollsters do NOT show a trend magical thyme Apr 2016 #82
All aggregated pollsters graph data this way. DCBob Apr 2016 #85
Trending back to Spring 2015 is meaningless. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #32
I agree that polls from a year ago are meaningless magical thyme Apr 2016 #38
there are factors that favor Clinton, there are factors that favor Sanders magical thyme Apr 2016 #54
Just stand back when Bernie comes back from the conference wearing this bad boy! Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #28
LOL DCBob Apr 2016 #39
... magical thyme Apr 2016 #43
I can play with a customized graph too! karynnj Apr 2016 #33
Try again.. your graph didnt show. DCBob Apr 2016 #34
I opted to just put in a link karynnj Apr 2016 #44
Got it. But its better to post the graphic directly ... imo. DCBob Apr 2016 #46
This is Bernie's Waterloo, Stalingrad , Maginot Line, and Bar Lev Line built into one. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #45
Yes, I'm starting to see that. DCBob Apr 2016 #48
That's a lot of smoothing. Four of the last six polls have Sanders losing ground. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #41
Not true -- the last two are down from the two polls before that karynnj Apr 2016 #49
Graphing from Jan 2015 is absurd. DCBob Apr 2016 #47
We have been reminded, ad infinitum and ad nauseam, he's returning home. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #51
Fine plot from May 2015 -- when he did announce - by the way it only plots from March karynnj Apr 2016 #57
Plotting from then is still rediculous. DCBob Apr 2016 #58
NONE of the plots make sense karynnj Apr 2016 #67
Of course there is no statistical significance here. DCBob Apr 2016 #69
Sanders needs 60+ to get the needed delegates. Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #40
Yeah.. he needs a "yuuuuuge" win. DCBob Apr 2016 #50
Wins in all the rest of the primaries. Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #56
Which is impossible. DCBob Apr 2016 #59
Yes and the losses may be yuuugggeee! Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #62
YEAH! chillfactor Apr 2016 #52
You do know that they don't poll NY much RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #55
There will be more polls coming out soon if you dont trust these. DCBob Apr 2016 #60
If you say so. RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #64
I think what I posted is factual.. not my opinion. DCBob Apr 2016 #68
Bernie loved New York so much he moved to Vermont. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #72
That's a good question. DCBob Apr 2016 #78
Please enlighten me with your theory of his nefarious motive Armstead Apr 2016 #86
White flight perhaps? DCBob Apr 2016 #88
You just hit a new low....The only reason to leave the city are AA's? Armstead Apr 2016 #91
And so did millions and millions of others. RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #83
I was born in Manhattan (Mount Sinai Hospital) raised in Queens. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #93
And I was born and raised in Brooklyn. RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #94
Far Rockaway, Rego Park, and Forest Hills. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #95
Isn't Far Rockaway Nassau County? RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #96
Far Rockaway is in Queens, adjacent to Long Beach which is Nassau County. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #97
Good for you RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #98
My dad's luncheonette was in Redfern in the late 50s/early 60s DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #100
I think VT gave him a better chance to be a one-man-figure. Reather fits his MO IMHO riversedge Apr 2016 #105
Kick! Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #61
I don't know why realistically anyone would think that Sanders would win NY. Beacool Apr 2016 #63
They have become over confident with his string of wins in caucuses... DCBob Apr 2016 #70
Good news although I suspect it will closer than that SharonClark Apr 2016 #65
That New York Daily News article was disasterous for Sanders...I know many people who changed anotherproletariat Apr 2016 #66
Yeah, even though the Daily News is somewhat tabloidal it is read by millions.. DCBob Apr 2016 #71
It certainly was a hit piece. RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #84
Bernie blew it--he was not ready for vetting--which showed his #FAIL in the interview riversedge Apr 2016 #102
Great! You should be very happy then. Marr Apr 2016 #92
K&R mcar Apr 2016 #99
REC. and Thank you. riversedge Apr 2016 #103
Kick! Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #106
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Latest Huffpost/Pollster ...»Reply #104