2016 Postmortem

Joob

(1,065 posts)

61. I don't know who's behind that, but are we seriously still calling it a clerical error?it's Sabotage

Reply to Chezboo (Original post)

Wed Apr 13, 2016, 03:24 AM

Apr 2016

Should be investigated. Regardless of who you support. Then again, this is the Democratic party.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

212 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

UPDATE: ***URGENT Action Required*** NEW YORK voters [View all] Chezboo Apr 2016 OP

So the BS cheerleaders are stating early with their excuses why BS doesn't do well in NY? n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #1

You know that is a seriously fucked attitude, right? dchill Apr 2016 #2

NY SANDERS VOTERS: IGNORE THE EFFORT TO DERAIL THIS THREAD AND... Peace Patriot Apr 2016 #40

Thank you! Chezboo Apr 2016 #49

From now on cannabis_flower Apr 2016 #77

Great idea! I would add that you state that only PHONE VERIFIED changes can be made. flor-de-jasmim Apr 2016 #102

+1000000!!!! KPN Apr 2016 #162

+1000 senz Apr 2016 #166

Why am I not surprised... Chezboo Apr 2016 #4

I think voter affiillation being changed w/o someone's knowledge is serious SFnomad Apr 2016 #5

And how does it hurt to check your registration? Your comment seems to say people shouldn't check pdsimdars Apr 2016 #107

Where did I say it hurts to check your registration? Oh that's right ... I didn't SFnomad Apr 2016 #113

I dunno. Your post and the ones upthread seem kind of silly. KPN Apr 2016 #164

The OP makes some bold claims with nothing to back it up SFnomad Apr 2016 #168

Sigh! KPN Apr 2016 #175

I know, it's exasperating when someone asks for proof and you don't have any. n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #177

No you just said it was a stupid idea and wasn't happening, wasn't true. . . . pdsimdars Apr 2016 #204

Tell me leftynyc Apr 2016 #73

Perhaps cannabis_flower Apr 2016 #79

The OP isn't saying people are changing their registrations... brooklynite Apr 2016 #92

This line... cannabis_flower Apr 2016 #93

New York requires any party affiliation has to take place about 6 months prior to a primary. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #193

What's your point? cannabis_flower Apr 2016 #210

There is no documented evidence of the voters having their political affiliation changed yet LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #211

Remember Bernie's voter data was hacked first. pdsimdars Apr 2016 #106

Where did I dissuade? leftynyc Apr 2016 #111

But the polls ARE turning. . . oops! pdsimdars Apr 2016 #205

Go ahead an post any leftynyc Apr 2016 #209

The switching of votes have happened for years now on vote machines. Now they just hack bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #129

The link in the OP doesn't say anything at all about Bernie supporters. The OP altered Tanuki Apr 2016 #134

That's a good point. So why don't you all send this out to Hillary supporters too? KPN Apr 2016 #165

NGP VAN database software senz Apr 2016 #170

Voter suppression is a serious issue regardless of party ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2016 #35

Maybe you should read my Post #5, the one right above yours n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #36

What exactly are you "smelling" to know? highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #62

I'm smelling BS right now ... really not much different than the OP n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #63

I think you must be smelling the fumes of your own fervor, based on the clear shenanigans highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #65

What needs to be said over and over. . . .how can it hurt to check? pdsimdars Apr 2016 #108

Oh, it wouldn't only hurt one side. Only ones I've seen reported so far are from Bernie supporters. highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #182

And that's why they were protesting so much .. . pdsimdars Apr 2016 #200

David Brock scratch and sniff crothch stickers? Who knows what someone "smells" and why, Dragonfli Apr 2016 #71

So even if it's true you don't give a shit as long as Hillary wins? B Calm Apr 2016 #128

Bzzzzt .... no, but thanks for playing, we have wonderful parting gifts for you n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #152

On ignore you go. Bye. nt ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2016 #151

You could have done that without dramatically notifying me about ... SFnomad Apr 2016 #153

This is what enthusiasm and dedication look like. Sorry you don't understand that. Avalux Apr 2016 #155

Bernie said he can win without New York Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #159

No, they are just punching back before hand. KPN Apr 2016 #161

Why wouldn't Hill fans want New Yorkers to check their registrations? senz Apr 2016 #163

Wher did I say that? Why do so many BS fans ask questions of things never stated? n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #171

LOL Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #3

You know ... NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #8

You don't like it? Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #12

It's not a matter ... NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #20

I think it's hilarious. Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #22

Well, then I'll anxiously await ... NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #24

No in fact I didn't even read the OP. Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #28

Holy Shit! sheshe2 Apr 2016 #33

Probably not my finest hour LOL Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #39

Well thank you for that. nt sheshe2 Apr 2016 #207

I wonder why people assume it was Hillary who would change them IF they were changed? pdsimdars Apr 2016 #109

Somehow I don't think you will await with anxiousness. bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #131

What justification would you use to alert on that? revbones Apr 2016 #32

Well, there would be the TOS ... NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #44

Seriously, what part of the ToS do you think you could justify an alert on that with? revbones Apr 2016 #48

Of course Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #126

So you're agreeing with me or the one threatening to alert on people that can't back up their claim? revbones Apr 2016 #130

Neither Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #133

So you say it's sad but then agree with neither position. Weird. revbones Apr 2016 #136

Especially the ones that come blazing into the forum using right wing attacks against Democrats. JTFrog Apr 2016 #140

Amen, sister. Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #144

I've been hanging out here since practically day one Desert805 Apr 2016 #156

This is true. Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #172

Oh, go ahead. bvf Apr 2016 #38

"This site could sink a lot lower." NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #66

So take my advice and alert. bvf Apr 2016 #81

Yeah, I agree Desert805 Apr 2016 #157

flagged for review due to alert stalking and Bernie friendly jurors rbrnmw Apr 2016 #195

A pure canard. And yeah... bvf Apr 2016 #197

Remember the voter database breach brouhaha? mariawr Apr 2016 #101

"Hillary ate my registration." LuvLoogie Apr 2016 #6

Not necessarily but they could have a list of Bernie supporters. pdsimdars Apr 2016 #110

No one changed shiiit fun n serious Apr 2016 #7

You don't know what you're talking about. People on this forum have had it happen to them. nt Chezboo Apr 2016 #30

I didn't realize there was enough tin foil in this world for all these hats. RandySF Apr 2016 #9

I wish I'd invested in Reynolds Wrap ... NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #11

I don't even know what to say about the OP obamanut2012 Apr 2016 #76

Ohh I knoow...who ever heard of "voter suppression?" senz Apr 2016 #173

Cut off for declaring party affiliation was October sheshe2 Apr 2016 #10

Rules are for other people. RandySF Apr 2016 #13

I guess. sheshe2 Apr 2016 #16

That's not quite true SFnomad Apr 2016 #14

Party affiliation was my point. sheshe2 Apr 2016 #43

You stated "declaring" party affiliation in the earlier post. If you meant what you are saying now SFnomad Apr 2016 #46

Lol! sheshe2 Apr 2016 #52

Yep. Don't you find bvf Apr 2016 #53

It wasn't disinformation .. I believe the person was just unclear about what they meant SFnomad Apr 2016 #55

Clearly, it was meant to mislead. bvf Apr 2016 #56

No, it wasn't ... but you go right ahead and put another layer on that tin foil hat of yours ... SFnomad Apr 2016 #60

Oh, it's pretty clear what you think. And I've read it all. bvf Apr 2016 #64

Could that person not edit the post? hellofromreddit Apr 2016 #100

Blaming the victim? CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #15

You are on a roll here. sheshe2 Apr 2016 #27

The OP altered and misrepresented the information at the Facebook site. Check the link Tanuki Apr 2016 #138

They were done before the cutoff and some people are noticing now Chezboo Apr 2016 #19

New voters are not subject to the "October rule" as a poster below assumed, so if they registered D Dragonfli Apr 2016 #29

I was hoping you would see this. Chezboo Apr 2016 #42

This post was not about switching TO Democratic From independent Dragonfli Apr 2016 #21

50%? REALLY? NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #17

Really? You're going to trivialize potential election fraud? revbones Apr 2016 #34

I fail to see how Nance is trivializing anything. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #57

Like WMD, no facts just Speculation and that worked out just fine. bahrbearian Apr 2016 #121

Spot on. N/t nolawarlock Apr 2016 #180

Someone says there's a problem revbones Apr 2016 #127

has that really been shown? nolawarlock Apr 2016 #181

Yes. revbones Apr 2016 #183

Ok so the next question is ... nolawarlock Apr 2016 #186

Look. If you choose to not believe it, that's on you. revbones Apr 2016 #187

I prefer knowledge to belief nolawarlock Apr 2016 #188

Fine. Disbelieve if you want. revbones Apr 2016 #191

I'm no great fan of her either. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #192

Because, being Conservative Democrats (an oxymoron in my opinion) they miss the good old days Dragonfli Apr 2016 #69

How did you come up with that number? Renew Deal Apr 2016 #96

Did you mean to reply to me? I didn't mention numbers. nt revbones Apr 2016 #124

Do you believe the number in the OP is accurate? Renew Deal Apr 2016 #125

As a programmer, I can quickly change millions of records with a single query. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #189

How would someone with access to registration information know who is voting for Sanders? anotherproletariat Apr 2016 #18

It may not just be Sanders voters. Chezboo Apr 2016 #25

Data Gate. The unprotected server at the DNC bahrbearian Apr 2016 #137

. RandySF Apr 2016 #23

Lol. oasis Apr 2016 #75

Singing and humming to the tune of the carburyme Apr 2016 #179

Already the excuses begin. nt TMontoya Apr 2016 #26

Recommend also posting this in the NY and Bernie Sanders forums Lodestar Apr 2016 #31

It looks like Arizona was a trial run a victim of this hapening to a staffer of one of the officials Dragonfli Apr 2016 #51

"An initial survey in New York ... NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #37

Yikes! sheshe2 Apr 2016 #50

I notice they can't answer your valid points ... nolawarlock Apr 2016 #59

There is nothing to back this up-- it's nonsense... TreasonousBastard Apr 2016 #103

K&R 1,000x!!! THIS IS VERY URGENT! Peace Patriot Apr 2016 #41

Should be a call out to ALL NY voters planning to vote in either Repub or Dem primary. pat_k Apr 2016 #45

They issue voter registration cards to new voters with affiliation marked , but if the computer Dragonfli Apr 2016 #58

Thanks for the info. And... pat_k Apr 2016 #67

It's more than online registration, that is a red herring, it is about the database itself, Dragonfli Apr 2016 #70

When I used the term online I meant the lookup. pat_k Apr 2016 #82

Sorry I misunderstood you, everthingyou just posted is really good and helpful thinking and all Dragonfli Apr 2016 #88

K & R AzDar Apr 2016 #47

K&R nenagh Apr 2016 #54

I don't know who's behind that, but are we seriously still calling it a clerical error?it's Sabotage Joob Apr 2016 #61

I see you've now posted ... NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #68

Less election fraud enthusiasts cheering on such illegality, and less disruption there, yes /nt Dragonfli Apr 2016 #74

*Ahem* bvf Apr 2016 #86

LOL leftynyc Apr 2016 #72

This obamanut2012 Apr 2016 #78

Sorry, you fail the Arizona election integrity test! Peace Patriot Apr 2016 #80

More excuses leftynyc Apr 2016 #83

Kindly explain how the culprits knew which voters backed Bernie. oasis Apr 2016 #85

They can't. It's just paranoia. Pure silliness. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #94

No wonder Thom Hartmann is able to sell so much gold. oasis Apr 2016 #150

Greatly appreciate what is being done here even though... NCTraveler Apr 2016 #84

How would they know from the registration who the person supports? Starry Messenger Apr 2016 #87

Good question pdsimdars Apr 2016 #105

No, Bernie stole Clinton's Iowa data. Starry Messenger Apr 2016 #145

I clicked on the Facebook page, and it does not say what you claim. I put the changes in bold. Tanuki Apr 2016 #89

And there you have it ... deception and lies. Proof! NurseJackie Apr 2016 #95

Deception on the part of the OP, it seems. MineralMan Apr 2016 #115

The changes introduced by the OP are appropriate, given the fact Trajan Apr 2016 #139

This is not the Bernie Group. If it were I wouldn't be posting in this thread, as I was Tanuki Apr 2016 #141

This is GDP, not the Bernie Group. tammywammy Apr 2016 #149

Preemptive excuses. I'm sure that survey was really scientific. nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #90

Tell us: how did the County BOEs KNOW that you all were Sanders supporters? brooklynite Apr 2016 #91

How was there no election fraud in NY until Bernie showed up? Renew Deal Apr 2016 #97

Why are you only concerned with Bernie voters being disenfranchised? Renew Deal Apr 2016 #98

How did they come up with the 50% number and do they know the % of all other voters switched? Renew Deal Apr 2016 #99

Is that the only way Hillary can win, by dirty tricks? Let's see if it's true, but is sounds like pdsimdars Apr 2016 #104

What in the world does this OP have to do with Hillary Clinton? obamanut2012 Apr 2016 #147

You should go read the original FB post and not the edited OP tammywammy Apr 2016 #154

Oh dear Lord. A 50% switch targeted at 1 candidate! Horse. Shit. Godhumor Apr 2016 #112

I checked. Why did you change the wording of the original MineralMan Apr 2016 #114

Jury results Gothmog Apr 2016 #116

Why was this post alerted? NWCorona Apr 2016 #117

On the Bernie subreddit they are saying this is uncomfirmed and not real. JTFrog Apr 2016 #119

Editing original content and posting it without MineralMan Apr 2016 #123

Because if the word gets out it is a threat to them Dragonfli Apr 2016 #135

Dumbest alert ever. You can only win by voter suppression. You're losing, deal with it. Zira Apr 2016 #208

I guess it's fun to brag about his support with independents, until a closed primary... IamMab Apr 2016 #118

Interesting to see Hillary's supporters cheering what amounts to voter suppression azurnoir Apr 2016 #132

It's not voters suppression for a party to make its own rules. IamMab Apr 2016 #196

as I said OR limiting voter participation-parse it any way you wish but that is what it amounts to I azurnoir Apr 2016 #198

Parties are not governed by the Constitution. IamMab Apr 2016 #199

so wanting broader voter participation is overriding freedom of association? azurnoir Apr 2016 #201

You're the one squealing for access you don't deserve. IamMab Apr 2016 #202

Ha ha Freddie Stubbs Apr 2016 #120

How many times can the boy cry wolf here? Tarc Apr 2016 #122

Seems exaggerated to me Dem2 Apr 2016 #142

Reads like a hyperbolic email screed for donations. randome Apr 2016 #143

Tired of this B.S. HughLefty1 Apr 2016 #146

Let me guess... malokvale77 Apr 2016 #148

^^^ This ^^^ senz Apr 2016 #169

Oh, but how could they possibly know... malokvale77 Apr 2016 #174

I so appreciate your making the connection. senz Apr 2016 #176

Its....Magic! workinclasszero Apr 2016 #184

Everyone who believes in fair and honerst elections KPN Apr 2016 #158

SPREAD THIS INFORMATION VIA FB AND TWITTER. senz Apr 2016 #160

Mine was OK, last time I checked, but thanks! Babel_17 Apr 2016 #167

Voters were indeed disfranchised in Arizona azmom Apr 2016 #178

The Secretary of State testified it happened to one of her staffers. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #190

Bet 90% of them really didn't make the deadline. nt Jitter65 Apr 2016 #185

How many people were included in this initial survey? 2? 400? 1500? LonePirate Apr 2016 #194

K&R again! Super Important! Peace Patriot Apr 2016 #203

The most likely cause of voter affiliation switching is... Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #206

I'm not normally a paranoid person, kiva Apr 2016 #212