Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nope! Bohemianwriter Apr 2016 #1
Bernie thinks you're being inappropriate and there's no place for your comments in his campaign Renew Deal Apr 2016 #6
Oh, that will scare us. 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #12
Interesting glimpse into your mindset anigbrowl Apr 2016 #90
you should start with Hillary if you like to analyze 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #113
+1. Simple truth. Sanders can't associate with this stuff. Hortensis Apr 2016 #38
Well he does have a problem with women... scscholar Apr 2016 #76
Only in your head does he have a problem with women... Bohemianwriter Apr 2016 #106
You might want to look up the TM99 Apr 2016 #107
I do, it's too loaded. I prefer "shill." morningfog Apr 2016 #2
No more accurate than whore however. Hortensis Apr 2016 #42
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #3
Bernie disagrees with your apologia for sexist language Renew Deal Apr 2016 #10
And Hillary thinks all of her supporters are someone to use 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #20
Gender has everything to do with that Renew Deal Apr 2016 #24
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #33
I've heard men called corporate whore or attention whore lots of times TheFarseer Apr 2016 #83
No one used it on a woman Politicalboi Apr 2016 #89
No one used it..... so you're not alone. LOL, okay then. bettyellen Apr 2016 #94
Yes I continue to defend 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #4
Not at all. It is a perfectly fitting pejorative description of political scumbags. nt Bonobo Apr 2016 #5
Get your popcorn ready, part of DU denies it happened & another part justifies the use of the word. FSogol Apr 2016 #7
Really? That's a popcorn situation for you? 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #11
Of course it is Renew Deal Apr 2016 #17
Lol. Did they say he was wrong or that they simply won't follow in lockstep? 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #36
So he's right? Renew Deal Apr 2016 #40
No, they just don't follow in lockstep. 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #45
You can't have it both ways Renew Deal Apr 2016 #48
by you? who gives a shit what you think? 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #53
That should be Bernie's slogan Renew Deal Apr 2016 #54
lol. your desperation is showing 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #66
They can't seem to grasp that. Marr Apr 2016 #97
No we are denouncing your edict of perfection. TM99 Apr 2016 #109
I prefer 'Political Barfly' PeoViejo Apr 2016 #8
No. I'll pass. nt Autumn Apr 2016 #9
k&r bigtree Apr 2016 #13
I would...he's not the boss of me. Nt jmg257 Apr 2016 #14
Unlike Hillary supporters, I don't blindly and unquestioningly agree with whatever my candidate says hobbit709 Apr 2016 #16
Don't you think it's time to admit you're wrong Renew Deal Apr 2016 #21
I see nothing wrong with calling corporate Dems persons of easily negotiable virtue. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #25
Such a Rebel! Such a Revolutionary! LuvLoogie Apr 2016 #26
"Don't follow leaders. Watch the parking meters" hobbit709 Apr 2016 #39
Not bloody likely. Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #18
Good OP, I think we're learning a lot about his supporters from the responses. Thanks! George II Apr 2016 #19
Bill doubles down on superpredator concept noiretextatique Apr 2016 #22
My response is that I had better not see a single use of "media whore," "corporate ScreamingMeemie Apr 2016 #23
Bernie is a classy guy. I think she is a Corporate Whore IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #27
Bernie says there is no place in our politics for comments like yours Renew Deal Apr 2016 #35
Good for Bernie ibegurpard Apr 2016 #65
It seems you expect other posters Puglover Apr 2016 #88
Not for Hillary supporters. They reset their moral compasses every day, to match their candidate's Marr Apr 2016 #98
Why do you care? Suddenly his opinion matters to you? IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #112
No. If the shoe fits.... alarimer Apr 2016 #28
Word politics, again hereforthevoting Apr 2016 #29
Jury duty brought me here. Is there room for CP time? Hiraeth Apr 2016 #30
No. RiverLover Apr 2016 #31
as usual, bernie takes the high road restorefreedom Apr 2016 #32
Good for Bernie. Shame for those continuing to defend this. CrowCityDem Apr 2016 #34
Fascist thought police out in full force messiah Apr 2016 #37
Would you say that it's "political correctness run amok?" Renew Deal Apr 2016 #47
Yes, they will...nt SidDithers Apr 2016 #41
Yes; surely everybody understands that Sanders' supporters may disagree with him on specific matters Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #43
Good question mcar Apr 2016 #44
IN a political campaign I disavow it. But in normal conversation, in general terms.... Armstead Apr 2016 #46
There is no need to defend it. It's an accurate statement of our Democracy. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #49
Additionally, WTF another surrogate said only" hard workers" support BS Iliyah Apr 2016 #50
"...hard-working Americans, white Americans" frylock Apr 2016 #73
I would not choose the word myself randr Apr 2016 #51
Corporate "stooges" Renew Deal Apr 2016 #55
I don't have a problem with the term; I think it was inappropriate to use it in this setting. cyberswede Apr 2016 #52
I've decided to just let it go. Will you let it go? CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #56
Nope. The shoe fits. pinebox Apr 2016 #57
Yes I disavow the use of the word "whore" Triana Apr 2016 #58
Thank you, Senator Sanders Tarc Apr 2016 #59
Who originated the phrase? MadCrow Apr 2016 #60
Bernie does not control me nor do I control him ibegurpard Apr 2016 #61
I do not. I agree with Dr. Song that corporate whores are a huge problem. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2016 #62
Absolutely not. If the shoe fits... Broward Apr 2016 #63
They don't care. Only some of us are not allowed to disagree with him, you see. Starry Messenger Apr 2016 #64
P. J. O'Rourke wrote a book about the subject. PADemD Apr 2016 #67
I do not. At all. We, as Democrats, have been calling out corporate whores for decades Joe the Revelator Apr 2016 #68
Disavow? Not really, but it did give an opportunity for righteous indignation... lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #69
In practice, though not in principle. Orsino Apr 2016 #70
I think the problem with using one_voice Apr 2016 #71
Nnnnnnnnnnnnope! I understand context. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #72
No, I don't. I didn't when Randy Rhodes got in trouble for saying it. I don't now. phleshdef Apr 2016 #74
doubling-down seems to be a common trait among some here DrDan Apr 2016 #75
.................................................................................................... bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #77
No Kalidurga Apr 2016 #78
I dont AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #79
Nope. revbones Apr 2016 #80
NO islandmkl Apr 2016 #81
What word should we use instead ? What other word would you agree to... so the phrase is berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #82
Thank you for this thread. It reaffirms what we already knew about Sanders's supporters. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #84
I don't have to disavow it My Good Babushka Apr 2016 #85
Gladly. Ready to move on, now. snot Apr 2016 #86
No, nothing wrong was said Politicalboi Apr 2016 #87
Yes. Sometimes the truth is uncomfortable. eom guillaumeb Apr 2016 #91
No, I do not. Marr Apr 2016 #92
Bernie is simply choosing not to take up this fight. It costs him nothing to jonno99 Apr 2016 #93
Evidently not redstatebluegirl Apr 2016 #95
I found the use of the term to be apt. Even though it was not directed at Clinton it sure fits her. CBGLuthier Apr 2016 #96
No leftinportland Apr 2016 #99
No. Hell Hath No Fury Apr 2016 #100
Not the metaphorical meaning, though. longship Apr 2016 #101
It was fine to apologize since the Clinton campaign jumps on stuff like this... polichick Apr 2016 #102
I think I will stick with corporate democrat or Beowulf Apr 2016 #103
Nope. Would Corporate Princess be more acceptable? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #104
no. elana i am Apr 2016 #105
Corporate Whore 9/28/2003 Kittycat Apr 2016 #108
No, "You lay with dogs..." bahrbearian Apr 2016 #110
No. You must have loved "media horse online". ieoeja Apr 2016 #111
Absolutely! loyalsister Apr 2016 #114
Perhaps in "political discourse," whatever that is, Blue_In_AK Apr 2016 #115
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie disavows the "...»Reply #26