Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Paul Song was not even referring to Hillary Clinton when he called out "corporate whores." [View all]TM99
(8,352 posts)80. Then you don't belong here.
Corporate whores, media whores, and attention whores in reference to men and women, Democrats and Republicans have been made on these boards for over a decade.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Paul Song was not even referring to Hillary Clinton when he called out "corporate whores." [View all]
mhatrw
Apr 2016
OP
No, he wouldn't, but thanks for sharing from your very cloudy crystal ball and talking points.
merrily
Apr 2016
#9
This healthcare discussion needs to be over, we must have single payer and now.
Jackie Wilson Said
Apr 2016
#27
there is no equivalency . . . these exaggerated and twisted memes are coming from ONE SIDE ONLY
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#47
And gave him a rousing cheer. Intentional or not, his fans loved it. Sad that.
George II
Apr 2016
#7
They cheered, too--the full quote, where he named her twice, talked about PRESIDENTS
MADem
Apr 2016
#51
LOL. Replace "Secretary Clinton" with "Senator Warren", and nobody would think Song was
mhatrw
Apr 2016
#58
DUH. "Senator Warren" isn't RUNNING for anything. Good grief--you can't even read for context?
MADem
Apr 2016
#62
You need to start a thread about Marco Rubio if you want to talk about him--this comment is
MADem
Apr 2016
#68
Women are being called whore from 12 on, for the rest of their lives. Every woman that heard it,
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#10
Every woman heard a woman called a whore. You can change it up however you want.
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#14
The only reason Clinton supporters arrive at this conclusion is because the shoe fits so snugly.
mhatrw
Apr 2016
#21
No--there is no reason to believe he meant anything other than the Secretary of State when he made
MADem
Apr 2016
#56
No we didn't, stop speaking for us. Jesus that's the LAST thing we need, we'll be laughingstocks.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#23
Yes, it is very, very ugly to whore out your position of power to corporate interests.
mhatrw
Apr 2016
#60
You know what I "agree" with? That anyone who doesn't see this for the disgusting slur it is
MADem
Apr 2016
#61
The only reason Clinton supporters arrive at this conclusion is because the shoe fits so snugly.
mhatrw
Apr 2016
#20
LOL. Had he been talking about Elizabeth Warren before he said "corporate whores", not a
mhatrw
Apr 2016
#31
By all means, continue to defend Son'gs misogyny, long after Sanders himself apologized for it
Tarc
Apr 2016
#33
Really? So you think it is apt to describe Hillary Clinton as a corporate whore?
mhatrw
Apr 2016
#38
Exactly - why do the hillbots assume that he was referring to Hillary?
hopeforchange2008
Apr 2016
#43
35 years ago, students at my college were calling other students who dressed up or brought signs
mhatrw
Apr 2016
#57
Hillary and her supporters are not bothered or inconvenienced by facts or truth.
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#46
Yes, he said the word is bad. I can see that. Some people don't like to call assholes assholes.
mhatrw
Apr 2016
#67
Just about everyone's more conservative down here, churches, blacks, whites, fireants, coyotes. nt
nc4bo
Apr 2016
#71
He literally mentioned her twice in the two sentences prior to his use of the word "whore."
ContinentalOp
Apr 2016
#75