Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary - Marriage Between a Man & Woman is a Bedrock Principle.. I see your true colors shining [View all]Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)69. Hillary + Principles = Oxymoron
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
276 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary - Marriage Between a Man & Woman is a Bedrock Principle.. I see your true colors shining [View all]
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
OP
All politicians including Bernie took this position at one time or another, or at least all
Jackie Wilson Said
Apr 2016
#1
Thanks.. for your consideration.. bit of an exaggeration.. but that's par for the course in camp
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#6
yep...and achieved his desired effect…fvcking with Democrats at DemocraticUnderground
blm
Apr 2016
#197
here.. you tell me the difference between the two.. 1 is a Progressive 1 is a neocon
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#9
No he didn't, please stop repeating that talking point - it's a lie, he never opposed ssm.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#16
He never opposed it, you've tried to claim this repeatedly but always fail.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#146
Your repeating it over and over again isn't going to make it any less of a fabrication.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#151
LOL - it has been shown many times. But you are too stubborn to accept your hero
dbackjon
Apr 2016
#157
If by many times you mean never I agree. And lay off the strawmen, they're flammable.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#160
You might want to look into Bernie's history a little more before you double down on that... lol
revbones
Apr 2016
#45
Except he never said lgbt people shouldn't be allowed to marry, not once.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#154
He posts about that essay constantly, his obsession with it is disturbing.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#25
When your candidate is a political weathervane and her record is not Progressive than you
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#28
and there you go again, trying psych..poor BMUS, trying so hard to make relevant conversation.
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#73
I'm quite fine since I'm not the one who keeps obsessing about rape fantasies and orgasms in GDP.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#75
Yes, we are well aware of your disturbing focus. And calling me sweetie is extremly creepy.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#78
Please don't use sexist terms of endearment to address me, it's creepy.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#83
It gender neutral. Oh you've never done the same? Oh sure you have. Was that creepy too?
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#87
I feel like I need a shower after reading your posts about rape and orgasms.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#94
So I'm disturbed, creepy, obsessed, disgusting, and now dirty..any more insults you care to hurl? nt
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#96
I never called you those things, why do you keep obsessing about this?
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#99
I described your behaviour, nice try. And it does speak for itself. Just ew.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#106
Except you're the one using sexist terms of endearment to dismiss my opinions. Okay, I forgive you.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#112
Sweetie is gender neutral...apparently clarifying for the 5th time may finally sink in
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#114
I don't care if you forgive me or not...the term is not sexist, as you keep asserting.
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#118
I've heard the same thing from men for years, you're still forgiven.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#121
and I've used it toward both genders...so your limited view of the world just got expanded
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#123
I've been dismissed by sexist women before as well, you're still forgiven.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#126
forgive all you want.....this is no better than being pissy at me because I used the word sweetie
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#133
Now I'm "pissy" for calling out a sexist term? What's next, calling me bitchy and hysterical?
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#136
That's what the guys always say too, it's okay, you're all forgiven.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#142
Who said that? Sounds like something a person who would call a woman 'sweetie' would say.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#158
So no one said that? Good! I was going to lecture that person on the use of demeaning sexist terms.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#171
Yikes that obsession of yours is worse than I thought, you don't even understand it was about gender
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#240
Feel better, really. I wish you the best. And when a woman says stop it means stop.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#247
Calm down, it's really not that big of a deal...you should really not use that tactic
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#255
What's that? I can't hear you - my hormonz is all out of whack since you called me sweetie!
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#257
Lol.you tried that tactic on me before. So what word did you try to use that auto corrected to yik?
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#259
Derp! Auto correct shortens subject lines that exceed 100 characters, keep up. What's a 'you phone'?
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#268
Yep, what kind of person who is shocked by misogyny spells misogynistic? Oh noes I'm fainting again!
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#271
I think I would like to disengage from this conversation with you... it's creeping me out a bit...
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#37
You keep obsessing about something he quoted about orgasms from a medical journal.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#44
BLANCHE FETCH MAH SMELLING SALTS, I DO BELIEVE I'M GETTING THE VAPOURS!
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#248
Please yell louder, you must think it makes you more relevant. But will no longer distract me.
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#251
I'M TOTES SERIOSE, I READ IT AGAIN AND PEARLS ARE BEING CLUTCHED AS I TYPE!
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#253
I'M SERIOUS!! YOU CONVINCED ME, POSTING THAT LINK FOR THE GAZILLIONTH TIME WORKED!
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#261
Typo nazi types "yik" and can't admit a mistake...cover up fail. But here is a link to the essay
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#267
STAHP!! Every time you post that I faint! And think of the kittens!
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#276
I'm sure the was a level of metaphors about it.. Have you read it..link supplied
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#243
They also think that women who fantasize about rape actually want to be raped.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#245
It was an essay about gender stereotypes and shocker: women do fantasize about it.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#17
I don't know of a woman that fantasizes about being gang raped simultaneously by 3 men
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#22
I must have missed the part about being "gang" raped, and tell me more about women's fantasies
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#23
of course you missed it, or you have reinterpreted what it means to be raped by 3 men simultaneously
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#39
Or you made it up which might have caused you to get another post hidden for using that word.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#42
Yes, you made it up, either you don't understand what was written or you're using it as a smear.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#54
redecorate it any way to you ...being raped by 3 men simultaneously = gang rape
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#57
Wow, that's a really creepy way to look at an essay on gender stereotypes.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#59
yes, the essay was creepy, and I'll make sure the women in my life see it and judge for themselves
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#61
As for me, I feel sorry for women who get slut shamed for their fantasies.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#63
Hey you!!! I do have to call out slut shaming when I see it, women who fantasize are healthier.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#84
All of the open mouthed screaming in this thread over your post made me go and read the essay
Number23
Apr 2016
#228
Must try to minimize it and blow it off as something women would feel good about
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#231
Because many deny the essay exists. Repetition and linking...others can make up their own minds
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#80
The essay on gender stereotypes definitely exists, intelligent people realize it isn't about rape.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#82
Sure, an active fantasy life is very healthy. Oppressing it and slut shaming women not so much.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#74
Shaming the man who presumes to describe/define gang rape fantasy to sell papers is fine
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#85
Ew, your interpretation is really disgusting, who thinks that essay was about rape?
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#92
oh so you've moved on from insulting, me to calling creepy and now disgusting
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#93
Just don't ever do that to me again, it's demeaning and creepy considering the subject matter.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#98
words words words...you sure are suddenly sensitive...I think it's bullshit drama
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#100
And I'm telling you to stop too...there is another subthread you are not letting go
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#104
As long as you don't call me a term of endearment while dicussing rape then you're forgiven.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#107
Women do, stop trying to shame us for having fantasies you disapprove of.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#115
When did I claim to speak for all women? Please stop trying to shame us.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#119
you have made great pains to qualify every other statement...except this one. You say Women
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#122
Women = plural of woman, do you really believe that they don't have these fantasies?
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#124
see...you were fine asking the first sentence. and I imagine there are a few that do
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#132
Well as long as you stop trying to shame us for having a healthy fantasy life you're forgiven.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#134
I never tried in the first place...that was your bullying interpretations making that assumption
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#138
Who said women want to be gang raped? That you would think like that is disgusting.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#174
Bernie said that women fantasize about being gang raped. Shall I attach the article again?
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#177
Bernie didn't say that you did. That is sick, you think that women who fantasize want to be raped?
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#178
some people cannot tell the difference...are you shaming those with mental disabilities?
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#179
Apparently you can't since you keep conflating the two. That is sick.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#180
There's no shame, anyone who conflates fantasies with reality should get help. Hopefully they are.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#182
Well at least you recognize that the former has a problem and needs help. That's progress!
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#184
I can't help it if I'm reminded of creepy sexist guys when I see creepy sexist terms of endearment.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#204
You said it was creepy if tied to rape, otherwise it's simply gender neutral
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#209
It's creepy to keep using a sexist term of endearment after a woman asks you to stop.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#212
For the 8th time it's gender neutral and your dramatic insults are pathetic.
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#213
It's creepy and offensive to continue after a woman asks you to stop, but I still forgive you.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#215
Wow....I call kids, men and women sweetie all the time, you are the one being sexist
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#218
When a woman asks you to stop you should stop, I can't make it any clearer than that.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#220
So no proof of your claim, just more deflection and insults? How SHOCKING!
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#222
Re-read my post - it's easy to understand but get back to me if you need assistance. I'll wait.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#225
That's what I thought. Make an accusation then pretend you don't remember, here you go:
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#230
I never implied I spoke for anyone but myself. Apparently reading comprehension is not your friend
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#216
Look upthread I distinctly and clearly said "I" don't know of a woman what wants to be gang raped.
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#219
That person doesn't know the difference between fantasy and reality.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#244
Yeah, when someone obsesses like that it's best to keep your distance, I'll follow your lead.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#272
I wonder what makes people obsess like that? I probably don't want to know.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#207
Oh my goodness, who called you names again? Better alert on those posts and get busy busy busy!
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#232
How to know this is all an act: when the person hyperventilating can't even spell misogynistic
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#237
Ahhh...the old typo argument. That's valid. Want a link to the creepy essay?
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#239
On the other hand, the board is suddenly reeking with OPs claiming that Bernie is old,
djean111
Apr 2016
#30
It's a primary, ffs. Comparing the positions of candidates on issues is normal.
merrily
Apr 2016
#38
it's not gone unnoticed...bumping up post counts is the least of the reasons n/t
Sheepshank
Apr 2016
#31
You made a post on this thread claiming it was an attack. I replied on this thread accordingly.
merrily
Apr 2016
#189
no not manufactured... she is just not a Liberal and certainly not a Progressive
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#14
A video of Hillary speaking is "manufactured outrage?" Wow. Guess you've never seen an anti-Sanders
merrily
Apr 2016
#41
Just happened last night... now she supports a $15 minimum wage... incredible that anyone votes
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#10
smh. Replies 13 and 18 are about Hillary and The Family, not Obama and The Family.
merrily
Apr 2016
#34
Duh, merrily…I stated CLEARLY that back in 2007-8 we covered The Family and HRC very
blm
Apr 2016
#137
Your Reply 19 could not have been that clear: I'm not the only one who thought it was about
merrily
Apr 2016
#186
She came out boldly for equal rights for gays since forever ago, 2013 to be specific!
merrily
Apr 2016
#32
So, you're saying she should have gotten the Vatican invite instead of Bernie?
brooklynite
Apr 2016
#47
Well they both believed that "marriage is a sacred bond between a man and a woman".
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#51
Hilarious but sad.. Bernie has championed the fight against income inequality for his entire
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#53
And you wonder how the famous gay people like Ellen come to endorse Hillary. . ..
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#58
The recent horrible and untrue statements about AIDS and the Reagans bother me even
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2016
#72
That wasn't an "homophobic" resolution, please stop exploiting lgbt causes to smear Bernie.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#131
ewww... no thank you .. I don't take orders from you.. what is the point you are trying to make
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#150
Spare me your diatribe .. you don't know me.. and you are right about one thing..
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#159
wow.. angry and bitter much... again you don't know me .. and by spewing shit are you talking
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#173
delusional much! If anyone is a troll it's you... as if hillary's record on gay marriage
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#191
More manufactured outrage from the Hillarites.. no respect for me.. that makes a ton of sense
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#164
Welcome to ignore. If your are LGBT you are doing no service to your community with this.
Zira
Apr 2016
#161
And, of course, we should ALWAYS base our principles on how things were in Bedrock:
Ken Burch
Apr 2016
#152
Oh no, Hillary held a different opinion about something in the past from today
anigbrowl
Apr 2016
#190
Some of the most intolerant people are LBGT. I don't begrudge your same sex marriage. Why
Jitter65
Apr 2016
#208
I don't follow.... I stand my ground on equal rights and equal protection under the law
berniepdx420
Apr 2016
#210
are financial unions between politicians and corporate donors also sacred? nt
4ricksren
Apr 2016
#229