2016 Postmortem

iAZZZo

(358 posts)

19. somewhat before 1986, when sanders was going through puberty, i heard

Reply to Name removed (Original post)

Sat Apr 16, 2016, 07:53 PM

Apr 2016

he had a pimple (or two... maybe even more)

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Message auto-removed [View all] Name removed Apr 2016 OP

Imagine people being excited about her only because she is. Punkingal Apr 2016 #1

No imagine needed RobertEarl Apr 2016 #20

Golly! That never occurred to me! That can't be true can it? People only sticking with her becuse brewens Apr 2016 #42

Well, there is that, too. Punkingal Apr 2016 #48

I have been planning for when we all meet up in Hell... ScreamingMeemie Apr 2016 #50

Had Warren run and was doing as well as Bernie, I would have donated at least as much. I would also brewens Apr 2016 #52

i think I will go where the Pope is going. LOL Punkingal Apr 2016 #63

You went back 30 years to find one statement in a campaign? mucifer Apr 2016 #2

I know, I'm shocked ... that sounds more like something a BS cheerleader would do n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #15

I dont see a problem with that. Travis_0004 Apr 2016 #3

I agree. There's nothing sexist in that statement. TheDormouse Apr 2016 #61

It feels like there is some non-negligible amount of people voting for Hillary... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #4

What is sexist about that comment gabeana Apr 2016 #5

She won, you know. athena Apr 2016 #30

Or they bought into identity politics. n/t winter is coming Apr 2016 #37

So that does not prove anything gabeana Apr 2016 #38

That's pretty close to libel about someone you know nothing about. athena Apr 2016 #41

I should of been clearer and apologize for that gabeana Apr 2016 #43

Not every critique of a female is "sexist" DefenseLawyer Apr 2016 #6

No kidding. passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #46

The mental gymnastics required to think that's "sexist" are kinda impressive. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #7

Is this one supposed to fall under "discredit", or "destroy"? Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #45

Oh noooooooooooooooooooo Armstead Apr 2016 #8

Do you have any thing nice to say or did you just join to throw crap awake Apr 2016 #9

He's not throwing crap. He's throwing "crap." n/t Beartracks Apr 2016 #26

Hell, three idiots gave it a rec! arcane1 Apr 2016 #34

I'll go with the throw crap theory. n/t demmiblue Apr 2016 #36

Classy rock Apr 2016 #10

Well, what is there to be enthusiastic or excited about as it relates to Hillary? Tony_FLADEM Apr 2016 #11

"there ain't much." Could just as well been talking about Hillary Clinton. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #12

HRC's supporters epic failing...this is all you got..and the Pope's handshake..oh my.......oh my bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #13

It would be horrible if people were excited about Hillary Clinton only because she's a woman. Autumn Apr 2016 #14

Good grief. Beartracks Apr 2016 #16

1986 frustrated_lefty Apr 2016 #17

Oh shit! Where are my pearls? The Midway Rebel Apr 2016 #18

somewhat before 1986, when sanders was going through puberty, i heard iAZZZo Apr 2016 #19

Hell you think that's bad? passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #47

The comment isn't sexist. nt m-lekktor Apr 2016 #21

Bernie is a sexist bloodthirsty monster who mind controls the Pope and stir-frys homeless kitties. CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #22

"stir-frys homeless kitties." well he is Jewish whistler162 Apr 2016 #27

If Hillary was a man and/or a Republican Kalidurga Apr 2016 #23

You are really reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaccccchhhhhhhing Sky Masterson Apr 2016 #24

LO- melman Apr 2016 #25

Here is an excellent article from the governor's perspective: athena Apr 2016 #28

There are strong simularities in the tone he takes with Hillary now Lucinda Apr 2016 #54

That's not sexist and you know it. arcane1 Apr 2016 #29

It is if it's said about someone who is highly qualified athena Apr 2016 #32

What the fuck is your point? 99Forever Apr 2016 #31

How is that sexist? basselope Apr 2016 #33

Wait. So *not* being crazy about a politician for sexist reasons (she's female) is itself Marr Apr 2016 #35

If you have to go back 30 years TheFarseer Apr 2016 #39

Oh. The horror. jmg257 Apr 2016 #40

It's the hypocrisy. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #49

HES DOOOOOOMED, NOW! Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #44

Kunin was a very harworking progressive leader and he was totally Lucinda Apr 2016 #51

I wish there weren't "much" other than Hillary being a woman magical thyme Apr 2016 #53

Even for someone brand new to this bvf Apr 2016 #55

in 3022 B.C. AgerolanAmerican Apr 2016 #56

That's about what I say about Hillary. I'm a woman who I guess is sexist. Nanjeanne Apr 2016 #57

Another example of McSexism davenelson5555 Apr 2016 #58

"There ain't much." nt msanthrope Apr 2016 #59

This is supposed to be a sexist comment? MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #60

meh. My outrage meter did not move a millimeter. nc4bo Apr 2016 #62