2016 Postmortem

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)

58. Like I said before, the PUMAs thought they were all that too ... they were mistaken

Reply to R. Daneel Olivaw (Reply #57)

Sat Apr 16, 2016, 10:49 PM

Apr 2016

You will be as well.

Buh bye.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

94 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary fights against tuition free college... FREE Prison is ok [View all] Cosmic Kitten Apr 2016 OP

Hillary's supporters are Taxed Enough Already! nt Romulox Apr 2016 #1

Nice lol Cosmic Kitten Apr 2016 #3

Why are you bundling the Clintons? It's offensive as hell. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #2

BOTH supported the tough on crime legislation Cosmic Kitten Apr 2016 #4

HRC is running for President, not Bill. Your OP title was only about Hillary. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #5

So you got nuthin, right? Cosmic Kitten Apr 2016 #21

THEY chose to be married... And HRC truedelphi Apr 2016 #6

Bill's NOT campaigning for her? TheSarcastinator Apr 2016 #8

Two for the price of one. Remember that? Autumn Apr 2016 #16

Are you oblivious gabeana Apr 2016 #24

Why does Hillary take credit then... SHRED Apr 2016 #33

Is your comment relevant to the subject of the OP? Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #37

Hey there Clik, you didn't make the #1 response spot. delrem Apr 2016 #81

Look, people chose Obama last time, because they didn't want Hillary. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #7

And this time they're chosing Secretary Clinton because they don't want BS n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #10

If by "people" you mean the establishment, R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #32

By people, I mean 2+ million more people n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #38

And only a hypocrite would ignor the former for the latter. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #39

Who is ignoring the BS Cheerleaders? One thing those cheerleaders need to remember is SFnomad Apr 2016 #40

All as I have afore mentioned for a very long time. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #41

"Cheating" ... that's sore loser talk at its finest. Buh bye. n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #43

And I expect no less from the cheatery crowd. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #44

The PUMAs thought as highly of themselves 8 years ago ... SFnomad Apr 2016 #45

Hilly has an enthusiasm gap. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #46

If Secretary Clinton has an "enthusiasm gap" ... what does BS have with 2+ million fewer votes? n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #47

Please, bring that lane-assed argument to the general R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #49

And you're making the same lame argument the bitter sore loser PUMAs did SFnomad Apr 2016 #51

Time will tell. Give my regards to her highness. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #52

You people do sound more and more like Republicans all the time ... SFnomad Apr 2016 #54

I speak for myself alone, but I also can see how the R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #55

The ones with any common sense will know which way to vote, they know what's at stake SFnomad Apr 2016 #56

Don't hold your breath. People have a way of not voting R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #57

Like I said before, the PUMAs thought they were all that too ... they were mistaken SFnomad Apr 2016 #58

LOL! R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #59

He's been taking independents by huge margins, and they are now 40% of the electorate n/t eridani Apr 2016 #60

Yet BS is STILL 2+ million voters down ... so he hasn't been taking them by large enough margins SFnomad Apr 2016 #61

So we nominate the candidate who has the worst chance of among the largest sector of votere? eridani Apr 2016 #62

Democrats have spoken ... they don't want BS ... they want Secretary Clinton SFnomad Apr 2016 #63

They want to lose? The RW has a tough time dealing with actual honesty eridani Apr 2016 #64

So, you think Secretary Clinton will bring out the wingers "in droves" .. but that a Socialist won't SFnomad Apr 2016 #65

She has very high unfavorable ratings, and no traction with independents eridani Apr 2016 #68

BS doesn't have traction with real Democrats. Secretary Clinton will do just fine SFnomad Apr 2016 #71

That is irrelevant. Anyone who thinks a candidate can win a GE with 30% of the electorate-- eridani Apr 2016 #72

Anyone that thinks Secretary Clinton is only going to get 30% of the electorate SFnomad Apr 2016 #73

I guess with an inevitable candidate, you don't need to do any phonebanking eridani Apr 2016 #74

Yeah, yeah, yeah ... I don't put much stock in that .. in fact I don't believe much SFnomad Apr 2016 #75

Hey--all the Republicans I know are advocaating for single payer. You too? n/t eridani Apr 2016 #76

It's amazing how you people just jump from subject to subject ... SFnomad Apr 2016 #77

You were the one saying Sanders supporters are like Republicans. If so, why aren't eridani Apr 2016 #78

Yep Sanders supporters sound like Republicans ... SFnomad Apr 2016 #79

Single payer is a right wing talking point? Please explain? n/t eridani Apr 2016 #80

And BS Cheerleaders and right wingnuts feign the same kinds of ignorance n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #85

Give me a url demonstrating that any winger has ever supported single payer n/t eridani Apr 2016 #90

You must be one of the slow ones ... I've never said ANYTHING about single payer SFnomad Apr 2016 #92

No Sanders supporter gives a rat's ass about Benghazi. We do, however criticize Clinton for eridani Apr 2016 #93

Oh well, I tried to type slower ... it didn't work ... buh bye n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #94

And clearly *we* don't want her now Cosmic Kitten Apr 2016 #13

+1 Zira Apr 2016 #69

That's a mightly big stretch - associating the 2. Lil Missy Apr 2016 #9

In other words, just because the OP is true doesn't mean "Lil Missy" wants it discussed! nt Romulox Apr 2016 #12

Two for one, remember? So it's only logical to associate the 2 Autumn Apr 2016 #18

Bill is tied to Hill, with a bullhorn. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #29

The US already runs tuition free colleges Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #11

"And the Union workhouses." demanded Scrooge. "Are they still in operation?" Romulox Apr 2016 #15

Democrats cannot win states with Debbie Wasserman Schultz (DNC) Cosmic Kitten Apr 2016 #17

DWS is not the main problem Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #30

Debbie's Record Scuba Apr 2016 #31

I've no love for her Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #34

She did nothing to turn things around, blamed voters for her failures. Scuba Apr 2016 #35

Debbiecrats: lose elections at all cost. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #48

Other than that, though. Octafish Apr 2016 #36

Military academies are not exactly "tuition-free" Art_from_Ark Apr 2016 #82

Hillary's pal Debbie Wasserman Schultz voted repeatedly to send medical marijuana users to prison. Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #14

DWS is an uncaring, disgusting person. Cosmic Kitten Apr 2016 #19

Student loans are profitable Lone_Wolf Apr 2016 #20

EXACTLY! Cosmic Kitten Apr 2016 #22

Completely false, an outright fabrication of Clinton's position BainsBane Apr 2016 #23

Blah blah blah campaign words Cosmic Kitten Apr 2016 #26

Given she can make the molecular structure of carbon dioxide crooked just by exhaling VulgarPoet Apr 2016 #88

incarceration is not free. 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #25

Bill and Hillary KNOW incarceration makes money. Cosmic Kitten Apr 2016 #27

Yep. You can always follow everything back to money with them. 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #66

War for profit's a pretty nice thing, too villager Apr 2016 #28

And the 1994 crime bill banned Pell Grants for prisoners jfern Apr 2016 #42

Wow-- I never knew that Art_from_Ark Apr 2016 #83

Sophistry at best uponit7771 Apr 2016 #50

Yep. There's always plenty of money for right wingers to give it away to their friends, but never GoneFishin Apr 2016 #53

Strawman Central Dem2 Apr 2016 #67

kr Norrin Radd Apr 2016 #70

typical aspirant Apr 2016 #84

Cornel West had a great comment the other night on Hillary giving back the private prison money BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #86

Prison is Hillary's idea of public housing. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #87

You bet CosmicKitten, it's all about Wall Street! ViseGrip Apr 2016 #89

To be fair, the Clintons like those for-profit universities too... 2cannan Apr 2016 #91