2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: This is NOT first time Sanders camp feinged or faked some type of endorsement or proxy credibility [View all]passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)And not everyone agrees with you that his campaign (not Sanders personally) tried to imply that he had been endorsed when he hadn't been. It was kinda like this fiasco of all the accusations you've thrown at Bernie over this trip. His campaign made a mistake in including logos on some of their literature without prior permission, but they were not claiming endorsements, just support. If they meant endorse they would have said endorse. And Bernie did not do it. Get over it.
Nothing about this Rome trip has been disingenuous either. Bernie never lied about a thing, yet you all continued to say that he did, as one item after another you were proven wrong...and now even with proof you refuse to let go of your smears because you will never admit you were wrong.
When I make a mistake here, I admit it. When I see something stupid or untrue being said about Clinton, I stand up for her, even though I don't like her, because to me lying about someone is wrong. I can't understand how people can be so filled with hate that they just ignore the truth and keep perpetuating lies in the face of proof to the contrary.
It's like talking to a fucking brick wall here.
And now I'm going to bed before my feet swell up any more than they already have for staying up too late...I should have been in bed hours ago, but I was so pissed at the absolute intransigence of some of you that I just couldn't let it go. I'm sorry I even let you drag me into this crap.
That's all this attack on Bernie and his trip to Rome is. Pure unadulterated crap.
Goodnight!