Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Definitive PROOF emerges that Hillary knowingly lied about Saddam's WMDs to Senate, public [View all]Faux pas
(16,356 posts)54. Kickin' for the truth!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Definitive PROOF emerges that Hillary knowingly lied about Saddam's WMDs to Senate, public [View all]
EdwardBernays
Apr 2016
OP
She is a follower, not a leader - and look which cronies she follows. eom
Betty Karlson
Apr 2016
#11
Doesn't this make her just as much a war criminal as Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, et al?
Scuba
Apr 2016
#13
re: "obvious question is, did Hillary read the NIE...Turns out, the answer is a resounding yes!"
thesquanderer
Apr 2016
#16
They were given only 2 days to read the 92 page report, still not holding her 100% for it....
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#17
Even so, it was a stupid vote ... she's changed... Sanders? Not so much, that's one reason he doesnt
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#25
even so, you just pulled your comment above, about her not having it until
Schema Thing
Apr 2016
#52
Sanders voted for coporations to have lawsuit immunity too. It's been nearly a year and Sanders camp
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#27
But you'd sue em if you knew they could prevent a drunk driver from driving and choose not to...
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#85
Automans aren't trying to make a dangerous weapon more dangerous either. It doesn't matter at
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#88
That is complete bullshit. He did not vote for corporations to have lawsuit immunity.
cui bono
Apr 2016
#72
Whether the suite has merit is up to the magistrate or pretrial not congress or Sanders. Sell out
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#86
I don't hate Hillary Clinton so its different for me, I understand you don't trust her
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#94
So you are totally fine with her lying about classified info in order to get us into a war?
cui bono
Apr 2016
#95
Again, I don't hate her so her every breath isn't to do evil. I don't think she lied to get us into
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#96
No, I'm purposely ignoring hatred of a person and what people who hate call facts which
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#99
"Hillary knowing lied" is a proffering that is in dispute. Again, the hater RARELY if ever proffer
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#101
So you didn't read the OP. I see. Posting from ignorance is a stupid thing to do.
cui bono
Apr 2016
#103
This story has pretty much been ignored by MSM just like most the worst Clinton stories are...
Kalidurga
Apr 2016
#29
The AUMF targeted the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11, was Iraq involved?
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#48
Hillary admitted in an earlier debate to selling her vote for IW to Bush in exchange
2banon
Apr 2016
#56
Well she is the candidate who has received more money from the oil industry than ANY OTHER candidate
cui bono
Apr 2016
#57
Could be, I also wonder how many of those corporations donated to her campaign and foundation?
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#70
Keep digging...now back to 14 years ago. How much further are you guys willing to go?
George II
Apr 2016
#65
She still wants more war. The question is how much further are YOU willing to go?
cui bono
Apr 2016
#75