Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The long-standing outrage about closed primaries [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)67. None of those links ...
... are relevant to my OP. I don't see anyone screaming that closed Dem primaries are unfair, un-democratic, or represent voter surpression.
Where did I say, "Nobody ever complained before, so why should I care now?"
What I am pointing out is that many posters who are now complaining about the "unfairness" of closed Dem primaries since Bernie entered the race showed absolutely no concern about them until they realized that Bernie fares better in open primaries.
It's just another example of how Bernie supporters believe that long-standing rules and procedures should be changed for his benefit.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yep. So outraged, they forgot to check how they actually registered. Probably voted for Nader 2000.
Hoyt
Apr 2016
#4
Entitled snowflakes that do not believe they have to follow any rules, having a collective tantrum.
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#6
Plus a freaking million. SO sick of these whining people and so ready for the primaries to be over
Number23
Apr 2016
#94
not only that - we (Dems) should bend the rules for them, and of course, be aware and
DrDan
Apr 2016
#20
It Might Be Time for Special VIP Gift Bags to BEG Super Vote Sanders Supporters to Vote Democratic
Stallion
Apr 2016
#50
If they were as involved with politics as they say they are... HOW COULD THEY NOT ALREADY KNOW?
NurseJackie
Apr 2016
#10
2.5 million more people SO FAR!!1! conspiring against Sanders than not conspiring against Sanders.
Squinch
Apr 2016
#27
Yeah, surprising that all of a sudden this is a major issue. I posted this a little while ago....
George II
Apr 2016
#13
I don't recall any of the complaints I hear today back in those days either.
LiberalFighter
Apr 2016
#36
Not seeing any outrage in there. But you knew that. Shocked that your post is dishonest.
Squinch
Apr 2016
#18
I don't think outrage means what you think it means. NH still has open primaries.
Squinch
Apr 2016
#25
I've been neck deep in the zero posts that blamed Kerry for Iraq in the 2004 campaign.
Squinch
Apr 2016
#15
Yep. But Sanders isn't responsible for casualties of the weapons systems HE voted for.
Squinch
Apr 2016
#60
They've become unpopular because the system has been corrupted. Of course you are ok with the
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#16
This is shitting on Independents? Gracious! Independents must be very sensitive. And they
Squinch
Apr 2016
#29
Now you are sounding just like Republicans defending their trying to make it harder to vote.
Odin2005
Apr 2016
#41
You sound like you don't understand the difference between "using your own free will to choose
Squinch
Apr 2016
#57
Neither Obama or Clinton were drawing a sizable contingent of Paul supporters.
NCTraveler
Apr 2016
#38
The DNC never gamed the primary system to favor a specific candidate - Hillary Clinton -
PufPuf23
Apr 2016
#69
One reason for closed primaries-GOP voters- for example- Did Rush Limbaugh Tilt Result In Indiana?
Gothmog
Apr 2016
#87
That's okay... someday all 50 states will be progressive enough to allow same-day registration.
cherokeeprogressive
Apr 2016
#88
With the current rules in some states where even republicans can crossover and vote in the
Thinkingabout
Apr 2016
#90