Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary folks DO REALIZE that Hillary will be found to have deliberately violated the FOIA, RIGHT? [View all]Tarc
(10,476 posts)127. I love that my indictment fairy creation is now the #3 google image search for the term
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary folks DO REALIZE that Hillary will be found to have deliberately violated the FOIA, RIGHT? [View all]
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
OP
You're confusing the criminal case investigation and the numerous civil suits. I agree it's unlikely
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#12
I don't either, but that's like saying "I don't see a stroke as having the same impact as cancer"
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#38
She violated her signed Classified Info Nondisclose Agreement. That was a serious felony violation.
leveymg
Apr 2016
#85
She violated the terms of her signed classified info nondisclose agreement. This is criminal.
leveymg
Apr 2016
#83
As someone who makes regular FOIA requests for work, this whole story really aggravates me
Ash_F
Apr 2016
#4
If you have a PACER account, you can get these public court orders and court transcripts there for a
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#17
Judicial Watch is your source of choice. Nice. I actually like the transparency.
NCTraveler
Apr 2016
#23
No, my links are to (1) a court order, (2) a court transcript, (3) The Guardian (a liberal paper),
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#16
People who believe in transparency and the knowledge they are being ratfucked.
NCTraveler
Apr 2016
#62
Sure. lol. Stick with that. Not the reality that it is their go-to source. nt.
NCTraveler
Apr 2016
#66
The links are to court orders and transcripts. You can find them on for-pay government websites or
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#58
If it means giving free acess to public documents, I don't care whose site it is.
JimDandy
Apr 2016
#61
There are 38 separate civil suits. JW is just one. There's also a criminal FBI investigation
leveymg
Apr 2016
#90
She is too selfish to care that her over ambitiousness is endangering our government
Vote2016
Apr 2016
#131
You can read the court order yourself. That's why I linked it. So - technically - it is the judges
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#78
Did you have a different interpretation of "wrong-doing and bad faith" or "constantly shifting
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#92
Tell yourself that a federal judge finding "wrong-doing and bad faith" is a non-story fake scandal
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#95
Is the difference between the civil cases and the criminal investigation beyond your grasp? There is
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#105
You "suppose it could happen"? You know that there are already more than 3 dozen cases pending?
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#132
You understand that over 3 dozen cases CURRENTLY pending is not a "prediction," right?
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#136
No, but I certainly support the Associated Press's right to enforce the FOIA. Don't you?
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#139
Right wing websites like The Guardian, Huffington Post, WikiPedia, NPR, etc.?
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#141
Why is it that the questionable situations are now brought to light so late in the game?
Paper Roses
Apr 2016
#9
The DoJ is waiting on the FBI. The FBI is reportedly just months from making a recommendation.
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#22
I agree. Hillary RECEIVED emails that show a criminal violation of the law. I haven't seen where she
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#19
He almost certainly did, but that source wasn't Hillary because Sid was leaking information TO her
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#47
The late Tyler Drumheller, former head of the CIA's European Division who exposed "Curveball".
leveymg
Apr 2016
#91
These are court orders and court transcripts. That's not "random internet chatter"
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#26
Don't feed them. Put them on ignore if you cant ignore them. They are in their glory
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#129
Lawrence O'Donnell: "They’re using the Bush standard as the defense of Hillary. "
think
Apr 2016
#28
I'm not a psychic - I'm literate. I linked the court order. You can read it yourself.
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#41
Please unmute your voice and feel free to speak to the issues that inspire you.
JimDandy
Apr 2016
#107
Both issues (classified material and pay-to-play) are serious problems,
winter is coming
Apr 2016
#103
Thanks. I had to reschedule some things set up in downtown Houston this week, but otherwise, all is
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#49
Fines, legal fees, and penalties will likely be assessed against the State Department, not Hillary.
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#45
More likely that Sanders to be found to be "full of shit" by most of the dem electorate no?
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#44
This has nothing to do with Sanders. The Democratic electorate loves Sanders:
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#48
You're right, we love his full of shitness and don't take it seriously and that's why he's losing by
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#50
You know the "Hillary's winning by millions of votes" meme totally ignores a bunch of caucus states,
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#51
I'm not saying she's unfit for office. I'm just saying she's not the basket to put all our eggs in.
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#53
Violating FIOA is about HIDING documents from American citizens, not LEAKING documents to foreign
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#67
From what I understand, that "hiding" documents from the government is a crime
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#81
It doesn't matter if the AG actually indicts. The FBI report will sink her candidacy.
leveymg
Apr 2016
#111
I have not heard evidence of criminal conduct. I have heard the FBI plans to recommend indictment
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#94
Here is Hillary's Security Oath and the statute it references, 18 USC Sec. 793. Go ahead and read
leveymg
Apr 2016
#117
If Obama threatened to veto releasing the "28 pages", there's no chance in hell
floriduck
Apr 2016
#80
That's part of the distinction between civil law and criminal law. Civil law, you just need to show
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#100
Are you saying you havea reasonable doubt that Hillary traded classified docs over a private server?
leveymg
Apr 2016
#112
In that youtube link I provided they said she exchanged classified email which she had
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#121
What FOIA rule or law was broken? Do you even know what info FOIA applies to?
Jitter65
Apr 2016
#114
Thoughtful, well-written OP, Attorney in Texas. S/B morally persuasive to genuine liberals.
senz
Apr 2016
#120
I love that my indictment fairy creation is now the #3 google image search for the term
Tarc
Apr 2016
#127
I wonder if moveon.org will come to Hillary's aid when she is indicted. They formed as a group
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#130
Judicial Watch's case is not the only one. There are 38 (or more). Is the Associated Press part of
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#138