Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(17,064 posts)

3. A tax-free 'charity' slush fund is much more lucrative than cattle futures...

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 10:49 PM

Apr 2016

...and sketchy real estate developments. But the Clintons motivation for self-enrichment while supposedly serving the public always remains.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Aiding and abetting potentially indicted people [View all] Arizona Roadrunner Apr 2016 OP

Good article farleftlib Apr 2016 #1

Hillary would be SO much more vulnerable in the GE than Bernie. 99th_Monkey Apr 2016 #2

Yes they've upped their game considerably since the 90's farleftlib Apr 2016 #5

Yep. A charity which, according to audited records COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #11

Like Dolores Huerta's charity, to buy her services. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #13

You might direct those questions to the Clinton Foundation. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #14

Not quite. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #15

Clap for the Indictment Fairy in order to prolong your false hope. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #4

No one wants this drek in our party CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #8

What an incredibly unamerican thing to say. displacedtexan Apr 2016 #7

Good luck with that position Arizona Roadrunner Apr 2016 #9

All people are "potentially indicted people." YouDig Apr 2016 #10

Congratulations for making clear the falsity and COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #12

Guilty of poor judgment Arizona Roadrunner Apr 2016 #16

I always wondered how someone could call them self a republican insta8er Apr 2016 #17

Not to mention this: Contrary1 Apr 2016 #18