2016 Postmortem

aspirant

(3,533 posts)

10. Hillary gets things done,

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 03:32 AM

Apr 2016

here's one waiting to happen, Go Get'um HC

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I spoke to my State Senator tonight... [View all] brooklynite Apr 2016 OP

I understand that the lower house actually passed a bill Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #1

This is why it's so important to get out the vote at state level. grossproffit Apr 2016 #2

With the special election isn't that more likely now? nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #3

If I was a New Yorker LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #4

Change Possible , Dems may now control the State Senate HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #5

First you have to get IDC and Simcha Felder to rejoin the Democratic Majority brooklynite Apr 2016 #6

But a second ago it was 'Republicans control the Senate' and now it's 'Democrats are the problem'? Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #30

Yep...its the same everywhere. And why all Dem races are important. Lucinda Apr 2016 #7

Garsh, Sha-zam, Gall-lee! Segami Apr 2016 #8

Good of you to mention it. Hopefully he will speak out more and fight for change. Thank you again think Apr 2016 #9

Hillary gets things done, aspirant Apr 2016 #10

Cool story Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #11

Ahem. I believe it's "Cool story, bro." dchill Apr 2016 #27

Fascinating!!! Had no idea they had a say how Democratic's vote in THEIR Primaries. Joob Apr 2016 #12

If you want an open primary- the GOP has to get on board with the changes too. bettyellen Apr 2016 #14

"Messing with" implies that changes were made in time for this Primary... brooklynite Apr 2016 #15

Well now you know. That's why some state parties prefer caucuses Recursion Apr 2016 #16

So in the GE and Congressional elections set-up as state caucuses, aspirant Apr 2016 #19

Only for party elections, not actual elections (nt) Recursion Apr 2016 #20

How can "party ELECTIONS" not be "actual ELECTIONS" aspirant Apr 2016 #21

Because they're the internal decisionmaking process of private corporations Recursion Apr 2016 #22

Aren't cities, states and even the District of Columbia incorporated aspirant Apr 2016 #24

Indeed, the Constitution gives considerable deference to all of those (except of course DC) Recursion Apr 2016 #26

So if private corporations (parties and Government) aspirant Apr 2016 #31

They do Recursion Apr 2016 #32

.... aspirant Apr 2016 #33

Seriously? Because that's a Federal election Recursion Apr 2016 #34

Does the November election (GE) include senators, house members etc aspirant Apr 2016 #35

I literally don't understand what you're saying. People vote for Electoral College members Recursion Apr 2016 #36

... aspirant Apr 2016 #37

Because November is for a public election Recursion Apr 2016 #38

state "public election" aspirant Apr 2016 #39

Well, again, for the most part they are Recursion Apr 2016 #41

"for the most part" aspirant Apr 2016 #43

actually they do dsc Apr 2016 #23

Well, this makes sense. octoberlib Apr 2016 #13

Does the New York assembly control Democratic primaries? Vinca Apr 2016 #17

Thanks. In WI more restrictions on dates and hours polls are open has happened also. Walker riversedge Apr 2016 #18

I haven't blamed Hillary... hootinholler Apr 2016 #25

Based on what I am hearing it looks like more HRC suppirters in Brooklyn were disenfranchised. hrmjustin Apr 2016 #28

NY State Democrat: 'Republicans won't let us have democracy'. Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #29

So now you are wanting an open primary. . . B Calm Apr 2016 #40

I blame her for her silence all along this primary. How about standing up and saying no delegates ViseGrip Apr 2016 #42

I actually started a post yesterday....... Amaril Apr 2016 #44