2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: What specific POLICY POSITIONS show Sec. Clinton to be "Not Liberal" or "Not a Democrat?" [View all]Sparkly
(24,816 posts)all abbreviations for mischaracterizations and accusations.
Fracking -- she has a comprehensive energy plan; puts strict regulations on fracking that would protect people; combined with her broader plan, she wants to end it. (By contrast, by the way, Sanders' energy "plan" has been criticized as doing more harm than good... Refute "Mr. Sanders's War on Clean Energy" by the WaPo Editorial Board: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mr-sanderss-war-on-clean-energy/2016/04/18/f2e0cef0-05ac-11e6-a12f-ea5aed7958dc_story.html
"The Banks" -- I am not sure what this means. Is is that she hasn't said she'll "break up the big banks" as though there were a hatchet at hand to do it? Her plan actually goes much further, taking on the big banks AND other industries: https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/wall-street/
"Use of military force" -- This is history, and I won't argue the distortions. It's easy to say "She loves war! She supports killing children!" which is ABSURD. I'll just say that she is the most knowledgeable and experienced candidate on foreign policy we've seen in --- maybe ever. Her policies on national security: https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/national-security/
Nothing in any of that that deserves the demonization of her as a "Centrist DINO Rightwing" whatever.