2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: What specific POLICY POSITIONS show Sec. Clinton to be "Not Liberal" or "Not a Democrat?" [View all]IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)I would even support constitutional action on REASONABLE RESTRICTIONS.
The problem we are having is she didn't say NO, and then SHE brought up her willingness to negotiate with Republicans about messing with the Constitution.
When asked a "yes or no" question, she PANDERED. She counts on Planned Parenthood cover for we pro-choice people, and the "Chuck Todd" viewer to understand her "I'm flexible - we can negotiate, as long as life of the mother is taken into consideration."
It means I can't trust her because she might not be pandering to the right - she might be pandering to Planned Parenthood and I am not willing to take a chance on it.
Again, you asked. And I also ask again, LGBT - you've probably already seen the video: "Should New York recognize gay marriages?" NO! She certainly knew how to be definitive then. And as someone who has been saying "yes" to that for a very long time, her "jump on the bandwagon" style infuriates me.
You may trust her. I don't. Do you understand my logic, even if you don't agree with it?