Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I do not accept the results of any of the caucuses [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)51. No one is disenfranchised in Wash the State. What better time to get together than
at a caucus? There were 300 people at the high school where we held about 28 precinct caucuses. We discussed our county and state platforms. We talked about local elections and candidates.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I agree caucuses are undemocratic and unrepresentative, they should be completely banned
tritsofme
Apr 2016
#5
Handicapped, the aged, those who can't get off work for hours, college kids who might have classes
Dem2
Apr 2016
#17
That's all a bunch of crap. One can vote absentee. At least in Washington the State.
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#21
I have participated for many years and what you say is untrue. I ran a caucus. I oversaw the
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#37
I am going to have to guess your point. So those states that use the caucus system,
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#39
We like that people get out to participate in the process. We discuss party platforms
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#47
you can do that without disenfranchising people who can't afford to spend that time
dsc
Apr 2016
#48
No one is disenfranchised in Wash the State. What better time to get together than
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#51
And you think those states that don't care to count absentees for caucuses
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#40
It would be much easier to introduce absentee to their current system but they won't
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#45
And I bet you can rationalize away the deaths of American troops (none from the almighty Ruling
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#31
Very funny. I work with the homeless and think the hubris of those that support the
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#36
Washington has a caucus, the Democratic Party sued the State to be allowed to have one...
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2016
#24