Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
40. Yes, Sanders unilaterially disarmed - and you are misinfrormed.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:01 PM
Apr 2016

Thus fare Sanders has raised %182,923,991 and Hillary has raised $182,242,497 so they have raised almost exactly the same money. The Sanders campaign has spent 91% of the money available while the Clinton campaign has spent 84% of their available cash, so it is Sanders not Hillary which is cash strapped.

While several of Bernie's biggest donors exceeded their $2,500 limited long ago, his donations averaged only $27 which means that most of his donation were quite small. That indicates the most of those donating can't afford to give much and if they continue to give they are going to reach their limits.

The problem is that the $183 K which Sanders raised is but a drop in the bucket compared to what he would need in the general election. In 2012, $2 Billion dollars was spent on the Presidential election and the majority was spent during the general election and this year even more money is likely to be spent. That's when TV commercial have to run nationwide, not just one state at a time. Where is Sanders going to raise. The Koch brothers and friends alone are planning to spend almost $1 Billion dollars backing Republican candidates in 2016 through their PAC. How could Sanders counter all all of that money without a pack of his own?

However, that isn't all of Hillary's fund raising; there is also the Hillary Victory fund:

CNN: $182 million: Bernie Sanders equals Hillary Clinton's campaign fundraising

Clinton also raises money for the "Hillary Victory Fund," a federal joint fundraising committee operated between the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee, and a number of state parties. The fund has raised $60 million through the end of March and has transferred $12.7 million to the Clinton campaign. Any funds raised by a joint fundraising committee are divided among the sponsoring campaigns and parties using a predetermined allocation formula.

Sanders has his own joint fundraising committee with the DNC, the "Bernie Victory Fund," but as of March that account remained essentially inactive.

And Hillary also has her Super PAC to which rich Democratic donors can contributed an unlimited amount of money.

Clinton also has the support of outside groups known as "Super PACs," which can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money in support or opposition to a candidate but may not coordinate directly with a campaign. The primary Super PAC supporting Clinton is Priorities USA, which has raised more than $55 million in 2015 and 2016.

So Bernie Sanders unilaterally disarmed. But not to worry, he only has to fund his campaign through the convention because after that he's done.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Hillary corruption straw man. [View all] Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 OP
The simple truth is most (99%) of American politicians do nothing to help corporate Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #2
The Clinton Foundation is where the sales take place GreatGazoo Apr 2016 #3
I would consider nichomachus Apr 2016 #4
+100 - Thank you. Money laundering is exactly this it is about. nt 99th_Monkey Apr 2016 #19
How about Boeing and The Saudi's Donations to the Clinton Foundation? WDIM Apr 2016 #5
I agree. Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #7
The UBS bank IRS intervention while SoS is another. Bill then got $1.5 million to speak to UBS think Apr 2016 #8
There seems to be many instances WDIM Apr 2016 #10
It's also not the only question. She DID NOT vote as SOS. But she had power OVER a lot of other Skwmom Apr 2016 #6
Your use of the term "straw man" is sexist. ;) reformist2 Apr 2016 #9
LOL, good one. n/t Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #11
The question remains, what bill or bills can you point to has influenced Hillary's Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #12
Elizabeth Warren answered your question on Bill Moyers years ago. n/t Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #13
Are you referring to the bankruptcy bill? Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #14
Elizabeth has her version, Hillary has hers: Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #15
Again, are you referring to the bankruptcy bill? Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #16
UBS Octafish Apr 2016 #17
That is quite a rogue's gallery. n't Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #33
The deal let the other 47k Swiss acc't holders off the hook. leveymg Apr 2016 #38
Why don't you make it even simpler. "Have you personally ever seen cash being transferred rhett o rick Apr 2016 #22
Several come to mind. basselope Apr 2016 #25
Ah, the claim Hillary voted for the bankruptcy bill. On the day the bankruptcy Bill was Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #31
False. basselope Apr 2016 #32
That Bill did not pass. Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #34
So? basselope Apr 2016 #36
Inside the beltway sphincter, the cash and the access... pat_k Apr 2016 #18
Excellent point Armstead Apr 2016 #20
This is a classic for the ages: Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2016 #21
Thanks Hassin. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #24
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #23
Translation: I have absolutely no evidence that Hillary was... CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #26
Why do they give the money? Patriotism? n/t Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #29
Consideration CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #35
Unilateral disarmament?? Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #39
Yes, Sanders unilaterially disarmed - and you are misinfrormed. CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #40
The unprecedented Hillary Victory Fund is an ongoing criminal conspiracy. Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #41
After all, big banks often give money to just about anybody, without thinking of asking for anything Romulox Apr 2016 #27
true; but in HRC's case, there are some fairly blatant examples; someone amborin Apr 2016 #28
As I conceded upthread, her SOS tenure apparently included foreign government pay to play. Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #30
LOL. It's such a stupid question. The whole system is pay-to-play. mhatrw Apr 2016 #37
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Hillary corruption st...»Reply #40