What specific POLICY POSITIONS show Sec. Clinton to be "Not Liberal" or "Not a Democrat?"

[kaleckim]

446. So, essentially

what you want is for us to ignore her decades long history (I started from the start of her career and went to the present, so a consistent, decades long record) and to instead go to her web page to see all the wonderful things she promises to do. That, again, relies on people trusting her and ignoring her actual record and the fact that she is largely bankrolled by giant corporations, their lobbyists and the rich. It isn't my fault, or anyone else's fault on the left that doesn't support her (should be everyone), that you chose a candidate with her record, as corrupt as she is, and that you chose a candidate that isn't trusted. You did though, and you cannot defend her, you just want to put your fingers in your ears and go "la la la" when someone says something (factual) that you don't like.

Again, you wouldn't accept your logic if a Republican said it, you wouldn't, nor should you.