2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: If Bernie isn't a "real" Dem, why does he owe Hillary any allegiance? [View all]riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)And "calm down"? Could you be any more condescending?
That wasn't the tone I took from this (what I thought was a fairly respectful) discussion.
Some last points:
On Nader being falsely accused of throwing the election:
Here's a good overview. ..
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/6/1260721/-The-Nader-Myth
Here's an analysis with more links to source data...
http://disinfo.com/2010/11/debunked-the-myth-that-ralph-nader-cost-al-gore-the-2000-election/
I find your conclusion that Hillary's unicorns are so much more believable than Bernies to be unjustified. I laid out exactly how her tax credit proposals are flawed. I've pointed out that Hillary will face the exact same Congress.
You have conveniently ignored those points and simply reiterated your views that Bernies unicorns are a con.
Well then it's impossible not to make the comparison that Hillary's proposals are cons as well....
Or we agree that these kinds of proposals are what candidates do and go forward from that point.