2016 Postmortem

creeksneakers2

(8,016 posts)

25. Why would the Clintons break the law to get travel?

Sun Apr 24, 2016, 11:05 PM

Apr 2016

They travel all the time already. Hillary logged more miles than any other Secretary of State. A night at home would be a luxury for them, not travel.

Friends and associates on the payroll look bad when you look at it that way, but the Clintons run the foundation and its normal for people running an operation to turn to people they know and trust to work for them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

LOL - Snopes unable to debunk accusation of Clinton Foundation money-laundering [View all] FourScore Apr 2016 OP

2. Foreign oligarch's rpannier Apr 2016 #1

They debunked the author but not the content!! FourScore Apr 2016 #2

I read the piece andx I know what they said rpannier Apr 2016 #3

Most americans don't even know who he is. n/t FourScore Apr 2016 #5

Oh, Krauthammer is capable of writing dogshit like that. Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #7

I can see him saying that about Obama rpannier Apr 2016 #9

Which foreign oligarch's what? Ghost Dog Apr 2016 #13

That's not what it says at all! procon Apr 2016 #4

Yeah. Since January. So they are unable to debunk it. FourScore Apr 2016 #6

If there's nothing to substantiate, then why are you spreading rumors procon Apr 2016 #16

There is something to substantiate it. It's in the emails. BillZBubb Apr 2016 #31

Oh is it? It's in the emails , is it? Where? Do you have them? puffy socks Apr 2016 #58

It hasn't been proven either since January. puffy socks Apr 2016 #57

That's not what is says creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #8

Thank you jehop61 Apr 2016 #11

The Clintons don't take salaries. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #12

Why would the Clintons break the law to get travel? creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #25

Hillary logged fewer miles than Condi Rice -- and Kerry has exceeded both of them karynnj Apr 2016 #37

You sound like you really know what you are talking about creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #47

I did not say they did karynnj Apr 2016 #49

With 11% of the Foundations money going to administration COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #35

Saudis gave $10 million to the Foundation prior to Clinton okaying arms deal. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #38

You know that all arms deals have to be approved by the Senate COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #40

All that Saudi money creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #48

Everything I have read indicates all is not well with that foundation. You might wanna 'look into it Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #15

I've been looking into it creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #24

Sure... Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #26

I also just burst out laughing reading that eloquent and convincing reply... FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #41

You might want to notify snopes.com of your findings. dchill Apr 2016 #27

They are probably very busy creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #28

Well, I'm sure you'll take a closer look. dchill Apr 2016 #29

Sure you have! And with an open mind too! We believe you! BillZBubb Apr 2016 #32

I've decided Hillary was wrong many times creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #44

Your credentials are surely unimpeachable, FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #42

I'm not an authority creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #62

What are you reading? Read the ratings of the... LAS14 Apr 2016 #51

The Clinton Foundation is at least partly used to launder money for the Clintons and their friends. Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #52

Baloney! LAS14 Apr 2016 #55

You asked for a source, I gave you Mother Jones, you say "Baloney!" David Brock would be proud. Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #59

"Wonderful things" depending on which side of the "thing" you're on, ask the Haitians. That Guy 888 Apr 2016 #17

You are picking out one thing creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #23

What happens when you ask someone who makes a profit if their profits are ethically earned? That Guy 888 Apr 2016 #33

I don't see what's wrong creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #45

Of course, nothing wrong with AIDs and Hepatitus tainted blood being sold. That Guy 888 Apr 2016 #60

Haiti turned out exactly as intended. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #39

I'll ask you the same question creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #46

Another attempt by the fake "Democrats" to take down out likely Democratic candidate? Dem2 Apr 2016 #19

The Clinton Foundation is a public -not private- charity. There are laws regarding that. randome Apr 2016 #10

Totaly right Gwhittey Apr 2016 #14

Ha! mmonk Apr 2016 #18

As I have said before, there is no law that says that everything that Sanders supporters say has to Squinch Apr 2016 #20

How could they? That's often what rich people foundations are for. JackRiddler Apr 2016 #21

You can easily tell that Krauthammer didn't write this demwing Apr 2016 #22

So other than the facts that... Sparkly Apr 2016 #30

False. Snopes merely says that it is unable to attribute the e-mail COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #34

Our structure, with the collusion of the Clinton's is just so bad! ViseGrip Apr 2016 #36

Tammany Hall. Look it up. closeupready Apr 2016 #43

We're witnessing the birth of a smear. LAS14 Apr 2016 #50

Absolutely. This is the type of crap we would normally see COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #53

Anyone can make an accusation. lovemydog Apr 2016 #54

It's not really an accusation Aerows Apr 2016 #56

So guilty... JSup Apr 2016 #61