2016 Postmortem

berniepdx420

(1,784 posts)

38. thanks for the name calling..it's delightful..I've been quite clear and direct..

Tue Apr 26, 2016, 06:50 AM

Apr 2016

I'm sad that you don't see how corrupt and paid for your candidate is.. it saddens me that the concentration of wealth, money in politics and many more wars is what comes with your candidate.. I like Democracy not Oligarchy and Plutocracy...

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question: What's the penalty for erasing Classified Materials ? [View all] berniepdx420 Apr 2016 OP

It depends, are you some random underling, or a very very very important person? jfern Apr 2016 #1

for arguments sake ..lets say a very very very important person berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #4

Well, that many verys, you might as well be above the law! nt VulgarPoet Apr 2016 #53

Depends. Kentonio Apr 2016 #2

I'm rooting for Justice !! berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #5

Depends... Is your surname Clinton? peacebird Apr 2016 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #6

we shall see.. no matter.. we will see you at the convention.. berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #8

/ berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #24

misogynists.. thats is a knee slapper.. if you only knew how funny that is... gender baiting .. berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #31

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #33

wrong again..sis berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #37

The tumblr delegation would like to remind you that if you have policy reasons for opposing Clinton VulgarPoet Apr 2016 #54

Yeah, good luck with that! NT Adrahil Apr 2016 #10

Why thank you.. and good luck with your candidate's FBI criminal investigation for a berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #25

No.. I enjoy my emoticons.. sorry berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #29

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #32

thanks for the name calling..it's delightful..I've been quite clear and direct.. berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #38

I swear I just thought that! obamanut2012 Apr 2016 #21

If it were me, probably life. For others, meh...it's just a thing. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #9

Really, no..... Adrahil Apr 2016 #12

On the other hand, you have presumed the entirety of the case(s). And ignored silvershadow Apr 2016 #16

I haven't assumed anything. Adrahil Apr 2016 #17

No, we just think ANYONE else would have immediately done the honorable thing for party. silvershadow Apr 2016 #26

It's a political witch hunt. Adrahil Apr 2016 #27

Well they found one didn't they? You think I deserve to be caught up in it? silvershadow Apr 2016 #28

No, I don't think so. Adrahil Apr 2016 #40

So she doesn't owe a certain level of respect to me or the party members? Is that silvershadow Apr 2016 #43

What? I don't even know what that has to do with our conversation. Adrahil Apr 2016 #45

Ok. Does she owe a certain level of respect to me or to the other party members? silvershadow Apr 2016 #48

Of course she does. That doesn't mean she has to do what you want. Adrahil Apr 2016 #49

Her very candidacy is a disrespect of epic proportions. Anyone else would have silvershadow Apr 2016 #50

Lol! zappaman Apr 2016 #66

Its the FBI.. not Congress.. no witch hunt here.. nice try though.. care to try again ? berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #39

How snarky! Adrahil Apr 2016 #42

Wrong on the first point.. not initiated by Congressional Republicans... berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #44

Secret Service? The Secret Service has nothing to do with this. NT Adrahil Apr 2016 #47

You are correct.. i miss spoke..it was not the Secret Service it was NSA.. please correct the record berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #51

I think purposefully circumventing the Secret Service and putting a server in your personal berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #34

Looking at the example of Chelsea Manning for me? VulgarPoet Apr 2016 #55

Depends on when the material was classified. And, if it was ERASED and not shared Jitter65 Apr 2016 #13

over half were erased after they were requested from State.. luckily the FBI was able to recover berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #20

The Presidency. Sorry Sanders lost. Nt NCTraveler Apr 2016 #15

Not yet my friend.. not yet.. see you at the Convention berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #18

You're going to the convention? NCTraveler Apr 2016 #23

and snark you too berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #35

My bad. I thought your op was mocking... NCTraveler Apr 2016 #52

we have found out the hard way the Clinton News Network (CNN) wont berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #60

Won't cover what? nt. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #61

any new (leaked) information from the FBI's Criminal Investigation berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #62

ok. Now I know you are making fun of our new Fox News crowd. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #63

....you .... berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #64

Hold on. I can't hear you. I'm doing business with China. nt. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #67

Sometimes, late at night, when the raccoons begin to rustle and the birds begin to dream... randome Apr 2016 #19

We shall see.. and we'll see you at the convention.. berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #22

Yes we sure will. It will be a raucous event. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #30

Another tweet suffering from delusions of grandure by masqurading as an OP. JoePhilly Apr 2016 #36

Theoretically beedle Apr 2016 #41

well said berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #46

Sanders fans still hoping for an 11th-hour indictment save? Tarc Apr 2016 #56

You haven't heard Tarc.. the investigation has branched out to berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #59

Clap real hard! Tarc Apr 2016 #68

can you hear that from your view point..... berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #69

Well, I'm sorry you feel that way Tarc Apr 2016 #71

Depends on who you are Bettie Apr 2016 #57

That is contingent on who you are dr60omg Apr 2016 #58

Depends on who the president is. Unicorn Apr 2016 #65

Apparently, the penalty is to be nominated as the Democratic Party candidate demwing Apr 2016 #70

Contempt of court. ieoeja Apr 2016 #72