Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
. firebrand80 Apr 2016 #1
You still can't distinguish mathematically possibility from political possibility? morningfog Apr 2016 #2
2008 primary: Hillary continued "running" well after actual mathematical impossiblity. merrily Apr 2016 #11
Her surrogates pulled the J. Wright gambit in the last significant primaries. joshcryer Apr 2016 #29
Yes, but she cut a deal with him, although she is now denying that. "It was in all the papers" merrily Apr 2016 #40
Obama held all the cards. joshcryer Apr 2016 #45
Of course she had a deal to cut in 2008. PUMAs. Party Unity, she and Bill campaigning for Obama, no merrily Apr 2016 #48
No, I had you on ignore. joshcryer Apr 2016 #49
right kgnu_fan Apr 2016 #39
Thought it was Steven MadBadger Apr 2016 #3
Winning the Powerball lottery is possible too.... beachbum bob Apr 2016 #4
Ben Spielberg,whoever that is. nt sufrommich Apr 2016 #5
Right? ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #6
Demoralized voters won't show up in November lagomorph777 Apr 2016 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #25
They'll get interested again treestar Apr 2016 #32
We're looking forward to voting for Hillary here in California. grossproffit Apr 2016 #7
yay!!! kgnu_fan Apr 2016 #9
Proportional distribution of delegates means Sanders is no longer running to win the nomination. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #8
I don't think so, but I'd still like to see him kick serious butt. winter is coming Apr 2016 #10
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #12
You are correct LiveLong, unfortunately the Finger Men will see your post and FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #15
Thankfully, I don't have to write Hillary in. WOOHOO! grossproffit Apr 2016 #19
Are you also advocating that people vote for a 3rd Party?... SidDithers Apr 2016 #23
The op was "LiveLong" demwing Apr 2016 #46
The irony was not lost on me FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #47
If you believe that, you're a fool. NT Adrahil Apr 2016 #18
Bernie could win all the delegates in CA and still not catch up. Renew Deal Apr 2016 #13
Sooo... Adrahil Apr 2016 #16
No it is not possible. Sanders lost. seabeyond Apr 2016 #17
Really? workinclasszero Apr 2016 #20
About Ben Spielberg... SidDithers Apr 2016 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #26
Wait,you mean it's not Steven Spielberg???? sufrommich Apr 2016 #27
Ben is a good guy, his blog '34justice' is a good read. Not sure what your 'huh' is about... Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #30
My "Huh" is because the OP simply said "Spielberg"... SidDithers Apr 2016 #31
Never heard of him CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #33
I always like long shots, they pay off better. Waiting For Everyman Apr 2016 #22
By all means, take all of the money you can put your hands on to Vegas CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #34
I do very well at the track, thanks. Waiting For Everyman Apr 2016 #35
Then you had better stick with the ponies CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #38
I said, I don't need your adice, save it. Waiting For Everyman Apr 2016 #42
Is he using special effects? LOL Starry Messenger Apr 2016 #24
"thought you meant Stephen" sufrommich Apr 2016 #28
omg smh nlol... wtf uponit7771 Apr 2016 #36
By 40 points? Nope. Zynx Apr 2016 #37
Wasn't Spielberg the director of Close Encounters of the Third Party Kind? Karmadillo Apr 2016 #43
It is Ben Spielberg... so just get used to it kgnu_fan Apr 2016 #44
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Spielberg: Bernie needs t...»Reply #17