2016 Postmortem

ibegurpard

(17,081 posts)

27. Warren would sink her own credibility

Reply to mhatrw (Original post)

Fri Apr 29, 2016, 03:31 AM

Apr 2016

By running with Clinton.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The best case scenario for uniting the party would be Clinton/Warren ticket. [View all] mhatrw Apr 2016 OP

It will be Clinton/Warren. JaneyVee Apr 2016 #1

Highly doubtful. Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #20

And Hillary would never Duckhunter935 Apr 2016 #2

Great post! This is one of my favorite movies too! Califonz Apr 2016 #3

Hillary = Bernie Bros. nc4bo Apr 2016 #4

+9 million. silvershadow Apr 2016 #30

Exactly! We need Carolina Apr 2016 #47

Warren wouldn't go for that. onecaliberal Apr 2016 #5

No it wouldn't. SheilaT Apr 2016 #6

No, it would not make a difference. djean111 Apr 2016 #7

I do not think all objections to Hillary are sexist, but many are. nt Jitter65 Apr 2016 #11

You really have no clue. n/t winter is coming Apr 2016 #8

Warren will not be assimilated into the Clinton/DNC borg. n/t tabasco Apr 2016 #9

Terrible idea... brooklynite Apr 2016 #10

How do you know she doesn't want the job? (n/t) thesquanderer Apr 2016 #12

I seriously doubt she does. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #24

The fact that she did not want to run in the primary against Hillary... thesquanderer Apr 2016 #42

Proof, no. But I think it's a strong indication. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #45

No it wouldn't. Hillary will still be Hillary no matter her running mate... SMC22307 Apr 2016 #13

No Senator as VP! No Senators in the Cabinet! We need as many Dems Senators as possible. Liberalator Apr 2016 #14

How many sexist Bernie Bros that would salvage for Hillary? Then they wouldn't be sexist.... hellofromreddit Apr 2016 #15

Why Warren would be a horrible VP for Progressives demwing Apr 2016 #16

It's Castro..it was decided long ago... tokenlib Apr 2016 #17

Julian Castro or Thomas Perez are far more likely, I think. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #23

After the agism I've seen from her and her supporters I would be pressed to feel for her. Unicorn Apr 2016 #28

That would only diminish Warren (nt) Ino Apr 2016 #18

+1 Unicorn Apr 2016 #26

Yep pengu Apr 2016 #36

It'll probably be Debbie Wasserman Schultz Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #19

And we would be the losers loyalsister Apr 2016 #21

This wide-brush bullshit irks me. I'm a Bernie supporter/voter because I am more aligned Grown2Hate Apr 2016 #22

Let's hope Warren wouldn't be on ANY Clinton ticket. Supporting a corporatist warhawk is a BAD thing Unicorn Apr 2016 #25

Warren would sink her own credibility ibegurpard Apr 2016 #27

Precisely. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #44

That segment would be the first throwing Warren under the bus, since that's pretty much synergie Apr 2016 #29

Warren had issues with Hillary too. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #31

Totally clueless post. Neither one would go for that, nor would any true Bernie supporter. Live and Learn Apr 2016 #32

Clinton / Perez BET ON IT! Firebrand Gary Apr 2016 #33

Knowing Hillary she would be more likely to select Debbie Wasserman Schultz. B Calm Apr 2016 #34

How would taking Warren out of the senate and putting her in a powerless role unite us? pengu Apr 2016 #35

As VP, Warren would have a chance to influence Eric J in MN Apr 2016 #38

lol pengu Apr 2016 #40

Elizabeth Warren is my first choice for VP Eric J in MN Apr 2016 #37

No, thanks. I'd rather Warren stay in the Senate. (nt) bigwillq Apr 2016 #39

No. nt msanthrope Apr 2016 #41

In any other election cycle I'd say it's a bad idea Tarc Apr 2016 #43

I love Warren far too much to want her nerfed by the vice presidency. Orsino Apr 2016 #46

That would cause me to lose all respect for Warren. Urchin Apr 2016 #48