Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: This is NOT an election about moving right, left, or to the middle. [View all]ljm2002
(10,751 posts)10. Nonsense.
There is a huge amount of factual information that backs up the use of the term "oligarchy" to describe our present government and the graft that is involved.
During the so-called recovery, 95% of the monetary gains went to the top 1%. 95-fucking-percent. Top 1%. The reality could not be starker.
http://www.businessinsider.com/95-of-income-gains-since-2009-went-to-the-top-1-heres-what-that-really-means-2013-9
95% Of Income Gains Since 2009 Went To The Top 1% Here's What That Really Means
This month, Berkeley economics professor Emmanuel Saez put out an update to his estimates of income inequality, and the headline figure has everybody outraged: 95% of income gains since 2009 have accrued to the top 1%.
(of course I do not agree with the policy prescriptions contained in the article, but I wanted to use this source as it is not any ultra-liberal or leftist source, and yet they acknowledge the facts about income gains in the recovery)
We had a political scientist last year (I think at MIT) who showed that policy decisions of the government always go the way the elites want, and simply do not track with what the majority of the population wants. At all. Ah, here is another article from businessinsider:
http://www.businessinsider.com/major-study-finds-that-the-us-is-an-oligarchy-2014-4
Major Study Finds The US Is An Oligarchy
The U.S. government does not represent the interests of the majority of the country's citizens, but is instead ruled by those of the rich and powerful, a new study from Princeton and Northwestern universities has concluded.
Both of those facts together DEFINE the term "oligarchy". You cannot just wave your hands and dismiss these facts. You are, as they say, entitled to your own opinion; you are not entitled to your own facts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hate to differ. The primary has totally been about social issues. Not economy. Not war.
highprincipleswork
Apr 2016
#2
Yeah, those folks risking arrest protesting Trump, who cares about their SOCIAL issues
Jackie Wilson Said
Apr 2016
#3
Beyond the wordplay, I confess that my post wasn't the clearest. Perhaps it was the drugs kicking in
highprincipleswork
Apr 2016
#53
He probably won't be the nominee....But that does not mean he or his message are irrelevant
Armstead
Apr 2016
#29
Or indeed the huge numbers who wanted to vote for him, but were prevented by primary rules.
Kentonio
Apr 2016
#31
Sure. Can you win a primary first before you take a wrecking ball to the party?
BootinUp
Apr 2016
#12
Her entire time in the safe Senate seat she was parachuted into was a carefully orchestrated plan
Kentonio
Apr 2016
#34
Your amorphous soundbites will have the same effect as OWS: a brief flare and then darkness.
randome
Apr 2016
#35