2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Heads Up: Beware of any "Democrat" still supporting a corporate candidate [View all]R B Garr
(17,935 posts)after a year of attacking Clinton in his stump speech. Yet he sure does attack her about it. So the irony is that HE is the one making money from corporate/Wall Street influence by talking nonstop about it in his stump speech. He is making money from donations received from his attack . Yet he can't provide an example of the favor, so it's obviously bogus.
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/robert-schlesinger/articles/2016-04-14/bernie-sanders-whiffed-in-his-big-brooklyn-debate-moment-against-clinton
"But the most telling moment of the night came when CNN's Dana Bash drilled to the heart of Sanders' signature attack against Clinton. "Senator Sanders, you have consistently criticized Secretary Clinton for accepting money from Wall Street," she said. "Can you name one decision that she made as senator that shows that he favored banks because of the money she received?""