2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sanders Warns: Republicans Will Go After Hillary on Clinton Foundation [View all]emulatorloo
(44,408 posts)They are extremely partisan Republicans who have a long history of lying about Democrats. They have never been correct about anything in their lives.
Here's a link:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Victoria_Toensing
Republican partisan
"Toensing is, of course, not only a pricey DC defense lawyer. She's also a professional Republican, one tightly connected with the DC GOP power structure, and someone you could find at pretty much any point in the late nineties as an anti-Clinton 'legal expert' on every chat show under the sun," Joshua Micah Marshall wrote January 1, 2004, at Talking Points Memo.
"Joe DiGenova (as well as his wife and law partner Victoria Toensing) is a part of the DC Republican establishment who is routinely put forward when legal opinions are needed which exculpate Republicans or inculpate Democrats.
"There's no other way to put it. Look at their public statements in the various Clinton 'scandals', the Fitzgerald investigation and now this case. In their voluminous public pronouncements they are both, in the clearest sense of the word, advocates. And their 'client' is the Republican party establishment in Washington, DC. That's fine, as far as it goes. But they should be identified as such, albeit perhaps in gentler terms, when they provide quotes in papers like the [Washington] Times," Marshall wrote November 25, 2005, at Talking Points Memo.
---------------------------------------------------
Best way to approach DiGenova is to beleive the opposite of what he is saying. He isn't credible.
Edit history
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)