2016 Postmortem

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)

29. LOL! Trump's kids weren't registered. And hadn't been registered. Give it a rest.

Reply to pantsonfire (Original post)

Mon May 2, 2016, 03:28 PM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

“New York’s Primary may have been unconstitutional.” Even Trump's kids couldn't vote for him. [View all] pantsonfire May 2016 OP

Not registering is not being disenfranchised. It's being ignorant of your responsibilities. CrowCityDem May 2016 #1

While I would agree NWCorona May 2016 #5

There is a reason for the deadline. You may not agree with it but it's at least arguable. randome May 2016 #13

Primaries should be closed, but party declaration should be right up to the casting of a vote. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #39

So it's 3:30 in NY now. What was today's ruling? pnwmom May 2016 #2

Still waiting to hear the ruling....n/t pantsonfire May 2016 #11

The judge ruled against the Temporary Restraining Order more than an hour ago. pnwmom May 2016 #15

Added a photo of the ruling as an edit at the end of the OP...n/t pantsonfire May 2016 #21

I took extreme (guilty) pleasure in the fact that they couldn't vote for Trump nt NWCorona May 2016 #3

There is no right to vote in a party's primary. NobodyHere May 2016 #4

LOL, transparently carrying Trump's water. FSogol May 2016 #6

Voting for a party's nominee is not a right, so that first one is dead on arrival Tarc May 2016 #7

Because parties are private not public? n/t pantsonfire May 2016 #22

Trumps children who refused to register on time were irresponsible not disenfranchised. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #8

This is an incredibly stupid lawsuit KingFlorez May 2016 #9

What about the second lawsuit? n/t pantsonfire May 2016 #12

Why are you posting this without mentioning the judge denied the temporary restraining order pnwmom May 2016 #10

The "young" Turks aren't even pretending to have any journalistic integrity, are they? synergie May 2016 #18

At least they don't routinely factor in superdelegates in the "official" count... pantsonfire May 2016 #23

so you're saying they are slightly better than the rest of the Bernie media? synergie May 2016 #26

What's the Bernie Media? Who are these people? pantsonfire May 2016 #28

Neither do the pledged delegates mythology May 2016 #32

Um, none of this affects the outcome, or applies to Indies who didn't bother synergie May 2016 #14

I find it curious that you are not complaining about Caucasus. nt fun n serious May 2016 #16

They only complain about the caucuses Bernie didn't do as well in -- NV and Iowa. nt pnwmom May 2016 #19

Almost like they don't care about voter disenfranchisement when it's in favor of their synergie May 2016 #20

Their hypocrisy is disgusting. fun n serious May 2016 #25

NO no no....I tried to bring up voter suppression in other states... pantsonfire May 2016 #27

NY IS... fun n serious May 2016 #31

The lack of awareness of it is disturbing. Cognitive dissonance at play. synergie May 2016 #33

Yep. I say PULL the bargaining power away. fun n serious May 2016 #34

What would he even be bargaining for? Her policies are more progressive and synergie May 2016 #35

Whatever it is he thinks he has. fun n serious May 2016 #38

This is embarassing... brooklynite May 2016 #17

It's based on the NY Constitution and he is welcome... pantsonfire May 2016 #24

Actually the judge who rejected this is, and it's a FAIL. synergie May 2016 #36

LOL! Trump's kids weren't registered. And hadn't been registered. Give it a rest. Buzz Clik May 2016 #29

They were/are registered Democrats....n/t pantsonfire May 2016 #30

So you'll believe anything a Trump says? Figures. randome May 2016 #37