Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

griffi94

(3,733 posts)
132. More people like her is all
Mon May 2, 2016, 05:49 PM
May 2016

More people voted for her.
3 million more people.

300 delegate lead.
I don't think Bernie can close that big of a gap now.
He's too far behind.

300 delegates behind in fact and 3 million voters.

Any Democrat will win this year.
Bernie would have won the GE easily.
He just didn't seem to ever win over the majority of Democrats.

It's about creating a new right wing fake sufrommich May 2016 #1
Just as I suspected Fawke Em May 2016 #3
The FBI has to investigate the charge,no sufrommich May 2016 #6
See post #10. People have lost their^ for less..... Land of Enchantment May 2016 #13
No, they haven't. zipplewrath May 2016 #66
You ever had a Q Clearance? Land of Enchantment May 2016 #130
Yes I do zipplewrath May 2016 #143
This was started by Obama's State Department Ash_F May 2016 #25
Is there any real doubt that laws and policy were violated? TipTok May 2016 #37
Exactly zipplewrath May 2016 #67
If laws were violated... scscholar May 2016 #129
False on its face... TipTok May 2016 #133
Are you aware that DOJ told the FOIA court last week that a referral (case) is forthcoming JudyM May 2016 #182
It is serious but it's the DOJ that can prosecute and will they is the question because the FBI bkkyosemite May 2016 #102
what's as obvious as the nose on my face AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #47
It is impressive. deathrind May 2016 #84
Believe what you want. Reality has a way of rearing its ugly head when you least expect it. bjo59 May 2016 #51
You don't put out a fire... dchill May 2016 #107
Now *that has always been true. nt silvershadow May 2016 #152
If you have read up on the facts and still say this then your nose is surely a foot long, unless you JudyM May 2016 #181
Wave after wave of trouble is headed her way. yourpaljoey May 2016 #2
If she securs the Nom they will pull the trigger Ferd Berfel May 2016 #44
That's what I fear. bjo59 May 2016 #54
agree - I've said many times that they will wait until it's too late Ferd Berfel May 2016 #55
I honestly believe that as well. Puglover May 2016 #118
Her goose is cooked madokie May 2016 #128
I must admit, I am a little scared yourpaljoey May 2016 #136
No it didn't, but Clinton isn't in this for the good of the country is she?! haikugal May 2016 #151
She will ruin us all to get what she wants yourpaljoey May 2016 #168
WOW, you win the Spiro Agnew prize for alliteration tularetom May 2016 #4
My thought exactly! Loved it! lagomorph777 May 2016 #125
GMTA farleftlib May 2016 #186
Ill-informed desperate gibberish keeps on a'flowin from Camp Sanders Tarc May 2016 #5
Wrist slaps as a result of indictments/convictions. HooptieWagon May 2016 #7
Even indictment of staffers would be bad unc70 May 2016 #48
In the unlike chance that actually happened, it still won't put the Bern in the White House, bro Tarc May 2016 #52
No one can predict the resolution of chaos,... HooptieWagon May 2016 #99
You point to conspicuous weaknesses in our system as justification for perpetuating them RufusTFirefly May 2016 #8
Petraeus pled down from 793, a felony, to 1924, a misdemeanor. Berger also pled guilty to 1924. leveymg May 2016 #19
And don't forget this: Fawke Em May 2016 #28
Not just from Camp Sanders, as Bernie Sanders correctly dismissed it as crap The Second Stone May 2016 #50
Neither one of them that you mention were SOS head of handling all secrets for the security of bkkyosemite May 2016 #116
Since nothing was classified at the time, it hardly matters. Tarc May 2016 #120
Really? The State Department disagrees Bob41213 May 2016 #187
Yes, really, Mr. Cherry-Picker Tarc May 2016 #189
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #117
If you had an ounce of reading comprehension skills timmymoff May 2016 #166
The Indictment Fairy isn't going to deliver you the nomination, bro Tarc May 2016 #169
ain't seeking indictment nor someone to vote for president. timmymoff May 2016 #188
Don't lie and backpedall when caught, kiddo Tarc May 2016 #190
Show me once where I mentioned indictment timmymoff May 2016 #191
Kickin' with gusto! Faux pas May 2016 #9
People have lost their livelihoods and freedom for less.... Land of Enchantment May 2016 #10
Bull Hockey zipplewrath May 2016 #18
people knowingly and intentionally mishandled clasified information, despite knowing they should not pdsimdars May 2016 #93
No one has made that claim yet zipplewrath May 2016 #148
I believe the Justice Department has a better handle on these things than you do.[n/t] Maedhros May 2016 #113
How many indictments? zipplewrath May 2016 #147
The FBI is conducting an investigation - this is fact. Maedhros May 2016 #149
They conduct alot of investigtions zipplewrath May 2016 #150
I work with the FBI. They investigate cases I bring to them, sometimes. Maedhros May 2016 #158
You are grossly mistaken zipplewrath May 2016 #173
Indeed. The Clinton Machine... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #179
The Indictment Fairy laughs at this! NurseJackie May 2016 #11
Proving my point: You don't know jack about what you're talking about. Fawke Em May 2016 #30
That for which you wish will never happen. NurseJackie May 2016 #33
You're wrong zipplewrath May 2016 #12
I don't believe the defense of "I didn't know it was classified material" will wash. rhett o rick May 2016 #23
No one would be prosecuted zipplewrath May 2016 #59
Where I worked, if you mishandled classified material you'd lose your security clearance rhett o rick May 2016 #68
Intentionally zipplewrath May 2016 #72
What about if you intentionally, using a private server, converse with someone like polly7 May 2016 #73
Showing poor judgement zipplewrath May 2016 #75
He was being paid by her Foundation at the same time, right? polly7 May 2016 #77
Because it's not zipplewrath May 2016 #79
How could he have fired her if he didn't know about it? nt. polly7 May 2016 #97
That is a problem zipplewrath May 2016 #100
She exposed state secrets at the highest level, people's lives were in jeopardy because of what pdsimdars May 2016 #101
She did not zipplewrath May 2016 #103
Did she report Blumenthal as Sec 793 requires? No. leveymg May 2016 #165
And when was the last time someone was prosecuted? zipplewrath May 2016 #174
You don't know what you are saying. I'd suggest you talk to someone who is an intelligence pdsimdars May 2016 #95
If one handles classified materials they are trained to recognize it. "I didn't know it was rhett o rick May 2016 #121
It is not "acceptable" zipplewrath May 2016 #144
you know what it is *not a long way from, though? Dragging my good name silvershadow May 2016 #153
Been there, done that zipplewrath May 2016 #184
We do, all the time zipplewrath May 2016 #145
You are looking at your candidate's actions through rose colored glasses. Maedhros May 2016 #115
Here's some of the language of the statute that may have been violated: CentralCoaster May 2016 #91
You know what I admire about the Clinton's? FlatBaroque May 2016 #27
Waterboard a Word!!! Getting up off the floor... Land of Enchantment May 2016 #64
Her server wasn't approved for use. Fawke Em May 2016 #31
That's not the story being told zipplewrath May 2016 #57
Ask General Pitreas about that. pdsimdars May 2016 #104
He did it intentionally zipplewrath May 2016 #105
So did Clinton. She set up an unsecured private server and used it the entire time she was SOS. haikugal May 2016 #157
No zipplewrath May 2016 #172
The information was clearly marked and she told them to take the classification off and send to her haikugal May 2016 #178
Actually, what she said was zipplewrath May 2016 #183
Conviction under Sec. 793 requires neither intent nor actual harm. Mishandling is enough. leveymg May 2016 #42
Necessary, but not sufficient zipplewrath May 2016 #63
She did it despite and in spite of being told not to use her Blackberry. She's in serious trouble leveymg May 2016 #87
So far you have nothing zipplewrath May 2016 #98
There is no confusion about what is classified and not. That is a typical Clinton red herring pdsimdars May 2016 #106
Everything you have posted so far is misinformation or disinformation. leveymg May 2016 #111
Sorry, it doesn't work that way. zipplewrath May 2016 #146
Petraeus was allowed to plead down to a different charge, Sec. 1924. leveymg May 2016 #163
"Allowed" zipplewrath May 2016 #176
You're calling it a "mistake", whereas the evidence shows she set up her server as an end-run around leveymg May 2016 #185
That's a heck of a deduction on your part zipplewrath May 2016 #192
The intent is clearly on the face of the acts in evidence. leveymg May 2016 #193
Not to a prosecutor zipplewrath May 2016 #194
Under the Espionage Act, stupidity is a crime. One does not have to intend to harm the US or leveymg May 2016 #195
In a court of law zipplewrath May 2016 #196
I might agree, if she hadn't herself posted classified info or encouraged Blumenthal to do so. leveymg May 2016 #197
Intent zipplewrath May 2016 #198
Her use of a private server was supposedly "approved" for use. frylock May 2016 #76
Her testimony zipplewrath May 2016 #78
I hope the response satisfies your request Capt. Obvious May 2016 #85
Absolutely! frylock May 2016 #124
There is no link because that never happened. leveymg May 2016 #90
^^^^^^^^^^^ Amen! ^^^^^^^^^^^ pdsimdars May 2016 #108
So many, many, many good reasons to reject Hillary Clinton. Scuba May 2016 #14
Can you imagine how enthusiastically she will be supported? nt silvershadow May 2016 #154
Well, I do see the Republicans drooling at the chance to vote against her. Scuba May 2016 #156
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #15
good god...not this fucking shit again Sheepshank May 2016 #16
I see you also know little about cyber security. Fawke Em May 2016 #32
Naw, just living in the Clinton Bubble. She who can do no wrong. libdem4life May 2016 #41
Reccing for the alliteration alone. NV Whino May 2016 #17
Where is the alliteration? DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #20
Cute.😏 NV Whino May 2016 #86
Thanks, been trying to put that together myself nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #21
I'm now in the middle of reading the medium version timeline and this is worth bookmarking. Uncle Joe May 2016 #22
It just remind me of the tea baggers and climate change denial. . . . the refuse to accept facts. pdsimdars May 2016 #24
GOP central Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #26
The dude who wrong the definitive guide to the 9/11 timeline... Fawke Em May 2016 #35
Endless attacks of HIllary is GOP central. You may not even know you are doing it. Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #36
Poor Hillary. frylock May 2016 #81
Recommend.... KoKo May 2016 #171
I realize Bernies supporters wish this would turn into something. griffi94 May 2016 #29
What Bernie supporters do not want is Clinton elected to a term of eternal impeachment proceedings. peace13 May 2016 #34
And yet FAR better than ANY con, right? Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #39
It is senseless to vote for someone with these problems. peace13 May 2016 #49
I thought the last Clinton administration was a success griffi94 May 2016 #43
A success? For who? Apparently you did not live through that era, I did. Land of Enchantment May 2016 #58
I'm 53 griffi94 May 2016 #62
that's bullshit jcgoldie May 2016 #70
DOMA, DADT, NAFTA zipplewrath May 2016 #74
"failed economic policies" jcgoldie May 2016 #80
Hellloooooo... Land of Enchantment May 2016 #88
The instablity was clearly there prior however zipplewrath May 2016 #89
What you don't seem to understand is that investigations aren't like they are on TV. Fawke Em May 2016 #38
What you don't seem to understand griffi94 May 2016 #46
The overwhelming majority of Democratic voters are going to be in for quite a shock.. frylock May 2016 #82
That's not going to happen griffi94 May 2016 #83
LOL, now THAT is funny! Land of Enchantment May 2016 #96
Hillary is leading Bernie griffi94 May 2016 #109
Yep. frylock May 2016 #123
And yet she's blowing everybody else away griffi94 May 2016 #127
Can't imagine how the former First Lady who has the entire Party structure backing her.. frylock May 2016 #131
More people like her is all griffi94 May 2016 #132
Yeah, that must be it. frylock May 2016 #137
I really don't see a mystery griffi94 May 2016 #138
Good thing only Democrats get to vote in the GE. frylock May 2016 #139
That's not true griffi94 May 2016 #140
maybe the "powers that be" don't want Bernie. virtualobserver May 2016 #40
I have also thought this. pdsimdars May 2016 #110
In the Land of Enchantment where facts become attacks. LOL. n/t libdem4life May 2016 #45
Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi whitewater whitewater whitewater beachbumbob May 2016 #53
Hillary's Comment - "You Mean With a Cloth?" gordyfl May 2016 #56
And I saw a couple of people report that at the time she was reading a book about how to pdsimdars May 2016 #112
Oh it's real enough. They've used this trick to knock out a few small fry. ucrdem May 2016 #60
Any second now!!!!!!!!!!!! JoePhilly May 2016 #61
Frog marched zipplewrath May 2016 #65
I think we have a bit more waiting to do actually nt NWCorona May 2016 #94
Of course it is real. The Fox News spin, not so much. emulatorloo May 2016 #69
Hillary Supporter thinks Paul is a Freeper looking only to sell books. frylock May 2016 #71
Trashed Bayard May 2016 #92
As soon as the FBI makes an annuoncement about it, the feeding frenzy will begin pdsimdars May 2016 #114
Nor is it a secret for our primary voters. n/t pampango May 2016 #119
The new version of the truthers Progressive dog May 2016 #122
Denial will work fine until the FBI reports. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #126
No Demsrule86 May 2016 #135
So we post the entire Thompson piece ...a Bernie supporters opinion Demsrule86 May 2016 #134
Remember that FBI lawsuit against Apple? The one that crashed and burned? ucrdem May 2016 #141
Absolutely true Demsrule86 May 2016 #170
Nu uh. seabeyond May 2016 #142
Old liberal that I am Whimsey May 2016 #155
Oh, look, another one. Maedhros May 2016 #159
Really? Whimsey May 2016 #161
It wasn't the same they used email she used a private server..completely different. I think they haikugal May 2016 #160
You are wrong. Whimsey May 2016 #162
I not using a keyboard so I shorten things for my own comfort...it's really none of your business. haikugal May 2016 #164
BS Whimsey May 2016 #167
Lol 33 posts. Guys I think they are correcting the record over here. DFab420 May 2016 #177
What Rice and Powell did 2cannan May 2016 #180
Yawn. Scurrilous May 2016 #175
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The investigation into Cl...»Reply #132