Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
10. The judge gets it exactly right
Mon May 2, 2016, 05:00 PM
May 2016

A very concise explanation of the reason for closed primaries:

“The court is concerned that a ruling in (Moody's) favor will denigrate the associational rights of the political parties and their members and may lead to 'party raiding' whereby voters not aligned with a particular party or its philosophy or goals will vote for the weaker or weakest candidate ... to prevail in the general election,” the judge wrote.


Too bad the "independents" can't be bothered to learn their state's election rules. Too bad the Sanders campaign didn't train staff and volunteers to educate their supporters. But of course, it's fraud!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's out of a court's jurisdiction to decide what kind of primary a political party can have. Trust Buster May 2016 #1
Per SCOTUS DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #3
Facts are very establishment, thus certain factions must reject them. synergie May 2016 #8
lol nt brer cat May 2016 #19
One more "last hope for Bernie", down in flames. nt COLGATE4 May 2016 #2
As it should be. JaneyVee May 2016 #4
Good! hrmjustin May 2016 #5
Next time indies, get off your asses and register! leftofcool May 2016 #6
But then they'd have nothing to bitch about. grossproffit May 2016 #9
Maybe Bernie should support a bill granting political party immunity. CrowCityDem May 2016 #7
The judge gets it exactly right NastyRiffraff May 2016 #10
WELL! Didn't see THAT coming... brooklynite May 2016 #11
The merits on this ruling are perfect. This is settled law, political parties can determine their IamMab May 2016 #12
The lawsuit was frivolous to say the least, imo... Spazito May 2016 #13
So the plaintiff pretty much stated his ignorance from the outset? wysi May 2016 #14
Good. murielm99 May 2016 #15
And no more stupid Caucuses!!!! Walk away May 2016 #22
This is the correct ruling Gothmog May 2016 #16
Good ruling! DesertRat May 2016 #17
Too bad, so sad... MoonRiver May 2016 #18
Good ruling. brer cat May 2016 #20
So many desperate law suits and pathetic accusations! Walk away May 2016 #21
K&R. nt UtahLib May 2016 #23
K&R Jamaal510 May 2016 #24
Mahalo, synergie! Cha May 2016 #25
Hey cha! synergie May 2016 #27
At the very least, they need to drop the deadline over 6 months before to switch parties jfern May 2016 #26
Surprise surprise Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2016 #28
I hope the Supreme court takes it up... northernsouthern May 2016 #29
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Judge Rejects Challenge t...»Reply #10