I have two questions about the email controversy

[paulthompson]

88. "truther"

I am annoyed at labels like that. I think the fact that my book was used in a Harvard class taught by Richard Clarke, counterterrorism tsar at the time of 9/11 and under Bill Clinton too, speaks for itself. There are a lot of unanswered questions about 9/11 that are still unanswered. Look at how the "28 pages" about possible Saudi involvement in the attack are about to be finally released in the next few weeks as just one example. I think it's sad that people like me who wanted to find out the truth about what happened with such a pivotal event are derided.

Anyway, I'm glad that you at least seem open to having a rational discussion instead of mocking people like me as "dreaming of the indictment fairy" or the like. I hope more Clinton supporters will be open to discussion about this topic.

I'm trying to promote the idea that we need to see what the real facts of this scandal are and deal with them instead of burying our heads in the sand and pretending the scandal doesn't exist. That latter approach will guarantee that Democrats will be blindsided by Trump regarding this if Clinton and Trump face off in the general election.