Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
7. Didn't come from the campaign. Does nobody here know how to look for the source?
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:57 PM
May 2016

It's easy. If you can't figure it out, ask your grandchildren.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why is there a sanders website on that? He hasn't endorsed him. onehandle May 2016 #1
they seem to be faking lots of endorsements, never seen a campaign do this..... bettyellen May 2016 #2
Didn't come from the campaign. Does nobody here know how to look for the source? Luminous Animal May 2016 #7
WOW- what nasty ageist bullshit. LOL @ the pope Why are SBS people spreading these deceptive pics? bettyellen May 2016 #8
No SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sheshe2 May 2016 #13
Some people marinate in such bitterness..... gotta suck being them. bettyellen May 2016 #15
This is pretty fucking rich. frylock May 2016 #52
what- the nasty ageist reply to questions about where the images are coming from? bettyellen May 2016 #56
Your team has been bagging on millennials since jump. frylock May 2016 #57
I don't have a team. Good luck with the nasty people you have aligned yourself with. bettyellen May 2016 #58
Again, fucking rich. frylock May 2016 #60
SBS would pull down the blinds and refuse to talk to world leaders I guess. LOL. bettyellen May 2016 #61
Blankfein and Kissinger are "world leaders"? frylock May 2016 #62
THEN WHY IS BS NAME ON THAT IMAGE! sheshe2 May 2016 #17
Anybody can attach anything to an image. Have you seen the weird things that have been Luminous Animal May 2016 #20
It is beneath me LA? Thanks so much for the insult. sheshe2 May 2016 #25
You are accusing the Bernie campaign of falsifying with zero evidence. That is beneath you. Luminous Animal May 2016 #28
After trying to get a photo-op with the pope, nothing would shock me, LOL. bettyellen May 2016 #30
So how about addressing the meat of the Carter quote instead of getting all fucking indignant dinkytron May 2016 #37
how about telling someone else what to discuss, LOL. you ain't the boss of me- but perhaps others bettyellen May 2016 #38
I don't give a shit where it came from. sheshe2 May 2016 #32
Don't worry nothing is beneath you. Katashi_itto May 2016 #47
So you have Clinton's endorsement Goblinmonger May 2016 #43
here: G_j May 2016 #64
Like this one? No deception here... grossproffit May 2016 #9
It is called a quote..When Bernie quotes FDR, do you imagine that Bernie is implying that FDR rose.. virtualobserver May 2016 #10
it's called trying to have pope magic rub off on you- and failing, LOL. bettyellen May 2016 #12
That had to be my favorite fail of this year. nt nolawarlock May 2016 #29
Bernie is endorsing the quote.....the only thing fake is your outrage. virtualobserver May 2016 #11
It is amazing... deathrind May 2016 #21
It is not a fake endorsement at all. You obviously are misguided. nt Live and Learn May 2016 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author sheshe2 May 2016 #33
Deflect! Deflect! hellofromreddit May 2016 #3
Three minutes to respond. You are slipping. Your post is not worth responding to. rhett o rick May 2016 #4
Which begs the question, why respond? moriah May 2016 #34
It doesn't come form the campaign. So there you go. Luminous Animal May 2016 #6
Interesting takeaway. frylock May 2016 #51
He's absolutely right. TDale313 May 2016 #5
FWIW, he was referring specifically to NSA survelliance. Garrett78 May 2016 #14
Oh, come on now all of you. sadoldgirl May 2016 #16
Dems version of GW Bush; pious and incompetent ericson00 May 2016 #18
Rather than bash (or praise) Carter, folks should consider the context. Garrett78 May 2016 #35
A state of affairs, I would add, Hillary supports and voted for. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #36
Unfortunately, Carter also indicated that he thought Snowden should be prosecuted. Garrett78 May 2016 #39
I am conflicted about whether Snowden should be prosecuted. Understandable that Carter is as well JonLeibowitz May 2016 #40
carter has also said that us elections do no meet the minimum standards questionseverything May 2016 #44
I certainly agree with him, but the quote in the OP was specifically about NSA surveillance. Garrett78 May 2016 #45
Dems version of GW Bush. frylock May 2016 #53
Jimmeh! AzDar May 2016 #19
I agree, and no functioning legitimate elections either nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #22
This primary ripped the mask off the entire system...having nothing to do with the issues silvershadow May 2016 #23
Indeed it has nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #24
Yes it is. I cannot unknown it either so that's not happening. silvershadow May 2016 #26
As has been demonstrated numerous times during this primary. nt haikugal May 2016 #54
Quick! Everyone scrub your feeds, walls, profiles, blogs, websites, siggies, Kittycat May 2016 #31
I guess... tk2kewl May 2016 #41
Politics has just become nothing more than a stage play. VulgarPoet May 2016 #42
A wise man speaking the truth. tabasco May 2016 #46
And so the saga continues! Sancho May 2016 #48
This is really all that Sanders and his supporters amount to; bumper-sticker rhetoric Tarc May 2016 #49
I think some actually believe dank memes= votes. bettyellen May 2016 #59
Those words on a poster with a bottom line referring to the jwirr May 2016 #50
No, it isn't. "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" is false advertising. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author MineralMan May 2016 #63
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This is an actual, verifi...»Reply #7