Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

paulthompson

(2,398 posts)
29. That is true
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:36 AM
May 2016

Here's a couple of timeline entries about that:

March 2007 - 2008: The Bush Administration gets embroiled in a private email scandal. A Congressional oversight committee investigates allegations that the White House fired US attorneys for political reasons. The committee asks Bush officials to turn over relevant emails, only to find that government work had been conducted on private email addresses. Millions of emails are deleted and permanently lost, preventing the committee from continuing their investigation. Bush officials use email accounts associated with a private gwb43.com server owned and controlled by the Republican National Committee, which is a private political entity not covered by government oversight laws. (The Washington Post, 3/27/2007) (Vox, 3/2/2015) In 2015, shortly after Clinton's use of a private email address will be revealed, Vox will comment, "That [Bush administration email] scandal unfolded well into the final year of Bush's presidency, then overlapped with another email secrecy scandal, over official emails that got improperly logged and then deleted, which itself dragged well into Obama's first year in office. There is simply no way that, when Clinton decided to use her personal email address as secretary of state, she was unaware of the national scandal that Bush officials had created by doing the same." Vox will also note, "Perhaps even more stunning is that the Obama White House, whose top officials were presumably exchanging frequent emails with Clinton, apparently did not insist she adopt an official email account." (Vox, 3/2/2015)


June 20, 2007: Clinton publicly criticizes the Bush administration's use of non-governmental email accounts: While campaigning for president, Clinton says, "Our Constitution is being shredded. We know about the secret wiretaps. We know about secret military tribunals, the secret White House email accounts. ... It's a stunning record of secrecy and corruption, of cronyism run amok." (ABC News, 3/6/2015) (The Hill, 3/5/2015) This is a reference to a scandal that became public earlier in the month, where it was found that White House adviser Karl Rove and other officials had used private email accounts and then deleted all their emails before investigators could get them. (Vox, 3/2/2015)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

so you are placing your trust in Obama.. grasswire May 2016 #1
I want to understand too. Can I wait here with you ? agracie May 2016 #2
:-) nt grasswire May 2016 #23
I'm saying, they would have already indicted if they knew.... moriah May 2016 #3
The FBI hasn't finished their investigation yet, and only the AG can indict riderinthestorm May 2016 #6
I have a lot of criticisms TM99 May 2016 #18
totally agree on all these points you make here... 2banon May 2016 #20
Carter and Obama are good men TM99 May 2016 #22
Look at her disrespect of him!! grasswire May 2016 #24
She will never be forgiven for disprecting Obama and putting his legacy at risk. 2banon May 2016 #35
and yet she has the chutzpah to holler this: grasswire May 2016 #37
Incredibly true! TM99 May 2016 #45
I don't have expectations she will be held to account vis a vis indictments etc 2banon May 2016 #34
"I cannot for the life of me figure out why the party establishment didn't insist she stand down" hootinholler May 2016 #38
Yeah.. good point 2banon May 2016 #40
With the current FBI head TM99 May 2016 #46
from your lips to someones ears. 2banon May 2016 #49
Sometimes all I feel I have left TM99 May 2016 #50
I'm with you! Count me in on this long hard fought struggle 2banon May 2016 #51
My first election was 1988. TM99 May 2016 #52
Yes. And all the non-partisan, non-book selling legal analysts who have explained pnwmom May 2016 #15
I wasn't asking you. The question was for the author. nt grasswire May 2016 #25
Question - ebayfool May 2016 #4
The recently discussed article, by Paul Thompson... moriah May 2016 #5
Your link doesn't indicate that Bushco set up their own private server riderinthestorm May 2016 #7
BushCo. ran a lot of emails through the Republican party server. pnwmom May 2016 #17
Thank you for your memory. :) moriah May 2016 #19
In the case of the Bush server scandal TM99 May 2016 #8
Again... if this was so unprecedented, you surely understand why my first concern... moriah May 2016 #13
She does not need special knowledge TM99 May 2016 #16
HRC's agreement with Obama allowed her unusual ability to bring in many people karynnj May 2016 #39
yes, SD business was conducted on the server... grasswire May 2016 #26
And that alone is a violation to the agreement Hillary signed nt NWCorona May 2016 #36
All three are incredibly damning TM99 May 2016 #42
I see nothing of that. Even did a word search. Can you do a copy-paste? ebayfool May 2016 #10
Here is what I was referring to: moriah May 2016 #14
TY, I see it now. But that's apples to oranges. ebayfool May 2016 #21
That is true paulthompson May 2016 #29
Let's not forget that TM99 May 2016 #9
Yup. He was HER go-to-IT-guy! ebayfool May 2016 #11
Exactly! TM99 May 2016 #12
Well, it is not necessary to prove intent in mishandling classified documents. grasswire May 2016 #27
Yes, absolutely correct here TM99 May 2016 #41
Some on the right... grasswire May 2016 #53
Nah, more likely she was TM99 May 2016 #55
Thanks paulthompson May 2016 #28
One really wonders why they gave him immunity Bob41213 May 2016 #43
"IT security trumps even supervisors, even Secretaries of State. " ucrdem May 2016 #30
reply paulthompson May 2016 #31
Interfering in election seems a fine reason for Barack to ask for his resignation. ucrdem May 2016 #32
He? paulthompson May 2016 #44
He'll do as much as thinks he can get away with. He's already done plenty. ucrdem May 2016 #47
Comey paulthompson May 2016 #48
OpenSecrets.Org: "Comey's Conservative Chops" ucrdem May 2016 #54
GOOGLE Frank Giustra... Octafish May 2016 #33
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»An honest criticism of Pa...»Reply #29