Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BootinUp

(47,148 posts)
Tue May 3, 2016, 04:54 PM May 2016

This may shock you: Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest | Jill Abramson - The Guardian [View all]

I’ve investigated Hillary and know she likes a ‘zone of privacy’ around her. This lack of transparency, rather than any actual corruption, is her greatest flaw


It’s impossible to miss the “Hillary for Prison” signs at Trump rallies. At one of the Democratic debates, the moderator asked Hillary Clinton whether she would drop out of the race if she were indicted over her private email server. “Oh for goodness – that is not going to happen,” she said. “I’m not even going to answer that question.”

Based on what I know about the emails, the idea of her being indicted or going to prison is nonsensical. Nonetheless, the belief that Clinton is dishonest and untrustworthy is pervasive. A recent New York Times-CBS poll found that 40% of Democrats say she cannot be trusted.

For decades she’s been portrayed as a Lady Macbeth involved in nefarious plots, branded as “a congenital liar” and accused of covering up her husband’s misconduct, from Arkansas to Monica Lewinsky. Some of this is sexist caricature. Some is stoked by the “Hillary is a liar” videos that flood Facebook feeds. Some of it she brings on herself by insisting on a perimeter or “zone of privacy” that she protects too fiercely. It’s a natural impulse, given the level of scrutiny she’s attracted, more than any male politician I can think of.

I would be “dead rich”, to adapt an infamous Clinton phrase, if I could bill for all the hours I’ve spent covering just about every “scandal” that has enveloped the Clintons. As an editor I’ve launched investigations into her business dealings, her fundraising, her foundation and her marriage. As a reporter my stories stretch back to Whitewater. I’m not a favorite in Hillaryland. That makes what I want to say next surprising.

Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest and trustworthy. (continued at the link below)

...Link to the fulll article at The Guardian


33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This won't shock you: This article is fundamentally bullshit. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #1
Someone close to us became personally acquainted with Hillary Hortensis May 2016 #16
Also fundamentally rehashed. Posted here... dchill May 2016 #27
And much more. 840high May 2016 #30
Depends on what your deffinition of the word 'is' is Ferd Berfel May 2016 #2
Great read, thank you for posting. Firebrand Gary May 2016 #3
"Fundamentally Honest"... deathrind May 2016 #4
That word is a perfect hedge, really. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #21
Depends of what the definition of fundamental is. Eom. Rebkeh May 2016 #5
Yes, that 'zone of privacy' TM99 May 2016 #6
The Bullshit Meter went off at ... ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #7
Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest, in the same way.... 99Forever May 2016 #8
LOL farleftlib May 2016 #14
Except when her misstatements are taken out of context. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #9
Cite the case. BootinUp May 2016 #11
. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #12
Then please get your facts straight on what happened. Because you are way off on that one. nt BootinUp May 2016 #13
Really? Pretty weak. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #18
First off both cases she was telling the same story, and her policy has not changed BootinUp May 2016 #19
Which is it? A misstatement, an out of context quote or that's her story and she's sticking with it? lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #33
Hahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahah LOL hahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahhaha insta8er May 2016 #10
Not a shock to me, but I do my homework! Lucinda May 2016 #15
If her lips are moving farleftlib May 2016 #17
The article comes off a little like damning with faint praise. Buns_of_Fire May 2016 #20
"But he's _fundamentally_ a good kid." Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #22
Shock? No, the media has been trying to gaslight reality itself for over a decade. Shandris May 2016 #23
The former editor of The New York Times will write anything to stay relevant. Octafish May 2016 #24
She's also fundamentally brave, having dodged sniper fire in Bosnia Doctor_J May 2016 #25
She's fundamentally "honest" in precisely the same way that a lawyer is "honest". w4rma May 2016 #26
K&R mcar May 2016 #28
The question here seems to be is Jill Abramson honest? bjo59 May 2016 #29
The truth is that there is no credible evidence supporting the BootinUp May 2016 #31
But then, if you enter the world of FACTS . . . . provably not so much. . . pdsimdars May 2016 #32
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This may shock you: Hilla...»Reply #0