Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
45. Incredibly true!
Tue May 3, 2016, 05:57 PM
May 2016

She is a narcissist. She only gives a shit about her and those she considers to be objects of convenience as long as you are useful. After that, to fuck with you, I am doing what I want.

Yes, she has. I just hope Obama remains the honorable man and does nothing to screw with this just to protect now his reputation and legacy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

so you are placing your trust in Obama.. grasswire May 2016 #1
I want to understand too. Can I wait here with you ? agracie May 2016 #2
:-) nt grasswire May 2016 #23
I'm saying, they would have already indicted if they knew.... moriah May 2016 #3
The FBI hasn't finished their investigation yet, and only the AG can indict riderinthestorm May 2016 #6
I have a lot of criticisms TM99 May 2016 #18
totally agree on all these points you make here... 2banon May 2016 #20
Carter and Obama are good men TM99 May 2016 #22
Look at her disrespect of him!! grasswire May 2016 #24
She will never be forgiven for disprecting Obama and putting his legacy at risk. 2banon May 2016 #35
and yet she has the chutzpah to holler this: grasswire May 2016 #37
Incredibly true! TM99 May 2016 #45
I don't have expectations she will be held to account vis a vis indictments etc 2banon May 2016 #34
"I cannot for the life of me figure out why the party establishment didn't insist she stand down" hootinholler May 2016 #38
Yeah.. good point 2banon May 2016 #40
With the current FBI head TM99 May 2016 #46
from your lips to someones ears. 2banon May 2016 #49
Sometimes all I feel I have left TM99 May 2016 #50
I'm with you! Count me in on this long hard fought struggle 2banon May 2016 #51
My first election was 1988. TM99 May 2016 #52
Yes. And all the non-partisan, non-book selling legal analysts who have explained pnwmom May 2016 #15
I wasn't asking you. The question was for the author. nt grasswire May 2016 #25
Question - ebayfool May 2016 #4
The recently discussed article, by Paul Thompson... moriah May 2016 #5
Your link doesn't indicate that Bushco set up their own private server riderinthestorm May 2016 #7
BushCo. ran a lot of emails through the Republican party server. pnwmom May 2016 #17
Thank you for your memory. :) moriah May 2016 #19
In the case of the Bush server scandal TM99 May 2016 #8
Again... if this was so unprecedented, you surely understand why my first concern... moriah May 2016 #13
She does not need special knowledge TM99 May 2016 #16
HRC's agreement with Obama allowed her unusual ability to bring in many people karynnj May 2016 #39
yes, SD business was conducted on the server... grasswire May 2016 #26
And that alone is a violation to the agreement Hillary signed nt NWCorona May 2016 #36
All three are incredibly damning TM99 May 2016 #42
I see nothing of that. Even did a word search. Can you do a copy-paste? ebayfool May 2016 #10
Here is what I was referring to: moriah May 2016 #14
TY, I see it now. But that's apples to oranges. ebayfool May 2016 #21
That is true paulthompson May 2016 #29
Let's not forget that TM99 May 2016 #9
Yup. He was HER go-to-IT-guy! ebayfool May 2016 #11
Exactly! TM99 May 2016 #12
Well, it is not necessary to prove intent in mishandling classified documents. grasswire May 2016 #27
Yes, absolutely correct here TM99 May 2016 #41
Some on the right... grasswire May 2016 #53
Nah, more likely she was TM99 May 2016 #55
Thanks paulthompson May 2016 #28
One really wonders why they gave him immunity Bob41213 May 2016 #43
"IT security trumps even supervisors, even Secretaries of State. " ucrdem May 2016 #30
reply paulthompson May 2016 #31
Interfering in election seems a fine reason for Barack to ask for his resignation. ucrdem May 2016 #32
He? paulthompson May 2016 #44
He'll do as much as thinks he can get away with. He's already done plenty. ucrdem May 2016 #47
Comey paulthompson May 2016 #48
OpenSecrets.Org: "Comey's Conservative Chops" ucrdem May 2016 #54
GOOGLE Frank Giustra... Octafish May 2016 #33
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»An honest criticism of Pa...»Reply #45