Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(38,437 posts)

5. It's actually a roll of toilet paper and a sharpie, but "spreadsheet" sounds more intellectual.

Tue May 3, 2016, 07:53 PM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Curious... on my spreadsheet, I gave IN to Sanders 53/47. [View all] Buzz Clik May 2016 OP

You have a "spreadsheet"? CoffeeCat May 2016 #1

You got that right CoffeeCat May 2016 #18

What's meaningless about a win for Bernie? n/t CaliforniaPeggy May 2016 #2

My prediction is meaningless. Buzz Clik May 2016 #6

Oh, OK. Thanks for clarifying. CaliforniaPeggy May 2016 #13

But, you are currently correct, unfortunately. MoonRiver May 2016 #3

Yes, indeed. Buzz Clik May 2016 #7

He might get it by 7 ismnotwasm May 2016 #4

Hope springs eternal... Buzz Clik May 2016 #11

It's not meaningless. That the presumptive nominee cali May 2016 #8

No, it doesn't. ismnotwasm May 2016 #10

No it doesn't. She didn't run any ads there. KittyWampus May 2016 #12

Volumes of what, exactly? Buzz Clik May 2016 #14

Why are some votes meaningless while others aren't? NWCorona May 2016 #9

My prediction is meaningless, not IN, not the result. Buzz Clik May 2016 #15

Got it! 😀 NWCorona May 2016 #16