2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The Indiana result represents a continuation of the pattern. [View all]RichVRichV
(885 posts)Keep trying to diminish open primaries like they're meaningless, but all they're doing is proving how poor of a general election candidate Hillary is. If you can't win the Independent vote in the swing states you can't win the presidency.
Independent votes in swing state primaries:
Indiana - Bernie: 70%, Hillary: 30% (Trump got ~247% more Independent votes than Hillary!)
Florida - Bernie: 55%, Hillary: 44% (Trump got ~68% more Independent votes than Hillary)
Ohio - Bernie: 66%, Hillary: 33% (Bernie had about same Independent votes as Trump)
Virginia - Bernie: 58%, Hillary: 42% (Bernie had more Independent votes than Trump)
North Carolina - Bernie: 58%, Hillary: 34% (Bernie got ~45% more Independent votes than Trump)
Nevada - Bernie: 71%, Hillary: 23% (Bernie got at least 50% more Independent votes than Trump)
Iowa - Bernie: 69%, Hillary: 26% (no vote totals released for Democrats)
New Hampshire - Bernie: 73%, Hillary: 25% (Bernie got ~67% more Independent votes than Trump)
Pennsylvania - Bernie: 72%, Hillary: 26% (Trump got ~132% more Independent votes than Hillary)
Wisconsin - Bernie: 72%, Hillary: 28% (Bernie got ~59% more Independent votes than Trump)
In state after state, even in states that Hillary won huge, she can't seem to win over the Independent identifying voters while Bernie can. You're right there's a pattern here and it's an ugly one for Hillary come November.
-CNN Exit Polls
Percentage comparisons are achieved by multiplying the vote totals for each primary times the exit poll 'Independent percentage' times the 'percent of Independent votes' for each candidate (which makes them approximations).