Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: A short primer on why America distrusts Hillary [View all]pinebox
(5,761 posts)42. There's only one answer

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trump ties with Pope Francis in U.S. poll for second most-admired man in the world
2cannan
May 2016
#44
Please try to stick to the subject of the OP and address each point present there. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2016
#34
Congratulations Hillary did edge out Sarah Palin this year by one percentage point.
gordianot
May 2016
#38
you supply a graph edited to leave out the last couple of months? because Clintons numbers are
bettyellen
May 2016
#72
If Hillary Clinton can't stand up to the facts, what chance does she really have?
Octafish
May 2016
#9
Low information voters distrust Hillary. They're the same people who love Trump.
baldguy
May 2016
#7
It can be true or not true. The only requirement for propaganda to work is that it be negetive.
baldguy
May 2016
#56
Tell us, how much of the stuff in the OP do low info voters need to know in order to vote for her? n
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2016
#37
Low information voters usually trusts people they shouldn't, like in this case Hillary. Where the
insta8er
May 2016
#83
Pointing out Hillary's "mistakes" and lack of judgement they consider to be "negative attacks"
pdsimdars
May 2016
#11
The title itself is sophistry seeing the GOP spent millions of tax payer money on lowering her
uponit7771
May 2016
#46
Yes, even the context is full of the type of sophistry the title has in it. For instance Sanders has
uponit7771
May 2016
#50
"Bawwww right wing smearing, right wing smearing why are you doing the repukes jobs for them"
VulgarPoet
May 2016
#33
Got a new one each week. She was about putting coal miners out of work, now it was a missstatement!
EndElectoral
May 2016
#51
if she had no real job yet at age 40.....and an out of wedlock baby, she would be considered unfit.
bettyellen
May 2016
#81
She lies, she conceals, she flip flops, she's thoroughly corrupt, but, hey --
Arugula Latte
May 2016
#61