Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The close results of this primary season are prima facie evidence that Hillary is a weak candidate [View all]TM99
(8,352 posts)86. Oh cut the bullshit.
If Clinton wins, it is a 'fair and blessed' thing. If he wins, it is 'undemocratic, elitist, and stupid'. Just listen to yourself and walk away with your head in shame where it belongs!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The close results of this primary season are prima facie evidence that Hillary is a weak candidate [View all]
Android3.14
May 2016
OP
Candiate Obama did not have he albatross of an actual ongoing FBI investigation around his
silvershadow
May 2016
#4
Not at all. It means she is the most embarrassing candidate yet to run this far like this.
silvershadow
May 2016
#8
Doesn't that suggest he should have beaten Clinton more easily, if she's a weak candidate?
Garrett78
May 2016
#12
I am, but that doesn't mean I won't respond to things that need responded to. I am
silvershadow
May 2016
#23
You're also not the person that said "I don't want to vote for a woman unless I have to"
Renew Deal
May 2016
#62
From what TNT was reporting last night, they're considering drafting Biden or Warren...
JudyM
May 2016
#60
... Not as VPs, as alternates ready to go when the FBI referral finally comes through.
JudyM
May 2016
#65
They don't want him, that's why they are planning for others. He challenges their mainframe of
JudyM
May 2016
#74
I was watching it live last night. I think to watch past shows we need to pay membership.
JudyM
May 2016
#79
It actually means we have 2 strong candidates that appeal to different demographic segments
Dem2
May 2016
#17
Really? I know many non-idiots who think that this election is a reflection of the lack of
anotherproletariat
May 2016
#24
It's not fair to call them idiots. They just are authoritarian followers that so badly want a
rhett o rick
May 2016
#28
You must be watching a Primary in another country. The U. S. Primary is not close.
Lil Missy
May 2016
#31
Why do I picture you standing in a corner with fingers in ears, eyes shut tightly
rhett o rick
May 2016
#33
They need to start worrying. Capitalism is not sustainable and sooner or later the peons
rhett o rick
May 2016
#39
The Clinton followers want the Sanders supporters to bow down and acquiesces to the "chosen one."
rhett o rick
May 2016
#35
Lacking rational or objective thought, I'd most likely make the same allegation too.
LanternWaste
May 2016
#51
A loser calling the winner weak only makes the loser even more pathetic for losing. Nice try, Bern.
CrowCityDem
May 2016
#55
By that logic, Bernie is losing to a weak candidate, which makes him even worse. Great analysis!
IamMab
May 2016
#81
Only an idiot would claim that the losing candidate is actually the stronger candidate.
JoePhilly
May 2016
#91
Is that a dog whistle to call out all the idiots so we can put them on ignore?
pdsimdars
May 2016
#92
They aren't close. '08 was close. 2016 isn't close. Not at all, not even. Not kinda or sorta.
seabeyond
May 2016
#95
no it's evidence of the effectiveness of McCarthyism & the large number of people who r easily lead
Bill USA
May 2016
#97
When is Sanders planning on becoming a full fledged candidate and address all responsiblilities
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#101