2016 Postmortem

pat_k

(13,398 posts)

43. Really?

Reply to Demsrule86 (Reply #38)

Wed May 4, 2016, 05:06 PM

May 2016

Seems to me he's joining in on attacking Trump.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Bernie Sanders pulls off shock victory..." (The Guardian) [View all] pat_k May 2016 OP

They are wrong Skink May 2016 #1

They seem to be wrong about almost EVERYTHING! pdsimdars May 2016 #29

Some were shocked. dchill May 2016 #2

I wasn't too surprised either. pat_k May 2016 #8

MSM was much more surprised than I was. dchill May 2016 #10

He keeps screwing up their "narrative." pat_k May 2016 #11

Rachel, Tweety, Chucky and others seemed genuinely flabergasted. I took great enjoyment nc4bo May 2016 #20

Actually... i don't think Nate has to eat crow.... Adrahil May 2016 #21

Then why did "Nate" say Hillary had a 92% chance of winning. He makes no sense. reformist2 May 2016 #23

"Nate" didn't say that. The model did. It's a model based on polls. Adrahil May 2016 #25

Because that's what the polls said and he said he doubted the polls. randome May 2016 #26

That allows him to claim accuracy had she won while protecting him from claims of inaccuracy Bluenorthwest May 2016 #30

Cast from the same mold Hillary and Bill were. closeupready May 2016 #42

He's useless. The truth is, most of us could have predicted at least 80% of the races. reformist2 May 2016 #63

His info is about instilling doubt in Sanders supporters, not in really predicting anything. NorthCarolina May 2016 #51

Go Bernie! pmorlan1 May 2016 #3

That's not that "narrow" a victory. highprincipleswork May 2016 #4

He's going to gain 5 or 7 delegates. In an 83-delegate contest. Garrett78 May 2016 #16

Well considering he needs to be winning by an average of 30+ points.... Adrahil May 2016 #22

53%: A "landslide" for Trump; 53%: A "slim margin" for Bernie lagomorph777 May 2016 #44

It's winner-take-all delegates for Trump; it's split the delegates for Bernie. pnwmom May 2016 #62

Sure, relax. Eeeverything is juust fiiinne. lagomorph777 May 2016 #64

Oh dear, what will they think of Oregon? Barack_America May 2016 #5

What will they think of West Virginia? Fawke Em May 2016 #53

Go, Bernie!!! snot May 2016 #6

K & R GreatGazoo May 2016 #7

LOL! KittyWampus May 2016 #9

The first of a new series of wins. Betty Karlson May 2016 #12

Define "more" Garrett78 May 2016 #14

With California coming up? He may well do so. Betty Karlson May 2016 #15

CA and NJ make up more than half of the remaining delegates. Garrett78 May 2016 #17

Quite the contrary: Latinos have long ago stopped being Clinton's firewall. Betty Karlson May 2016 #19

My point is that he would need massive victories in those states. Garrett78 May 2016 #39

NJ is effectively Open. pat_k May 2016 #45

Debbie had best start shenaniganing, then. Betty Karlson May 2016 #46

You are flat out accusing her of theft. false accusation simply to smear. dishonest in the least. seabeyond May 2016 #48

Debbie? I wouldn't put it past her. Betty Karlson May 2016 #49

What you wouldn't put it past her with really does not matter a whole hell of a lot. seabeyond May 2016 #50

Your reply doesn't make sense. Verbs are missing, as well as coherency. Betty Karlson May 2016 #52

I don't care if you are accusing Clinton or DWS of voter theft. It is a nasty, unfounded accusation. seabeyond May 2016 #54

DWS's bias is well established by now. But nice of you to agree that Clinton and DWS are not one and Betty Karlson May 2016 #55

NO proof or reason to accuse anyone of STEALING votes. Not much of an ethical line. seabeyond May 2016 #56

Proof: no. Reason: impossible number of "accidents" all in Clinton's favor Betty Karlson May 2016 #57

Whatever. seabeyond May 2016 #58

Nice of you to concede the point. Betty Karlson May 2016 #59

You have no qualms at all accusing something so atrocious with no fact. Says it all. seabeyond May 2016 #60

I stated my reason, and you didn't have any counterargument. Betty Karlson May 2016 #61

You think he is going to win by 30+ pounts in California!? Adrahil May 2016 #24

No. After Sanders won in Michigan and Indiana in spite of Nate Silver's fervent assertions, the only Betty Karlson May 2016 #35

That's a complete non-answer. Adrahil May 2016 #36

Are we even at the same wavelength? Betty Karlson May 2016 #37

K&R suffragette May 2016 #13

Aww, the pre-written stories are out the window now. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #18

I did not find it shocking Demsrule86 May 2016 #27

Lol! NeoConsSuck May 2016 #28

... to California with an aching in his heart. Ed Suspicious May 2016 #34

He just the chance for delegates Demsrule86 May 2016 #38

We shall see. Ed Suspicious May 2016 #41

Really? pat_k May 2016 #43

White open primary? Shocking? seabeyond May 2016 #31

No shock here. nt LWolf May 2016 #32

Not surprising unless you buy the bull MSM is selling. Ed Suspicious May 2016 #33

Not possible. I was assured right here on DU LondonReign2 May 2016 #40

His 19th victory: 18 states and Democrats Abroad. NT Eric J in MN May 2016 #47