Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(67,782 posts)

5. What does that have to do with the OP and subject at hand? Why not address THIS issue? BTW...

Wed May 4, 2016, 08:29 PM

May 2016

...what you posted wasn't from me, it was someone else, so why drag that off-topic stuff into this discussion?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You guys couldn't be more clueless. cali May 2016 #1

Much more low-brow discussion here ----> JonLeibowitz May 2016 #2

That place is like Jonestown. QC May 2016 #3

Actually I do think it is wrong for Jane Sanders to receive that money. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #10

Thanks, I appreciate that. George II May 2016 #11

I don't see a problem with the FEC filings though. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #13

Be nice. Bernie and Jane have to make a living too. WhiteTara May 2016 #4

Sorry to disprove your priors. Oops. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #14

And Jane Sanders is still making money from her commission position Lucinda May 2016 #8

Did he commit a Federal felony or 10? No, he did not. DisgustipatedinCA May 2016 #12

Are you also mad at Bill Clinton for signing the bill into law? Eric J in MN May 2016 #16

Which toxic waste? Based on what action of Bernie Sanders? NT Eric J in MN May 2016 #20