Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: About Guccifer's new hacking claim [View all]ucrdem
(15,512 posts)67. All of it, and yes the FBI is partisan:
OpenSecrets.Org: "Comey's Conservative Chops"
by David Steinbach on May 31, 2013
But Comey is even more thoroughly a Republican than many observers even those steeped in the partisan ways of the nations capital may realize.
{snip}
In fact, the apparent nominee-to-be has contributed to Obamas opponents in each of the past two elections. In August 2008, Comey sent $2,300 to the GOP presidential nominee, Sen. John McCain (Ariz.). A few years later, Comey did his part to try to prevent Obamas re-election, maxing out to Republican Mitt Romney with $5,000 in donations. Comey also gave $2,500 during that cycle to Susan Brooks (Ind.), a Republican with whom Comey had worked at DOJ. Brooks went on to win a House seat.
{snip}
In fact, the apparent nominee-to-be has contributed to Obamas opponents in each of the past two elections. In August 2008, Comey sent $2,300 to the GOP presidential nominee, Sen. John McCain (Ariz.). A few years later, Comey did his part to try to prevent Obamas re-election, maxing out to Republican Mitt Romney with $5,000 in donations. Comey also gave $2,500 during that cycle to Susan Brooks (Ind.), a Republican with whom Comey had worked at DOJ. Brooks went on to win a House seat.
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2013/05/fbi-director-nominee-comeys-conserv/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
You need at least a 3-tier server construct with multiple firewalls to semi-secure the backend.
TheBlackAdder
May 2016
#65
For what it is worth, before Guccifer came over, he said in an interview he shared the emails
Samantha
May 2016
#6
This is not the article but is something else I read earlier I found very interesting
Samantha
May 2016
#40
Postscript: "Breaking: Hillary Clinton Put Spies' Lives At Risk" from Observer/News and Politics"
Samantha
May 2016
#45
key words. the content. it is out there. check Sunday for his interview on nbc. she really screwed
roguevalley
May 2016
#70
You did good, kid. I already posted an entry and I am fired up and ready to go
Samantha
May 2016
#107
Failure to turn over classified info when she left State violated her security agreement and
leveymg
May 2016
#11
Not just classified info - she was supposed to turn over all her emails, as I recall.
JudyM
May 2016
#12
Much of the most highly classified material was abstracted from classified documents originating
leveymg
May 2016
#46
Of course, here's an excerpt of the CBS News report. It was also reported in NYT
leveymg
May 2016
#50
how could anyone endorse this individual for the presidency? she also took it upon herself
amborin
May 2016
#37
Do you know if the Clinton Foundation used the same server? I remember
Land of Enchantment
May 2016
#10
That's information about the housing of the server at the Foundation I never saw before, Paul.
leveymg
May 2016
#47
But we KNOW that hundreds of thousands of State Department .gov emails were hacked.
pnwmom
May 2016
#38
LOL. They're good at stings but the Clintons are way too smart for their tricks. nt
ucrdem
May 2016
#76
The investigation is a partisan sham. This story is ridiculous but the VRWC is shameless. nt
ucrdem
May 2016
#60
I can go into my google settings right now and see the IP of EVERY computer
Dr Hobbitstein
May 2016
#77
I was addressing the poster's claim of someone logging into her account via
Dr Hobbitstein
May 2016
#91
But you weren't talking about the FBI, and my response was not about the FBI.
Dr Hobbitstein
May 2016
#98
For a period of time in 2013, there doesn't appear to be any security logs.
HooptieWagon
May 2016
#112
Aren't the Clinton's, like most of America's high-rollers, considered above the law though? nt
NorthCarolina
May 2016
#86