Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Tarc

(10,597 posts)

14. Once again, you have no real idea of what you're talking about

Reply to TimPlo (Reply #11)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:23 PM

May 2016

You may peruse the findings at your leisure; http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/complete_report/appendix_4.pdf

but the gist is that the Dan Rather's documents were produced on a modern computer, not a typewriter of the 1970s. Once in a great while, liberals fuck up and right-wingers are correct. This was one of those times.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Did NBC News Sit on Explosive Story About Clinton’s Alleged Hacked Email Server For Weeks? [View all] NWCorona May 2016 OP

so, Fox, sensing the "news" in this, did an interview with him from jail and had it on last night. pdsimdars May 2016 #1

Probably because they realize it's nothing more than another Dan Rather + Killian docs Tarc May 2016 #2

Yeah joshcryer May 2016 #5

Then why run with it now? NWCorona May 2016 #6

Because he is TimPlo May 2016 #12

Maybe someone bribed or coerced him in some way. Now who would benefit? Hmmm. KittyWampus May 2016 #28

Ha If you think email thing is not true then using That thing is not good idea. TimPlo May 2016 #11

Once again, you have no real idea of what you're talking about Tarc May 2016 #14

now you have truly revealed yourself. grasswire May 2016 #22

How so? Because I can admit when we screw things up? Tarc May 2016 #23

the documents were bad because the secretary subsequently disavowed them. KittyWampus May 2016 #30

That has nothing to do with it Tarc May 2016 #37

I am not goofing up. Dan Rather interviewed the secretary and she said she typed KittyWampus May 2016 #29

yes, we all know that. nt grasswire May 2016 #33

Because Comcast, their owner, fundraises for Hillary. So of course they would sit on this. jillan May 2016 #3

Yup! NWCorona May 2016 #9

Probably because it's not explosive Onlooker May 2016 #4

You better hope that he has no evidence... Human101948 May 2016 #8

If he can describe the content of a single email, she's finished. lagomorph777 May 2016 #32

How many primaries would have gone differently if this story had been reported promptly? tularetom May 2016 #7

That's my feeling as well. nt NWCorona May 2016 #10

How many primaries would've gone differently if the truth of Sanders' tenure as Chairman KittyWampus May 2016 #31

The WHY is self-evident. 99Forever May 2016 #13

The executive/managing editors determine what's newsworthy. oasis May 2016 #15

At that time Clinton had just lost Alaska, Hawaii and WA by big margins GreatGazoo May 2016 #16

The most important thing to MSM is passage of the TPP which Hillary Clinton will facilitate Samantha May 2016 #17

Because NBC serves its masters. Trump, Clinton, all the same to them, the MSM and PTB. CentralCoaster May 2016 #18

Three words: New York primary. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #19

Agreed! NWCorona May 2016 #21

B/C owner of MSNBC, Comcast, is huge HRC donor amborin May 2016 #20

^^^So much this! GreenPartyVoter May 2016 #35

Probably don't want to Dan Rather themselves. n/t JTFrog May 2016 #24

Point taken but in memogate they failed to authenticate the document NWCorona May 2016 #25

Why did the hacker pick a Clinton supporting nbc to talk to? Fool. nt/ trudyco May 2016 #26

Was there anyone else trying that had the appropriate pull? NWCorona May 2016 #27

This article might shed some light FlatBaroque May 2016 #34

Thanks that was good! NWCorona May 2016 #36