Game Changer? "FBI Confirms They Will Question Hillary Clinton"

[The Second Stone]

24. Yes and no

There are ways that Clinton's legal counsel can require the FBI to disclose whether she is a target/suspect/person of interest/witness. From everything I've seen, she is a witness, and not an FBI target, the only people who would be targets would have wilful intent to evade the law's security purpose. That said, I would expect the FBI to have better questioning than former prosecutor Trey Gowdy, Congressman Extradinbullshit, who did not look like a law school grad in his questioning, much less a prosecutor, he looked like an unhinged idiot pretending to know what he was doing, which appeared to be trying to "get her" in the most inept way possible.

So yes, it is meaningful in that it will bring a conclusion sooner, no in that it will not likely result in an indictment unless she is willing to say her testimony before Congress was untrue and that she had wilful intent to evade the law.